From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Cc: ryan.harkin@linaro.org, edk2-devel@lists.01.org,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] MmcDxe: expand to support multiple blocks
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:15:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161114171525.GA27644@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479019678-12621-9-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:47:57PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> Make use of DMA to transfer multiple blocks at one time. It could
> improve the performance on MMC/SD driver.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>
> ---
> EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h | 6 +
> EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcBlockIo.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h b/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h
> index 5028045..cd5335a 100644
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ typedef UINT32 MMC_CMD;
> #define MMC_CMD20 (MMC_INDX(20) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE)
> #define MMC_CMD23 (MMC_INDX(23) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE)
> #define MMC_CMD24 (MMC_INDX(24) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE)
> +#define MMC_CMD25 (MMC_INDX(25) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE)
> #define MMC_CMD55 (MMC_INDX(55) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE)
> #define MMC_ACMD41 (MMC_INDX(41) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE | MMC_CMD_NO_CRC_RESPONSE)
> #define MMC_ACMD51 (MMC_INDX(51) | MMC_CMD_WAIT_RESPONSE)
> @@ -152,6 +153,10 @@ typedef EFI_STATUS (EFIAPI *MMC_SETIOS) (
> IN UINT32 TimingMode
> );
>
> +typedef BOOLEAN (EFIAPI *MMC_ISMULTIBLOCK) (
> + IN EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL *This
> + );
> +
>
> struct _EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL {
>
> @@ -169,6 +174,7 @@ struct _EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL {
> MMC_WRITEBLOCKDATA WriteBlockData;
>
> MMC_SETIOS SetIos;
> + MMC_ISMULTIBLOCK IsMultiBlock;
>
> };
>
> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcBlockIo.c b/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcBlockIo.c
> index 0e1ef57..1fcb3b5 100644
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcBlockIo.c
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcBlockIo.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,95 @@ MmcStopTransmission (
> #define MMCI0_BLOCKLEN 512
> #define MMCI0_TIMEOUT 10000
>
> +STATIC EFI_STATUS
STATIC
EFI_STATUS
> +MmcTransferBlock (
> + IN EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL *This,
> + IN UINTN Cmd,
> + IN UINTN Transfer,
> + IN UINT32 MediaId,
> + IN EFI_LBA Lba,
> + IN UINTN BufferSize,
> + OUT VOID *Buffer
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + UINTN CmdArg;
> + INTN Timeout;
> + UINT32 Response[4];
> + MMC_HOST_INSTANCE *MmcHostInstance;
> + EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL *MmcHost;
> +
> + MmcHostInstance = MMC_HOST_INSTANCE_FROM_BLOCK_IO_THIS (This);
> + MmcHost = MmcHostInstance->MmcHost;
> +
> + //Set command argument based on the card access mode (Byte mode or Block mode)
> + if (MmcHostInstance->CardInfo.OCRData.AccessMode & BIT1) {
The code would be more readable if instead of BIT1 there was a
symbolic name of the flag we're testing for.
(OK, I see the code has been moved from elsewhere in this form, but it
would be good to make the code more clear.)
> + CmdArg = Lba;
> + } else {
> + CmdArg = Lba * This->Media->BlockSize;
> + }
> +
> + Status = MmcHost->SendCommand (MmcHost, Cmd, CmdArg);
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a(MMC_CMD%d): Error %r\n", __func__, Cmd, Status));
> + return Status;
> + }
> +
> + if (Transfer == MMC_IOBLOCKS_READ) {
> + // Read Data
> + Status = MmcHost->ReadBlockData (MmcHost, Lba, BufferSize, Buffer);
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_BLKIO, "%a(): Error Read Block Data and Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
> + MmcStopTransmission (MmcHost);
> + return Status;
> + }
> + Status = MmcNotifyState (MmcHostInstance, MmcProgrammingState);
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a() : Error MmcProgrammingState\n", __func__));
> + return Status;
> + }
> + } else {
> + // Write Data
> + Status = MmcHost->WriteBlockData (MmcHost, Lba, BufferSize, Buffer);
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_BLKIO, "%a(): Error Write Block Data and Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
> + MmcStopTransmission (MmcHost);
> + return Status;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + // Command 13 - Read status and wait for programming to complete (return to tran)
> + Timeout = MMCI0_TIMEOUT;
> + CmdArg = MmcHostInstance->CardInfo.RCA << 16;
> + Response[0] = 0;
> + while(!(Response[0] & MMC_R0_READY_FOR_DATA)
> + && (MMC_R0_CURRENTSTATE (Response) != MMC_R0_STATE_TRAN)
> + && Timeout--) {
> + Status = MmcHost->SendCommand (MmcHost, MMC_CMD13, CmdArg);
> + if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + MmcHost->ReceiveResponse (MmcHost, MMC_RESPONSE_TYPE_R1, Response);
> + if (Response[0] & MMC_R0_READY_FOR_DATA) {
> + break; // Prevents delay once finished
> + }
> + }
> + gBS->Stall (1);
Can you provide a comment of why this stall was chosen?
(Ah, again, moved code. Ignore.)
> + }
> +
> + if (BufferSize > This->Media->BlockSize) {
> + Status = MmcHost->SendCommand (MmcHost, MMC_CMD12, 0);
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_BLKIO, "%a(): Error and Status:%r\n", __func__, Status));
> + }
> + }
> +
> + Status = MmcNotifyState (MmcHostInstance, MmcTransferState);
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "MmcIoBlocks() : Error MmcTransferState\n"));
> + return Status;
> + }
> + return Status;
> +}
> +
> EFI_STATUS
> MmcIoBlocks (
> IN EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL *This,
> @@ -145,6 +234,7 @@ MmcIoBlocks (
> EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL *MmcHost;
> UINTN BytesRemainingToBeTransfered;
> UINTN BlockCount;
> + UINTN ConsumeSize;
>
> BlockCount = 1;
> MmcHostInstance = MMC_HOST_INSTANCE_FROM_BLOCK_IO_THIS (This);
> @@ -165,6 +255,10 @@ MmcIoBlocks (
> return EFI_NO_MEDIA;
> }
>
> + if (MmcHost->IsMultiBlock && MmcHost->IsMultiBlock(MmcHost)) {
> + BlockCount = (BufferSize + This->Media->BlockSize - 1) / This->Media->BlockSize;
> + }
> +
> // All blocks must be within the device
> if ((Lba + (BufferSize / This->Media->BlockSize)) > (This->Media->LastBlock + 1)) {
> return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> @@ -196,7 +290,7 @@ MmcIoBlocks (
> CmdArg = MmcHostInstance->CardInfo.RCA << 16;
> Response[0] = 0;
> Timeout = 20;
> - while( (!(Response[0] & MMC_R0_READY_FOR_DATA))
> + while(!(Response[0] & MMC_R0_READY_FOR_DATA)
This is cleanup, but it is unrelated to functional changes, so please
leave out.
> && (MMC_R0_CURRENTSTATE (Response) != MMC_R0_STATE_TRAN)
> && Timeout--) {
> Status = MmcHost->SendCommand (MmcHost, MMC_CMD13, CmdArg);
> @@ -210,75 +304,38 @@ MmcIoBlocks (
> return EFI_NOT_READY;
> }
>
> - //Set command argument based on the card access mode (Byte mode or Block mode)
> - if (MmcHostInstance->CardInfo.OCRData.AccessMode & BIT1) {
> - CmdArg = Lba;
> - } else {
> - CmdArg = Lba * This->Media->BlockSize;
> - }
> -
> if (Transfer == MMC_IOBLOCKS_READ) {
> - // Read a single block
> - Cmd = MMC_CMD17;
> - } else {
> - // Write a single block
> - Cmd = MMC_CMD24;
> - }
> - Status = MmcHost->SendCommand (MmcHost, Cmd, CmdArg);
> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "MmcIoBlocks(MMC_CMD%d): Error %r\n", Cmd, Status));
> - return Status;
> - }
> -
> - if (Transfer == MMC_IOBLOCKS_READ) {
> - // Read one block of Data
> - Status = MmcHost->ReadBlockData (MmcHost, Lba, This->Media->BlockSize, Buffer);
> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_BLKIO, "MmcIoBlocks(): Error Read Block Data and Status = %r\n", Status));
> - MmcStopTransmission (MmcHost);
> - return Status;
> - }
> - Status = MmcNotifyState (MmcHostInstance, MmcProgrammingState);
> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "MmcIoBlocks() : Error MmcProgrammingState\n"));
> - return Status;
> + if (BlockCount == 1) {
> + // Read a single block
> + Cmd = MMC_CMD17;
> + } else {
> + // Read multiple blocks
> + Cmd = MMC_CMD18;
> }
> } else {
> - // Write one block of Data
> - Status = MmcHost->WriteBlockData (MmcHost, Lba, This->Media->BlockSize, Buffer);
> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_BLKIO, "MmcIoBlocks(): Error Write Block Data and Status = %r\n", Status));
> - MmcStopTransmission (MmcHost);
> - return Status;
> + if (BlockCount == 1) {
> + // Write a single block
> + Cmd = MMC_CMD24;
> + } else {
> + // Write multiple blocks
> + Cmd = MMC_CMD25;
> }
> }
>
> - // Command 13 - Read status and wait for programming to complete (return to tran)
> - Timeout = MMCI0_TIMEOUT;
> - CmdArg = MmcHostInstance->CardInfo.RCA << 16;
> - Response[0] = 0;
> - while( (!(Response[0] & MMC_R0_READY_FOR_DATA))
> - && (MMC_R0_CURRENTSTATE (Response) != MMC_R0_STATE_TRAN)
> - && Timeout--) {
> - Status = MmcHost->SendCommand (MmcHost, MMC_CMD13, CmdArg);
> - if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - MmcHost->ReceiveResponse (MmcHost, MMC_RESPONSE_TYPE_R1, Response);
> - if ((Response[0] & MMC_R0_READY_FOR_DATA)) {
> - break; // Prevents delay once finished
> - }
> - }
> - gBS->Stall (1);
> + ConsumeSize = BlockCount * This->Media->BlockSize;
> + if (BytesRemainingToBeTransfered < ConsumeSize) {
> + ConsumeSize = BytesRemainingToBeTransfered;
> }
> -
> - Status = MmcNotifyState (MmcHostInstance, MmcTransferState);
> + Status = MmcTransferBlock (This, Cmd, Transfer, MediaId, Lba, ConsumeSize, Buffer);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "MmcIoBlocks() : Error MmcTransferState\n"));
> - return Status;
> + DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a(): Failed to transfer block and Status:%r\n", __func__, Status));
> }
>
> - BytesRemainingToBeTransfered -= This->Media->BlockSize;
> - Lba += BlockCount;
> - Buffer = (UINT8 *)Buffer + This->Media->BlockSize;
> + BytesRemainingToBeTransfered -= ConsumeSize;
> + if (BytesRemainingToBeTransfered > 0) {
> + Lba += BlockCount;
> + Buffer = (UINT8 *)Buffer + ConsumeSize;
> + }
> }
>
> return EFI_SUCCESS;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-13 6:47 [PATCH v5 0/9] enhance MMC Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] MmcDxe: wait OCR busy bit free Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] MmcDxe: move ECSD into CardInfo structure Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] MmcDxe: declare ECSD structure Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] MmcDxe: add SPEC_VERS field in CSD structure Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] MmcDxe: add interface to change io width and speed Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-14 16:12 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] MmcDxe: set io bus width before reading EXTCSD Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-14 16:36 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] MmcDxe: set iospeed and bus width in SD stack Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-14 17:08 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] MmcDxe: expand to support multiple blocks Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-14 17:15 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2016-11-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] PL180: update for indentifying SD Haojian Zhuang
2016-11-14 17:27 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] enhance MMC Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161114171525.GA27644@bivouac.eciton.net \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox