From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA521A1E06 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id v143so46139421wmv.0 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:18:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gGQLSkdzqr52hogF08L2rcQWYHuy7KtHvNsD1D6GhYA=; b=NCdEqUiPJ/OL8gD8tXNvr2pJBjE/439TrMO3k3MIfJopJQzN+P/hWYmZ0sjziyKSWZ UuaTxxWS3uxqM51Zf/yFrEfZ+MfVGs/zh2XV5DCDuvurhPdjoIC1mK87MQ53o6dfkEXi +AtUZcWsDTv8j9dISdiiKY9O7quO4wX1qPiFs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gGQLSkdzqr52hogF08L2rcQWYHuy7KtHvNsD1D6GhYA=; b=HuJhAubB7IRQ0PHwkP4z1FA5nM4MVJ3lGtu/TCbqSVMZWErWxY1ZgkZNTYcEU6ElHC fBgqXH3KMIJ8vIUKhC8HY3IQiI3HS2ArMp5VASuL6JJYgawms3QKNY3FM3pWHMK3JfCH bfmzvy7AUn6PaaA5HDlqr295g7OL6dZPYlgqCEakFnswt7KoHwv4g66XUy7aBOfe5RcH qMGl4UJcWaqmxngZBz4RSHKEyIz6BP02nVk4v6EQEDjRNgUQG/YBsIbzpAMs7Kcmr5BZ jABw2Yk1J8F75Rf9dhou7/9LeQdtzEW3QWAZ7zlrXmPrgkqkmR0bugSFiS/D5mDnFVFZ uEsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN34HuPSmbsQOLmxnYu8GXC+sKgW4kSZ1s/Irk8082fjaoybfCqwfD+7VqszaqKFtA7 X-Received: by 10.28.22.6 with SMTP id 6mr4807779wmw.55.1472843909248; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bivouac.eciton.net (bivouac.eciton.net. [2a00:1098:0:86:1000:23:0:2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jq5sm11852922wjc.20.2016.09.02.12.18.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 20:18:26 +0100 From: Leif Lindholm To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: edk2-devel-01 , Laszlo Ersek , Michael D Kinney , Liming Gao , afish@apple.com Message-ID: <20160902191826.GH4715@bivouac.eciton.net> References: <20160902142912.17297-1-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <20160902142912.17297-2-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <6C8DC7F6-2459-4CD6-A556-3B17A1FBBF5F@linaro.org> <20160902152351.GB4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <20160902180513.GE4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <20160902183215.GG4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <8A4AB213-88D8-4408-9299-3B2AE4B339F9@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8A4AB213-88D8-4408-9299-3B2AE4B339F9@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:18:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:45:26PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> > >> I agree that fixing the branch now would be nice. I just don't > >> understand why fixing BaseMemoryLibStm in place is not a better > >> solution, especially if we are nuking it anyway next week. That way, > >> we have to change all the platforms only a single time. > > > > Mainly because we don't _know_ that it will be resolved next week and > > I'm currently having some trust issues regarding these libraries. > > > > If that's what it takes to get consensus, sure, I'll go along with > > that. I'm fully aware I'm being slightly irrational here. > > > > So where to now? Just push 2-3 from Wednesday? > > Yes, please. On Monday, I will look into adding Arm support to the > optdxe flavor, and once that is in, we can move all platforms over > and deprecate/remove the stm version. Allright - now pushed. Mike, Andrew, apologies for the noise, and thank you for very quick feedback. / Leif