From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AF822195FD51 for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017177F7B6; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:04:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 017177F7B6 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 017177F7B6 Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-86.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.86]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE1A7E5B7; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:04:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Laszlo Ersek To: edk2-devel-01 Cc: Jordan Justen , Ruiyu Ni Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:04:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20170518150427.16435-3-lersek@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170518150427.16435-1-lersek@redhat.com> References: <20170518150427.16435-1-lersek@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Thu, 18 May 2017 15:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PATCH 2/8] DuetPkg/FvbRuntimeService: correct NumOfLba vararg type in EraseBlocks() X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 15:04:41 -0000 According to the PI spec, Volume 3, EFI_FIRMWARE_VOLUME_BLOCK2_PROTOCOL.EraseBlocks(): > The variable argument list is a list of tuples. Each tuple describes a > range of LBAs to erase and consists of the following: > * An EFI_LBA that indicates the starting LBA > * A UINTN that indicates the number of blocks to erase (NB, in edk2, EFI_FIRMWARE_VOLUME_BLOCK_PROTOCOL is a typedef to EFI_FIRMWARE_VOLUME_BLOCK2_PROTOCOL.) In this driver, the NumOfLba local variable is defined with type UINTN, but the TYPE argument passed to VA_ARG() is UINT32. Fix the mismatch. Cc: Jordan Justen Cc: Ruiyu Ni Reported-by: Jordan Justen Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek --- Notes: unbuilt, untested DuetPkg/FvbRuntimeService/FWBlockService.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/DuetPkg/FvbRuntimeService/FWBlockService.c b/DuetPkg/FvbRuntimeService/FWBlockService.c index e0ddbd53121b..bc663273d4ce 100644 --- a/DuetPkg/FvbRuntimeService/FWBlockService.c +++ b/DuetPkg/FvbRuntimeService/FWBlockService.c @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ Returns: break; } - NumOfLba = VA_ARG (args, UINT32); + NumOfLba = VA_ARG (args, UINTN); // // Check input parameters @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ Returns: break; } - NumOfLba = VA_ARG (args, UINT32); + NumOfLba = VA_ARG (args, UINTN); while (NumOfLba > 0) { Status = FvbEraseBlock (FvbDevice->Instance, StartingLba, mFvbModuleGlobal, EfiGoneVirtual ()); -- 2.9.3