public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/14] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Add xen PVH specific code
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:18:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170110161848.GF1903@perard.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cc382af-45b2-c836-2907-98f066cca05b@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/08/16 16:33, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > - learn about memory size from the E820
> > - ignore error if host bridge devid is 0xffff, PVH does not have PCI and
> >   reading from unexisting device return -1.
> > 
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> > ---
> >  OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c  |  5 +++
> >  OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.h  | 10 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> > index 4ecdf5e..0d80775 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,70 @@ UINT8 mPhysMemAddressWidth;
> >  STATIC UINT32 mS3AcpiReservedMemoryBase;
> >  STATIC UINT32 mS3AcpiReservedMemorySize;
> >  
> > +STATIC UINT32 mXenLowerMemorySize = 0;
> > +STATIC UINT64 mXenHighMemorySize = 0;
> > +
> > +VOID
> > +XenReadMemorySizes (
> > +  VOID
> > +  )
> > +{
> > +  EFI_E820_ENTRY64  *E820Map;
> > +  UINT32            E820EntriesCount;
> > +  EFI_STATUS Status;
> > +
> > +  Status = XenGetE820Map (&E820Map, &E820EntriesCount);
> > +  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > +
> > +  mXenLowerMemorySize = 0;
> > +  mXenHighMemorySize = 0;
> > +
> > +  if (E820EntriesCount > 0) {
> > +    EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *Entry;
> > +    UINT32 Loop;
> > +
> > +    for (Loop = 0; Loop < E820EntriesCount; Loop++) {
> > +      Entry = E820Map + Loop;
> > +
> > +      //
> > +      // Only care about RAM
> > +      //
> > +      if (Entry->Type != EfiAcpiAddressRangeMemory) {
> > +        continue;
> > +      }
> > +
> > +      if ((Entry->BaseAddr + Entry->Length) <= SIZE_16MB) {
> > +        continue;
> > +      }
> > +
> > +      if (Entry->BaseAddr < SIZE_16MB) {
> > +        UINT64 bottom = Entry->BaseAddr;
> > +        UINT64 size = Entry->Length;
> > +        size -= SIZE_16MB - bottom;
> > +        bottom = SIZE_16MB;
> > +        mXenLowerMemorySize += size;
> > +        continue;
> > +      }
> > +      if (Entry->BaseAddr <= SIZE_4GB) {
> > +        UINT64 size = Entry->Length;
> > +        mXenLowerMemorySize += size;
> > +        continue;
> > +      }
> > +
> > +      if (Entry->BaseAddr == SIZE_4GB) {
> > +        mXenHighMemorySize = Entry->Length;
> > +        continue;
> > +      }
> > +
> > +      DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: ignored XenE820 entry (0x%llx, 0x%llx)\n",
> > +              __FUNCTION__,
> > +              Entry->BaseAddr,
> > +              Entry->Length));
> > +    }
> > +    mXenLowerMemorySize += SIZE_16MB;
> > +  }
> > +}
> > +
> >  UINT32
> >  GetSystemMemorySizeBelow4gb (
> >    VOID
> > @@ -50,6 +114,9 @@ GetSystemMemorySizeBelow4gb (
> >    UINT8 Cmos0x34;
> >    UINT8 Cmos0x35;
> >  
> > +  if (mXen && mXenLowerMemorySize)
> > +    return mXenLowerMemorySize;
> > +
> >    //
> >    // CMOS 0x34/0x35 specifies the system memory above 16 MB.
> >    // * CMOS(0x35) is the high byte
> > @@ -74,6 +141,10 @@ GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (
> >    UINT32 Size;
> >    UINTN  CmosIndex;
> >  
> > +  // if lower memory is specified that way, return also high memory
> > +  if (mXen && mXenLowerMemorySize)
> > +    return mXenHighMemorySize;
> > +
> >    //
> >    // CMOS 0x5b-0x5d specifies the system memory above 4GB MB.
> >    // * CMOS(0x5d) is the most significant size byte
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c
> > index bf78878..9fc713c 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c
> > @@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ MiscInitialization (
> >        AcpiCtlReg = POWER_MGMT_REGISTER_Q35 (ICH9_ACPI_CNTL);
> >        AcpiEnBit  = ICH9_ACPI_CNTL_ACPI_EN;
> >        break;
> > +    case 0xffff:
> > +      // xen PVH, ignore
> > +      PcdStatus = PcdSet16S (PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId, mHostBridgeDevId);
> > +      return;
> 
> Can we create a new macro for 0xFFFF in
> "OvmfPkg/Include/OvmfPlatforms.h", and use that here?
> 
> Normally I would suggest a separate header file under "OvmfPkg/Include",
> similar to "Q35MchIch9.h" and "I440FxPiix4.h", and to include that new
> file in "OvmfPlatforms.h", but here we only need a single "chipset
> identifier", so I guess that can go directly into "OvmfPlatforms.h".
> 
> I mainly suggest this because in patch 08/14, the same 0xFFFF case label
> is being added to code shared with QEMU, and using a verbose macro there
> is much better than a magic number. In turn, we should use the same
> macro here, I think.

This value is just the result of a read to an incorrect location, and
the return value is -1. There is no PCI when running in Xen PVH, at
least for now. I think I should try harder to find out if OVMF is
running in PVH, and so I would not need this case 0xffff at all.

-- 
Anthony PERARD


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-10 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-08 15:33 [PATCH RFC 00/14] Specific platform to run OVMF in Xen PVH and HVM guests Anthony PERARD
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 01/14] OvmfPkg: Create platform XenOvmf Anthony PERARD
2017-01-04 19:14   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 02/14] OvmfPkg/XenOvmf: Update debug IO port for Xen Anthony PERARD
2017-01-04 19:23   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 03/14] OvmfPkg/XenOvmf.dsc: Introduce XenResetVector Anthony PERARD
2017-01-04 19:49   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-01-10 15:58     ` Anthony PERARD
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 04/14] OvmfPkg: Introduce XenPlatformPei Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05  9:59   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-01-10 16:08     ` Anthony PERARD
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 05/14] OvmfPkg/Library: add XenPciHostBridgeLib Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 10:15   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 06/14] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Add xen PVH specific code Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 10:30   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-01-10 16:18     ` Anthony PERARD [this message]
2017-01-10 16:54       ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 07/14] OvmfPkg/XenResetVector: Add new entry point for Xen PVH Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 10:36   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 08/14] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Workaround missing PCI bus on " Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 10:38   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 09/14] OvmfPkg/ResetSystemLib: Add missing dependency on PciLib Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 10:46   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 10/14] UefiCpuPkg/BaseXApicX2ApicLib: Fix initialisation on my system and Anthony PERARD
2016-12-09  6:48   ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-12-12 12:38     ` Anthony PERARD
     [not found]     ` <58dbbeb0-f600-ef3f-7f8c-5c110b0aa809@citrix.com>
2016-12-12 12:40       ` [Xen-devel] " Anthony PERARD
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 11/14] OvmfPkg/XenOvmf: Adding XenTimerLocalApic Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 11:26   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 12/14] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Use a Xen console for ConOut/ConIn Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 16:38   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 13/14] OvmfPkg: Introduce XenIoPvhDxe to initialize Grant Tables Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 16:58   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 14/14] XenOvmf: Use a different RTC Anthony PERARD
2017-01-05 17:02   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-01-04 19:52 ` [PATCH RFC 00/14] Specific platform to run OVMF in Xen PVH and HVM guests Laszlo Ersek
2017-01-10 14:55   ` Anthony PERARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170110161848.GF1903@perard.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox