From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: drop double right shift in ADD/WRITE POINTER cmds
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:38:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221153812.1420-2-lersek@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170221153812.1420-1-lersek@redhat.com>
The Count parameter of RShiftU64() must be strictly smaller than 64.
ProcessCmdAddPointer() and ProcessCmdWritePointer() currently ensure this
by "cleverly" breaking the last bit of a potentially 8-byte right shift
out to a separate operation.
Instead, exclude the Count==64 case explicitly (in which case the
preexistent outer RShiftU64() would return 0), and keep only the inner
RShiftU64(), with the direct Count however.
This is not a functional change, just style improvement.
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c b/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c
index eadd690bef4e..6a0ecd1ad962 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c
+++ b/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c
@@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ ProcessCmdAddPointer (
ASSERT ((UINTN)Blob2->Base <= MAX_ADDRESS - Blob2->Size);
PointerValue += (UINT64)(UINTN)Blob2->Base;
- if (RShiftU64 (
- RShiftU64 (PointerValue, AddPointer->PointerSize * 8 - 1), 1) != 0) {
+ if (AddPointer->PointerSize < 8 &&
+ RShiftU64 (PointerValue, AddPointer->PointerSize * 8) != 0) {
DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: relocated pointer value unrepresentable in "
"\"%a\"\n", __FUNCTION__, AddPointer->PointerFile));
return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
@@ -438,8 +438,8 @@ ProcessCmdWritePointer (
ASSERT ((UINTN)PointeeBlob->Base <= MAX_ADDRESS - PointeeBlob->Size);
PointerValue += (UINT64)(UINTN)PointeeBlob->Base;
- if (RShiftU64 (
- RShiftU64 (PointerValue, WritePointer->PointerSize * 8 - 1), 1) != 0) {
+ if (WritePointer->PointerSize < 8 &&
+ RShiftU64 (PointerValue, WritePointer->PointerSize * 8) != 0) {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: pointer value unrepresentable in \"%a\"\n",
__FUNCTION__, WritePointer->PointerFile));
return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 15:38 [PATCH 0/6] OvmfPkg: AcpiPlatformDxe, QemuFwCfg: small cleanups after WRITE_POINTER Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-21 15:38 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-02-21 15:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: update PointerValue comments in "BootScript.c" Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-21 15:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] OvmfPkg/QemuFwCfgLib: move types/macros from lib class to IndustryStandard Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-21 15:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] OvmfPkg/QemuFwCfg: introduce FW_CFG_IO_SELECTOR, adapt the package Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-21 15:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] OvmfPkg/QemuFwCfg: introduce FW_CFG_IO_DATA, " Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-21 15:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] OvmfPkg/QemuFwCfg: introduce FW_CFG_IO_DMA_ADDRESS, " Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-22 1:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] OvmfPkg: AcpiPlatformDxe, QemuFwCfg: small cleanups after WRITE_POINTER Jordan Justen
2017-02-22 2:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170221153812.1420-2-lersek@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox