public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, jiewen.yao@intel.com,
	feng.tian@intel.com, michael.d.kinney@intel.com,
	jeff.fan@intel.com, star.zeng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: AARCH64: add support for modifying only permissions
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:16:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210181621.GP16034@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486661891-7888-5-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:38:11PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Since the new DXE page protection for PE/COFF images may invoke
> EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL.SetMemoryAttributes() with only permission
> attributes set, add support for this in the AARCH64 MMU code.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c | 73 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
> index 6aa970bc0514..764e54b5d747 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>  // We use this index definition to define an invalid block entry
>  #define TT_ATTR_INDX_INVALID    ((UINT32)~0)
>  
> +#define EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK   (EFI_MEMORY_UC | EFI_MEMORY_WC | \
> +                                     EFI_MEMORY_WT | EFI_MEMORY_WB | \
> +                                     EFI_MEMORY_UCE)
> +

This is already duplicated between

ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h
and
UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h

Can we avoid adding more?

>  STATIC
>  UINT64
>  ArmMemoryAttributeToPageAttribute (
> @@ -101,25 +105,46 @@ PageAttributeToGcdAttribute (
>    return GcdAttributes;
>  }
>  
> -ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTES
> -GcdAttributeToArmAttribute (
> +STATIC
> +UINT64
> +GcdAttributeToPageAttribute (
>    IN UINT64 GcdAttributes
>    )
>  {
> -  switch (GcdAttributes & 0xFF) {
> +  UINT64 PageAttributes;
> +
> +  switch (GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK) {
>    case EFI_MEMORY_UC:
> -    return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_DEVICE;
> +    PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_DEVICE_MEMORY;
> +    break;
>    case EFI_MEMORY_WC:
> -    return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_UNCACHED_UNBUFFERED;
> +    PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MEMORY_NON_CACHEABLE;
> +    break;
>    case EFI_MEMORY_WT:
> -    return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_THROUGH;
> +    PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MEMORY_WRITE_THROUGH | TT_SH_INNER_SHAREABLE;

These TT_SH additions look like a bugfix - should they be a separate commit?

> +    break;
>    case EFI_MEMORY_WB:
> -    return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK;
> +    PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MEMORY_WRITE_BACK | TT_SH_INNER_SHAREABLE;
> +    break;
>    default:
> -    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "GcdAttributeToArmAttribute: 0x%lX attributes is not supported.\n", GcdAttributes));
> -    ASSERT (0);
> -    return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_DEVICE;
> +    PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MASK;

OK, so you're doing the same thing here as in the ARM code.
This is a substantial change in behaviour (old behaviour: if unknown,
set to DEVICE; new behaviour: if unknown, set "all types permitted").
Am I missing something?

> +    break;
>    }
> +
> +  if ((GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_XP) != 0 ||
> +      (GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK) == EFI_MEMORY_UC) {
> +    if (ArmReadCurrentEL () == AARCH64_EL2) {
> +      PageAttributes |= TT_XN_MASK;
> +    } else {
> +      PageAttributes |= TT_UXN_MASK | TT_PXN_MASK;
> +    }
> +  }
> +
> +  if ((GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_RO) != 0) {
> +    PageAttributes |= TT_AP_RO_RO;
> +  }
> +
> +  return PageAttributes | TT_AF;
>  }
>  
>  #define MIN_T0SZ        16
> @@ -434,17 +459,31 @@ SetMemoryAttributes (
>    )
>  {
>    RETURN_STATUS                Status;
> -  ARM_MEMORY_REGION_DESCRIPTOR MemoryRegion;
>    UINT64                      *TranslationTable;
> -
> -  MemoryRegion.PhysicalBase = BaseAddress;
> -  MemoryRegion.VirtualBase = BaseAddress;
> -  MemoryRegion.Length = Length;
> -  MemoryRegion.Attributes = GcdAttributeToArmAttribute (Attributes);
> +  UINT64                       PageAttributes;
> +  UINT64                       PageAttributeMask;
> +
> +  PageAttributes = GcdAttributeToPageAttribute (Attributes);
> +  PageAttributeMask = 0;
> +
> +  if ((Attributes & EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK) == 0) {
> +    //
> +    // No memory type was set in Attributes, so we are going to update the
> +    // permissions only.
> +    //
> +    PageAttributes &= TT_AP_MASK | TT_UXN_MASK | TT_PXN_MASK;
> +    PageAttributeMask = ~(TT_ADDRESS_MASK_BLOCK_ENTRY | TT_AP_MASK |
> +                          TT_PXN_MASK | TT_XN_MASK);
> +  }
>  
>    TranslationTable = ArmGetTTBR0BaseAddress ();
>  
> -  Status = FillTranslationTable (TranslationTable, &MemoryRegion);
> +  Status = UpdateRegionMapping (
> +             TranslationTable,
> +             BaseAddress,
> +             Length,
> +             PageAttributes,
> +             PageAttributeMask);
>    if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>      return Status;
>    }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-10 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-09 17:38 [PATCH 0/4] ArmPkg: add groundwork for DXE image protection Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: Correct EFI_MEMORY_RO usage Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 18:17   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-10 18:25     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 19:36       ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: translate invalid memory types in EfiAttributeToArmAttribute Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 17:54   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-10 17:56     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: ARM: ignore page table updates that only change permissions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 17:59   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: AARCH64: add support for modifying only permissions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 18:16   ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2017-02-10 18:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-11 14:35       ` Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170210181621.GP16034@bivouac.eciton.net \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox