public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: move PlatformHasAcpiGuid from EmbeddedPkg
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:38:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405153802.GQ25239@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_niW2tUMXZctF9fS_6mVNY8GAhEvH6JnzzK+dRA3aUTw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:01:05AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 5 April 2017 at 10:49, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 04/05/17 11:38, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> Given the agreement on the edk2-devel regarding the fact that the
> >> notion whether or not a 'platform has ACPI' is a universal one, move
> >> the PlatformHasAcpi GUID to MdeModulePkg.
> >>
> >> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf       | 1 +
> >>  ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf | 1 +
> >>  EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec                                    | 3 ---
> >>  EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf  | 1 +
> >>  {EmbeddedPkg => MdeModulePkg}/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h   | 0
> >>  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec                                  | 3 +++
> >>  6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
> >> index 08025f0c3722..5351e741aa41 100644
> >> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
> >> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
> >> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ [Sources]
> >>  [Packages]
> >>    ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPkg.dec
> >>    EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
> >> +  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> >>    MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
> >>    OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec
> >>
> >> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
> >> index 2833075f65c9..26965c50c12b 100644
> >> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
> >> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
> >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ [Sources]
> >>
> >>  [Packages]
> >>    EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
> >> +  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> >>    MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
> >>
> >>  [LibraryClasses]
> >> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec b/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
> >> index 0bed2736c8c3..a7e127085236 100644
> >> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
> >> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
> >> @@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ [Guids.common]
> >>    gFdtHobGuid   = { 0x16958446, 0x19B7, 0x480B, { 0xB0, 0x47, 0x74, 0x85, 0xAD, 0x3F, 0x71, 0x6D } }
> >>    gFdtVariableGuid = { 0x25a4fd4a, 0x9703, 0x4ba9, { 0xa1, 0x90, 0xb7, 0xc8, 0x4e, 0xfb, 0x3e, 0x57 } }
> >>
> >> -  ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
> >> -  gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid = { 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } }
> >> -
> >>    ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasDeviceTree.h
> >>    gEdkiiPlatformHasDeviceTreeGuid = { 0x7ebb920d, 0x1aaf, 0x46d9, { 0xb2, 0xaf, 0x54, 0x1e, 0x1d, 0xce, 0x14, 0x8b } }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf
> >> index 6268293ca97b..be298ba67c40 100644
> >> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf
> >> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ [Sources]
> >>
> >>  [Packages]
> >>    EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
> >
> > I think you can remove "EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec" here.
> >
> 
> Ah yes. It didn't occur to me to remove the 'home' package here, but I
> suppose this library doesn't depend on anything it provides.
> 
> > (
> >
> > I checked all the other INF files being modified as well; it seems that
> > "EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec" remains necessary in all other places.
> >
> > I also grepped all INF files for the GUID -- DtPlatformDxe.inf is
> > another user, but it needs no modification.
> >
> > )
> >
> > With that update (if it indeed works),
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Seconded.
(Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>)

/
    Leif


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05  9:38 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: move PlatformHasAcpiGuid from EmbeddedPkg Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-05  9:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-04-05 10:01   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-05 15:38     ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2017-04-05 16:01       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170405153802.GQ25239@bivouac.eciton.net \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox