public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableSmm: fix MOR / MorLock inconsistency
Date: Tue,  3 Oct 2017 23:28:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003212834.25740-1-lersek@redhat.com> (raw)

Repo:   https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
Branch: mor_lock_init_at_end_of_dxe

This patch set fixes the issue reported in the following items:

* Inconsistent MOR control variables exposed by OVMF, breaks Windows
  Device Guard

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496170

* VariableSmm MorLockInit(): create MORLock only if / after MOR exists

  https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727

Patches #1 through #3 are cleanups.

Patch #4 is a small helper patch for patch #5.

Patch #5 is the actual fix, following Jiewen's suggestions from the
edk2-devel thread

* [edk2] multiple levels of support for MOR / MORLock

  https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-September/015444.html
  https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-October/015530.html

Patch #6 is a workaround for some OSes (minimally Fedora 24-26, and some
Debian versions) that create the MOR variable even if the platform
doesn't offer it up-front. This patch also follows Jiewen's suggestion
from the same edk2-devel thread.

(

BTW, at Paolo's recommendation, I've now reported this kernel issue for
Fedora, under

* incorrect downstream-only Platform Reset Attack Mitigation patch in
  the F24-F26 kernels

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498159

)

I've checked this set for basic regressions, using OVMF, normal boot and
S3 suspend/resume:

* Q35, SMM, IA32:
  - Fedora 25 -- verified patch #6 specifically

* i440fx, no SMM, X64:
  - Fedora 24

* Q35, SMM, IA32X64:
  - Fedora 26 -- verified patch #6 specifically
  - Windows 7
  - Windows 8.1
  - Windows 10
  - Windows Server 2008 R2
  - Windows Server 2012 R2

I didn't / couldn't test this set in the following two environments:

- on platforms where TcgMor.inf is included in the firmware, and the MOR
  variable exists genuinely,

- in the nested virt setup where Ladi reported the Device Guard
  breakage. (If I understand correctly, ATM this requires additional
  host kernel (KVM) patches.)

Test results / feedback from those envs would be appreciated.

Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>

Thanks,
Laszlo

Laszlo Ersek (6):
  MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move SecureBootHook() decl to new
    header
  MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move MOR func. declarations to
    header
  MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: introduce MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe()
    hook
  MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: permit MorLock deletion for passthru
    req
  MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: delay MorLock creation until
    EndOfDxe
  MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: delete and lock OS-created MOR
    variable

 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Measurement.c             |   2 +
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/PrivilegePolymorphic.h    |  89 ++++++++++
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockDxe.c           |  45 +++--
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c           | 173 ++++++++++++++++++--
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.c                |  51 ------
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h                |   2 +
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableDxe.c             |   2 +
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableRuntimeDxe.inf    |   1 +
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c             |   2 +
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.inf           |   4 +
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmmRuntimeDxe.c   |  16 +-
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmmRuntimeDxe.inf |   1 +
 12 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/PrivilegePolymorphic.h

-- 
2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b



             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-03 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 21:28 Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-10-03 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move SecureBootHook() decl to new header Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-03 21:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move MOR func. declarations to header Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-09  6:55   ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-09 12:47     ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-03 21:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: introduce MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() hook Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-03 21:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: permit MorLock deletion for passthru req Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-03 21:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: delay MorLock creation until EndOfDxe Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-03 21:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: delete and lock OS-created MOR variable Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-09  7:12   ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-09 15:20     ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-10  4:15       ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-10 13:14         ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-04  1:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableSmm: fix MOR / MorLock inconsistency Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-04 10:39   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-04 12:24     ` Ladi Prosek
2017-10-10  4:17     ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-10 10:09       ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-10 12:16         ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-05  7:42 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-05  7:57   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-05  9:12     ` Yao, Jiewen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171003212834.25740-1-lersek@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox