From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, jiewen.yao@intel.com,
feng.tian@intel.com, michael.d.kinney@intel.com,
jeff.fan@intel.com, star.zeng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: AARCH64: add support for modifying only permissions
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:16:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210181621.GP16034@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486661891-7888-5-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:38:11PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Since the new DXE page protection for PE/COFF images may invoke
> EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL.SetMemoryAttributes() with only permission
> attributes set, add support for this in the AARCH64 MMU code.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c | 73 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
> index 6aa970bc0514..764e54b5d747 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
> // We use this index definition to define an invalid block entry
> #define TT_ATTR_INDX_INVALID ((UINT32)~0)
>
> +#define EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK (EFI_MEMORY_UC | EFI_MEMORY_WC | \
> + EFI_MEMORY_WT | EFI_MEMORY_WB | \
> + EFI_MEMORY_UCE)
> +
This is already duplicated between
ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h
and
UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h
Can we avoid adding more?
> STATIC
> UINT64
> ArmMemoryAttributeToPageAttribute (
> @@ -101,25 +105,46 @@ PageAttributeToGcdAttribute (
> return GcdAttributes;
> }
>
> -ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTES
> -GcdAttributeToArmAttribute (
> +STATIC
> +UINT64
> +GcdAttributeToPageAttribute (
> IN UINT64 GcdAttributes
> )
> {
> - switch (GcdAttributes & 0xFF) {
> + UINT64 PageAttributes;
> +
> + switch (GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK) {
> case EFI_MEMORY_UC:
> - return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_DEVICE;
> + PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_DEVICE_MEMORY;
> + break;
> case EFI_MEMORY_WC:
> - return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_UNCACHED_UNBUFFERED;
> + PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MEMORY_NON_CACHEABLE;
> + break;
> case EFI_MEMORY_WT:
> - return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_THROUGH;
> + PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MEMORY_WRITE_THROUGH | TT_SH_INNER_SHAREABLE;
These TT_SH additions look like a bugfix - should they be a separate commit?
> + break;
> case EFI_MEMORY_WB:
> - return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK;
> + PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MEMORY_WRITE_BACK | TT_SH_INNER_SHAREABLE;
> + break;
> default:
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "GcdAttributeToArmAttribute: 0x%lX attributes is not supported.\n", GcdAttributes));
> - ASSERT (0);
> - return ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_DEVICE;
> + PageAttributes = TT_ATTR_INDX_MASK;
OK, so you're doing the same thing here as in the ARM code.
This is a substantial change in behaviour (old behaviour: if unknown,
set to DEVICE; new behaviour: if unknown, set "all types permitted").
Am I missing something?
> + break;
> }
> +
> + if ((GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_XP) != 0 ||
> + (GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK) == EFI_MEMORY_UC) {
> + if (ArmReadCurrentEL () == AARCH64_EL2) {
> + PageAttributes |= TT_XN_MASK;
> + } else {
> + PageAttributes |= TT_UXN_MASK | TT_PXN_MASK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if ((GcdAttributes & EFI_MEMORY_RO) != 0) {
> + PageAttributes |= TT_AP_RO_RO;
> + }
> +
> + return PageAttributes | TT_AF;
> }
>
> #define MIN_T0SZ 16
> @@ -434,17 +459,31 @@ SetMemoryAttributes (
> )
> {
> RETURN_STATUS Status;
> - ARM_MEMORY_REGION_DESCRIPTOR MemoryRegion;
> UINT64 *TranslationTable;
> -
> - MemoryRegion.PhysicalBase = BaseAddress;
> - MemoryRegion.VirtualBase = BaseAddress;
> - MemoryRegion.Length = Length;
> - MemoryRegion.Attributes = GcdAttributeToArmAttribute (Attributes);
> + UINT64 PageAttributes;
> + UINT64 PageAttributeMask;
> +
> + PageAttributes = GcdAttributeToPageAttribute (Attributes);
> + PageAttributeMask = 0;
> +
> + if ((Attributes & EFI_MEMORY_CACHETYPE_MASK) == 0) {
> + //
> + // No memory type was set in Attributes, so we are going to update the
> + // permissions only.
> + //
> + PageAttributes &= TT_AP_MASK | TT_UXN_MASK | TT_PXN_MASK;
> + PageAttributeMask = ~(TT_ADDRESS_MASK_BLOCK_ENTRY | TT_AP_MASK |
> + TT_PXN_MASK | TT_XN_MASK);
> + }
>
> TranslationTable = ArmGetTTBR0BaseAddress ();
>
> - Status = FillTranslationTable (TranslationTable, &MemoryRegion);
> + Status = UpdateRegionMapping (
> + TranslationTable,
> + BaseAddress,
> + Length,
> + PageAttributes,
> + PageAttributeMask);
> if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
> return Status;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-09 17:38 [PATCH 0/4] ArmPkg: add groundwork for DXE image protection Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: Correct EFI_MEMORY_RO usage Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 18:17 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-10 18:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 19:36 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: translate invalid memory types in EfiAttributeToArmAttribute Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 17:54 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-10 17:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: ARM: ignore page table updates that only change permissions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 17:59 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: AARCH64: add support for modifying only permissions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 18:16 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2017-02-10 18:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-11 14:35 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170210181621.GP16034@bivouac.eciton.net \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox