From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Qin Long <qin.long@intel.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: ting.ye@intel.com, hao.a.wu@intel.com, feng.tian@intel.com,
eric.dong@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/4] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Suppress extra build warnings in openssl source
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da75385-b1b8-c10f-e0a1-2925bf3a92f1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170331170517.4672-2-qin.long@intel.com>
On 03/31/17 19:05, Qin Long wrote:
> This patch added some extra build options to suppress possible warnings
> when building openssl source under GCC48 and VS2010. Including:
>
> Adding "-Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized" to suppress the following GCC48
> build warning:
> OpensslLib/openssl/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:2543:9: error: "len" may
> be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> len += pskhdrlen;
> ^
This happens in the tls_construct_client_key_exchange() function. After
reviewing the function, the warning is indeed incorrect. I agree with
the fix (adding -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized), but I propose the
following too:
- file an upstream OpenSSL bug report about this (the existent "len = 0"
assignment can be moved to the unconditional part of the code),
- file a TianoCore BZ as well, so that we don't forget removing
-Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized once the OpenSSL bug is fixed and we
adopt the next stable release with the OpenSSL change.
The point is, I think -Werror=maybe-uninitialized is a valuable warning,
and it might help us catch an actual bug in OpenSSL later on. So I don't
think it should be turned off permanently.
> And adding "/wd4306" to suppress the following VS2010 build warning:
> openssl\crypto\asn1\tasn_dec.c(795) : warning C4306: 'type cast' :
> conversion from 'int' to 'ASN1_VALUE *' of greater size
That again seems like a valid warning, the C standard doesn't guarantee
that (int) can be converted to a pointer type and vice versa. The code
should be using intptr_t or uintptr_t (in edk2 we use UINTN for that).
This is the code in question:
case V_ASN1_NULL:
if (len) {
ASN1err(ASN1_F_ASN1_EX_C2I, ASN1_R_NULL_IS_WRONG_LENGTH);
goto err;
}
*pval = (ASN1_VALUE *)1;
break;
This is really awful. But, if it is necessary, it should be
*pval = (ASN1_VALUE *)(uintptr_t)1;
Again, I think it's OK to suppress the warnings for now, but I think we
should have a longer term reminder to reenable them.
>
> Cc: Ting Ye <ting.ye@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Qin Long <qin.long@intel.com>
> ---
> CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib.inf | 15 ++++++++++-----
> CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLibCrypto.inf | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib.inf b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib.inf
> index 42f72f4f1f..cbabb34bdd 100644
> --- a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib.inf
> +++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib.inf
> @@ -535,21 +535,26 @@
> # C4244: conversion from type1 to type2, possible loss of data
> # C4245: conversion from type1 to type2, signed/unsigned mismatch
> # C4267: conversion from size_t to type, possible loss of data
> + # C4306: 'identifier' : conversion from 'type1' to 'type2' of greater size
> # C4389: 'operator' : signed/unsigned mismatch (xxxx)
> # C4702: unreachable code
> # C4706: assignment within conditional expression
> #
> MSFT:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> - MSFT:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> - MSFT:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> + MSFT:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4306 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> + MSFT:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4306 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
>
> INTEL:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER -U__ICC $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /w
> INTEL:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER -U__ICC $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /w
> INTEL:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER -U__ICC $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /w
>
> - GCC:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
> - GCC:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -DNO_MSABI_VA_FUNCS
> - GCC:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
> + #
> + # Suppress the following build warnings in openssl so we don't break the build with -Werror
> + # -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: there exist some other paths for which the variable is not initialized.
If that was true, that would be an actual bug in the OpenSSL code base,
and suppressing the warning in such a case would also be a bug. We may
only suppress the warning because it is *invalid* -- there is no such
problematic code path, only the compiler (incorrectly) thinks there is.
So please update the comment. I would even go as far as including the
TianoCore BZ number in this comment, for the BZ which tracks the
longer-term re-enablement of this warning.
Looks good to me otherwise.
(Note: personally I can't reproduce the build issues that I reported, at
least with GCC48 that I use.)
Thanks!
Laszlo
> + #
> + GCC:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized
> + GCC:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -DNO_MSABI_VA_FUNCS
> + GCC:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized
> GCC:*_*_ARM_CC_FLAGS = $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
> GCC:*_*_AARCH64_CC_FLAGS = $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
>
> diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLibCrypto.inf b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLibCrypto.inf
> index cbbb456d70..026b551bca 100644
> --- a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLibCrypto.inf
> +++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLibCrypto.inf
> @@ -496,21 +496,26 @@
> # C4244: conversion from type1 to type2, possible loss of data
> # C4245: conversion from type1 to type2, signed/unsigned mismatch
> # C4267: conversion from size_t to type, possible loss of data
> + # C4306: 'identifier' : conversion from 'type1' to 'type2' of greater size
> # C4389: 'operator' : signed/unsigned mismatch (xxxx)
> # C4702: unreachable code
> # C4706: assignment within conditional expression
> #
> MSFT:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> - MSFT:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> - MSFT:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> + MSFT:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4306 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
> + MSFT:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /wd4090 /wd4244 /wd4245 /wd4267 /wd4306 /wd4389 /wd4702 /wd4706
>
> INTEL:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER -U__ICC $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /w
> INTEL:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER -U__ICC $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /w
> INTEL:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 -U_MSC_VER -U__ICC $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) /w
>
> - GCC:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
> - GCC:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -DNO_MSABI_VA_FUNCS
> - GCC:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
> + #
> + # Suppress the following build warnings in openssl so we don't break the build with -Werror
> + # -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: there exist some other paths for which the variable is not initialized.
> + #
> + GCC:*_*_IA32_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized
> + GCC:*_*_X64_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -DNO_MSABI_VA_FUNCS
> + GCC:*_*_IPF_CC_FLAGS = -U_WIN32 -U_WIN64 $(OPENSSL_FLAGS) -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized
> GCC:*_*_ARM_CC_FLAGS = $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
> GCC:*_*_AARCH64_CC_FLAGS = $(OPENSSL_FLAGS)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-31 17:05 [Patch 0/4] *** Resolving CryptoPkg build issues *** Qin Long
2017-03-31 17:05 ` [Patch 1/4] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Suppress extra build warnings in openssl source Qin Long
2017-03-31 18:23 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-04-01 1:10 ` Long, Qin
2017-03-31 17:05 ` [Patch 2/4] CryptoPkg: Fix possible unresolved external symbol issue Qin Long
2017-03-31 18:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-04-01 2:31 ` Long, Qin
2017-03-31 17:05 ` [Patch 3/4] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Adding NULL checking in timer() wrapper Qin Long
2017-03-31 18:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-04-01 2:14 ` Long, Qin
2017-03-31 17:05 ` [Patch 4/4] CryptoPkg: One workaround to resolve potential build issue Qin Long
2017-03-31 18:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-04-01 2:27 ` Long, Qin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1da75385-b1b8-c10f-e0a1-2925bf3a92f1@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox