public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, ryan.harkin@linaro.org, eugene@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ArmPkg/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib: walk call stack unconditionally
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:07:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322130743.GX16034@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490043181-20031-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 08:53:00PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Currently, we only attempt to walk the call stack and print a backtrace
> if the program counter refers to a location covered by a PE/COFF image.
> However, regardless of the value of PC, the frame pointer may still have
> a meaningful value, and so we can still produce the remainder of the
> backtrace.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  ArmPkg/Library/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib/AArch64/DefaultExceptionHandler.c | 56 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib/AArch64/DefaultExceptionHandler.c b/ArmPkg/Library/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib/AArch64/DefaultExceptionHandler.c
> index 2f9c2ede37c1..1024bf48c63d 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib/AArch64/DefaultExceptionHandler.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib/AArch64/DefaultExceptionHandler.c
> @@ -181,37 +181,43 @@ DefaultExceptionHandler (
>        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "PC 0x%012lx (0x%012lx+0x%08x) [ 0] %a\n",
>          SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->ELR, ImageBase,
>          SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->ELR - ImageBase, BaseName (Pdb)));
> +    } else {
> +      DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "PC 0x%012lx\n", SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->ELR));
> +    }
>

come_from:

> -      if ((UINT64 *)SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP != 0) {
> -        Idx = 0;
> +    if ((UINT64 *)SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP != 0) {
> +      Idx = 0;
>  
> -        RootFp[0] = ((UINT64 *)SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP)[0];
> -        RootFp[1] = ((UINT64 *)SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP)[1];
> -        if (RootFp[1] != SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->LR) {
> -          RootFp[0] = SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP;
> -          RootFp[1] = SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->LR;
> -        }
> -        for (Fp = RootFp; Fp[0] != 0; Fp = (UINT64 *)Fp[0]) {
> -          Pdb = GetImageName (Fp[1], &ImageBase, &PeCoffSizeOfHeader);
> -          if (Pdb != NULL) {
> -            if (Pdb != PrevPdb) {
> -              Idx++;
> -              PrevPdb = Pdb;
> -            }
> -            DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "PC 0x%012lx (0x%012lx+0x%08x) [% 2d] %a\n",
> -              Fp[1], ImageBase, Fp[1] - ImageBase, Idx, BaseName (Pdb)));
> +      RootFp[0] = ((UINT64 *)SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP)[0];
> +      RootFp[1] = ((UINT64 *)SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP)[1];
> +      if (RootFp[1] != SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->LR) {
> +        RootFp[0] = SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->FP;
> +        RootFp[1] = SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->LR;
> +      }
> +      for (Fp = RootFp; Fp[0] != 0; Fp = (UINT64 *)Fp[0]) {
> +        Pdb = GetImageName (Fp[1], &ImageBase, &PeCoffSizeOfHeader);
> +        if (Pdb != NULL) {
> +          if (Pdb != PrevPdb) {
> +            Idx++;
> +            PrevPdb = Pdb;
>            }
> +          DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "PC 0x%012lx (0x%012lx+0x%08x) [% 2d] %a\n",
> +            Fp[1], ImageBase, Fp[1] - ImageBase, Idx, BaseName (Pdb)));

Diff's a bit iffy, but can you confirm there is no functional change
between come_from and here? Just the indentation shuffle?

> +        } else {
> +          DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "PC 0x%012lx\n", Fp[1]));
>          }
> -        PrevPdb = Pdb = GetImageName (SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->ELR, &ImageBase, &PeCoffSizeOfHeader);
> +      }
> +      PrevPdb = Pdb = GetImageName (SystemContext.SystemContextAArch64->ELR, &ImageBase, &PeCoffSizeOfHeader);
> +      if (Pdb != NULL) {
>          DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "\n[ 0] %a\n", Pdb));
> +      }
>  
> -        Idx = 0;
> -        for (Fp = RootFp; Fp[0] != 0; Fp = (UINT64 *)Fp[0]) {
> -          Pdb = GetImageName (Fp[1], &ImageBase, &PeCoffSizeOfHeader);
> -          if (Pdb != NULL && Pdb != PrevPdb) {
> -            DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "[% 2d] %a\n", ++Idx, Pdb));
> -            PrevPdb = Pdb;
> -          }
> +      Idx = 0;
> +      for (Fp = RootFp; Fp[0] != 0; Fp = (UINT64 *)Fp[0]) {
> +        Pdb = GetImageName (Fp[1], &ImageBase, &PeCoffSizeOfHeader);
> +        if (Pdb != NULL && Pdb != PrevPdb) {
> +          DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "[% 2d] %a\n", ++Idx, Pdb));
> +          PrevPdb = Pdb;
>          }
>        }
>      }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

If so:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>

/
    Leif


  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-22 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-20 20:52 [PATCH 0/3] ArmPkg: increase robustness of the crash handler Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-20 20:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] ArmPkg/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib: add missing GUID to .inf Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 13:01   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-03-20 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] ArmPkg/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib: walk call stack unconditionally Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 13:07   ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2017-03-22 13:12     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 13:20       ` Leif Lindholm
2017-03-20 20:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] ArmPkg/ArmExceptionLib: use EL0 stack for synchronous exceptions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 13:18   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-03-22 13:20     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-27 12:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-27 12:55       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170322130743.GX16034@bivouac.eciton.net \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox