From: "Kun Qin" <kuqin12@gmail.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com
Cc: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi1" <qi1.zhang@intel.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul1" <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH Kun,v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:19:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c9bbdf5-8203-99b5-7c67-50115ff9cf90@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4929EFC054A0F98A7B5037CFD2889@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Thanks, Mike. I will drop the applicable code change and send a v2
series shortly.
Regards,
Kun
On 7/13/2022 5:47 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> Hi Kun,
>
> I would prefer to focus on the spec issue with this patch set and only
> update DEC and .H file.
>
> The idea of removing all the status code related PCDs and updating all the
> source files to use the #defines is a different change. And that change may
> impact many downstream modules/libs that currently use the PCDs.
>
> Mike
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:39 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi1 <qi1.zhang@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul1
>> <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>; Gao, Liming
>> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> The intention was to encourage the usage of new definition in .H file
>> once the definition
>> is updated. The PCD is left as is only to serve as backwards
>> compatibility purpose.
>>
>> Do you think only updating the DEC and .H file is more ideal? I could
>> drop the other changes
>> if so desired.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kun
>>
>> On 7/13/2022 5:30 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
>>> Hi Kun,
>>>
>>> Why was the PCD usage not preserved and only the value updated in the DEC file and .H file?
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:21 PM
>>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>>>> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi1 <qi1.zhang@intel.com>; Kumar,
>> Rahul1
>>>> <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>>>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition
>>>>
>>>> Hi SecurityPkg maintainers & EDK2 stewards,
>>>>
>>>> I sent out this patch series intending to update/fix the PI spec through
>>>> code first process.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please shed some light on it and let me know if any feedback?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Kun
>>>>
>>>> On 7/5/2022 8:38 PM, Kun Qin via groups.io wrote:
>>>>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3966
>>>>>
>>>>> From PI Specification v1.7 Errata A, EFI_PERIPHERAL_DOCKING is defined as
>>>>> 0xD0000 (as well as included in PiStatusCode.h).
>>>>>
>>>>> However, subclass employed as PCD for TPM peripheral in SecurityPkg is
>>>>> also defined as 0xD0000. The TPM subclass code was used in TcgPei.c when
>>>>> reporting error codes.
>>>>>
>>>>> The collision of subclass definition could cause the parsing of reported
>>>>> errors being ambiguous.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch series add EFI_PERIPHERAL_TPM as a spec-defined value and
>>>>> removed potential usages in the SecurityPkg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch v1 branch: https://github.com/kuqin12/edk2/tree/BZ3966-add_tpm_subclass
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
>>>>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
>>>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
>>>>> Cc: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kun Qin (7):
>>>>> EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: New peripheral subclass for TPM
>>>>> MdePkg: MmCommunication: Add TPM subclass definition to MdePkg
>>>>> SecurityPkg: Tcg2Dxe: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>> SecurityPkg: Tcg2Pei: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>> SecurityPkg: TcgDxe: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>> SecurityPkg: TcgPei: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>> SecurityPkg: SubClassTpm: Updated default value
>>>>>
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.c | 4 +-
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.c | 4 +-
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgDxe/TcgDxe.c | 2 +-
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgPei/TcgPei.c | 4 +-
>>>>> CodeFirst/BZ3966-SpecChange.md | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiStatusCode.h | 1 +
>>>>> SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec | 6 +-
>>>>> SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.uni | 2 +-
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.inf | 1 -
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.inf | 1 -
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgDxe/TcgDxe.inf | 1 -
>>>>> SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgPei/TcgPei.inf | 1 -
>>>>> 12 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 CodeFirst/BZ3966-SpecChange.md
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-14 0:47 [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH Kun,v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition Michael D Kinney
2022-07-14 1:19 ` Kun Qin [this message]
[not found] ` <17018D5A99B7EABB.31468@groups.io>
2022-07-15 0:39 ` Kun Qin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c9bbdf5-8203-99b5-7c67-50115ff9cf90@gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox