From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] edk2setup.sh shortcomings To: Rebecca Cran ,devel@edk2.groups.io From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydmluIEjDpHVzZXI=?= X-Originating-Location: Berlin, Land Berlin, DE (104.28.129.25) X-Originating-Platform: iPhone Safari 16.3 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:02:49 -0800 References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <17027.1675418569211847080@groups.io> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1V3GmtbZ6f08dsnTo26b" --1V3GmtbZ6f08dsnTo26b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Getting a patch reviewed by one maintainer and having the rest not respond = even after multiple(!) pings is not =E2=80=9Emissed=E2=80=9C. Let=E2=80=98s= be realistic here. When I was still actively subscribed to the list, I had all mails that CC= =E2=80=98d me go to a separate folder. If I had more patch traffic, I would= have had two (patch and non-patch mails) or more folders. At least in theo= ry, everyone can organise their inbox as they please. The edk2 build system stack is pretty inconvenient at times. Voluntary cont= ributions such as this should be proactively endorsed. Best regards, Marvin --1V3GmtbZ6f08dsnTo26b Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Getting a patch reviewed by one maintainer and having the rest not respond = even after multiple(!) pings is not „missed“. Let‘s be re= alistic here.

When I was still actively subscribed to the list, = I had all mails that CC‘d me go to a separate folder. If I had more p= atch traffic, I would have had two (patch and non-patch mails) or more fold= ers. At least in theory, everyone can organise their inbox as they please.<= br />
The edk2 build system stack is pretty inconvenient at times. Vol= untary contributions such as this should be proactively endorsed.

 Best regards,
 Marvin --1V3GmtbZ6f08dsnTo26b--