From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C4721D49C8E for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:05:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id m85so30421198wma.0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xv+i3bRKy7Zz2EPveIdGHcZ4KC5gQwnoeK/gptmDVbI=; b=Rr9mVjlXWa1vSu3exa/z/6/kNqH8yeaSSr/QSV+7BRVFPc3UxRY6HWyLLRIlIAHGab 2pZ1LtxBCgd6hilUWNDrhM9uAbXgpBuR1bOuwQvkm/3Xmz480RX6/dBqiPmRgT77eR05 Fq2Mi83m1uG9Mut88WA9i0jziPEMJXy3g6OIY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xv+i3bRKy7Zz2EPveIdGHcZ4KC5gQwnoeK/gptmDVbI=; b=jC0a1ZQUQUWPGgE1I/3gD5ABzrGtlg3HH1Qx8Uq1m4i84IzMMmm9CEY+V7HNZTKmgy g153kRHs6kdTtVGuy6AZnUvpZ9G7+EKpJZ0qNWQgTnmFBKbkEEq/2A6GuTgrAB7aOEvj 9cnLQ2LSdQMzAYApbGQzISJvdZ0eQKV4Nfr/JiqwLo1neT/lrQ5VS1HgysvcWKTYvF5o 5LsjTkzVcc1VMcATQIqTsF0eKWsn4Mi2k08r0M6TSO4Dcf+8VhZ9JAuMOzsdYaHwTX+G NzEI6+n5VyLLAqGQgBa7TrsQI67aeSOu2/edCH3MzUyCJ38kAHJpTr8wVV7iTSv1Rp6Z iWAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jp0/CAqmbrvW67c5X0h+pzVunp+gp1HMOQSU9GBDJ4wRPgu+Wi cjXrJNets9eoLlhK X-Received: by 10.28.102.132 with SMTP id a126mr8491399wmc.5.1502406495433; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bivouac.eciton.net (bivouac.eciton.net. [2a00:1098:0:86:1000:23:0:2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n184sm6173069wme.33.2017.08.10.16.08.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:08:13 +0100 From: Leif Lindholm To: Jordan Justen Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, Andrew Fish , Michael D Kinney Message-ID: <20170810230813.jbk6b52ln7c7ahor@bivouac.eciton.net> References: <20170810221129.7383-1-jordan.l.justen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170810221129.7383-1-jordan.l.justen@intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Maintainers.txt: List Tianocore Stewards X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:05:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I don't actually have a strong opinion that the number of maintainers per package need to be kept at 2, and I'm not sure we have actually codified that anywhere. But I also don't have any issues with any of the changes suggested in this series. So, in order to keep the noise down, for the series: Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:11:27PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: > Cc: Andrew Fish > Cc: Leif Lindholm > Cc: Michael D Kinney > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen > --- > Maintainers.txt | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Maintainers.txt b/Maintainers.txt > index 9d1b9fb941..a5e2e0af46 100644 > --- a/Maintainers.txt > +++ b/Maintainers.txt > @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ T: git (mirror) - https://bitbucket.org/tianocore/edk2.git > T: git (mirror) - http://git.code.sf.net/p/tianocore/edk2 > T: svn (read-only, deprecated) - https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2 > > +Tianocore Stewards > +------------------ > +M: Andrew Fish > +M: Leif Lindholm > +M: Michael D Kinney > + > Responsible Disclosure, Reporting Security Issues > ------------------------------------------------- > W: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Security > -- > 2.14.0 >