From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 209.132.183.28, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by groups.io with SMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 06:10:16 -0700 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051EF3002F52; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.36.118.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132CE600F8; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 00/35] Specific platform to run OVMF in Xen PVH and HVM guests To: devel@edk2.groups.io, anthony.perard@citrix.com Cc: Julien Grall , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jordan Justen , Ard Biesheuvel , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Andrew Cooper References: <20190729153944.24239-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: <1ba55a93-e880-6fe3-abfc-a840d956bf3c@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:10:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190729153944.24239-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Anthony, On 07/29/19 17:39, Anthony PERARD wrote: > Patch series available in this git branch: > https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/aperard/ovmf.git br.platform-xen-pvh-v4 > > Changes in v4: > - patch "OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Reserve hvmloader's memory only when it has > run" was removed, and instead a different change is done in > "OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Rework memory detection" > - other changes detailed in the notes of each patch I've gone through the v4 series. If reviewers on the xen-devel list think v4 is okay to merge, I can do that (with the small fixups I offered here and there). I suggest that we wait a few days -- please ping me when you believe the review on xen-devel has concluded. If you prefer to post v5, that works as well of course. Thanks, Laszlo