From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=96.73.9.1; helo=muon.bluestop.org; envelope-from=rebecca@bluestop.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [96.73.9.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EF42118C51C for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from muon.bluestop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA528D21DC; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:04:18 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bluestop.org; s=mail; t=1542492258; bh=8Tdg75fUZmf3rwQAy7uQJYjbpw6ky30c77KPrErBDRQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cTjFalsJ9pMYdAtFpZ9ryj7VJwl4atn7OXd85BQQXBrwZX5r9qZKuVho/k9Imjse6 +0GLqlSGbHXD4ifrr61O+G+wM+/h/nFxs9dtM9Z/hQAqz1jM5wrtkwj2LLwuW7t8oE +irfXwc8x+impusRheiFgaR9F96wiHYqxhHILHus= Received: from muon.bluestop.org ([127.0.0.1]) by muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2yeR_T0c6kk; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:04:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from photon.int.bluestop.org (gw.bluestop.org [96.73.9.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:04:18 -0700 (MST) From: Rebecca Cran To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, Sean Brogan Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" , stephano , "Zimmer, Vincent" Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:03:33 -0700 Message-ID: <1916170.9KSsKqBpt2@photon.int.bluestop.org> In-Reply-To: References: <6535b4dd-57ac-856c-e013-ae8b3203c550@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:03:36 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" On Friday, 16 November 2018 19:42:51 MST Sean Brogan via edk2-devel wrote: > Mike, > > I like the github teams option for discussion as it is just there, free, and > easy. It integrates nicely with all other parts of github. Notifications > are supported for those that want email. Is there any reason this path > doesn't get used now as a test since tianocore is already in github? I do wonder why there aren't more _big_ open source projects using Github if it _is_ there, free and easy to use. I'm aware lots and lots use it for hosting their repositories, but I'm not aware of many that use it for code reviews, discussions etc. I found that CoreBoot uses Gerrit: https://review.coreboot.org/q/status:open GNOME evaluated Phabricator and GitLab (but not GitHub, because "GitHub is not Free Software, of couse, which makes it unacceptable to many in the GNOME community") - https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure . They decided to go with GitLab: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2017-May/msg00051.html One comment from a user on the GNOME evaluation (https://wiki.gnome.org/ Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure/Comments) said: "We tried migrating libnice to phabricator.freedesktop.org and it was a bit of a disaster as the "drive-by" contribution process is horrible with Phabricator, requiring to either download a tool or copy-paste patches into a webpage. Upstream Phabricator is also very hostile to the github style of reviews (where you can review small patches, not everything squashed into one SVN style). Even Bugzilla with Splinter is nicer for new contributors.. So let's go with GitLab. That said, all of Collabora's Phabricator tools are already public. ? OlivieCrete" -- Rebecca