From: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
To: "Zhang, Chao B" <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, qin.long@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SecurityPkg:AuthVariableLib:Fix GCC build error
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:10:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017021000.jen67cir7wrqpxfj@GaryWorkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171016140829.59124-1-chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:08:29PM +0800, Zhang, Chao B wrote:
> Fix GCC build error
>
> Cc: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
> Cc: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c b/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c
> index 7188ff6..1e7872a 100644
> --- a/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c
> +++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/AuthService.c
> @@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ CalculatePrivAuthVarSignChainSHA256Digest(
> //
> // Get SignerCert CommonName
> //
> - Status = X509GetCommonName(SignerCert, SignerCertSize, CertCommonName, &CertCommonNameSize);
> + Status = X509GetCommonName(SignerCert, SignerCertSize, (CHAR8 *)CertCommonName, &CertCommonNameSize);
Hi Chao Zhang,
Although casting also silences the warning, why not declare
CertCommonName as CHAR8 directly? The only signedness check happens
in X509GetCommonName(). Sha256Update() requests "VOID *" so the
signedness doesn't matter. Besides, AsciiStrLen() also requests
CHAR8, so declaring CertCommonName as CHAR8 can remove the casting
altogether. What do you think?
Gary Lin
> if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
> DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "%a Get SignerCert CommonName failed with status %x\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
> return EFI_ABORTED;
> --
> 1.9.5.msysgit.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 14:08 [PATCH] SecurityPkg:AuthVariableLib:Fix GCC build error Zhang, Chao B
2017-10-17 2:10 ` Gary Lin [this message]
2017-10-17 8:53 ` Long, Qin
2017-10-17 14:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171017021000.jen67cir7wrqpxfj@GaryWorkstation \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox