public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe] Why do we delay 2s for ESC being pressed?
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:07:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171108090713.5hof77t5l3gikpwk@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc970b4b-7e3b-0590-b151-3a5b1d2aa748@linaro.org>

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:44:37PM +0800, Heyi Guo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 11/8/2017 4:34 PM, Ni, Ruiyu 写道:
> > No.
> > Even a terminal tool can recognize F10, it still needs to translate it into "ESC [ V"
> > and send the three bytes to firmware.
> Got it. But the 2 seconds timeout is not for this situation, right? If
> terminal tool could translate and send the key sequence, I think it can
> complete 3 bytes transfer in a very short time, isn't it? E.g. 9600 baud / 8
> = 1200 Bytes/s (ignore control bits).
> 
> So 2 seconds timeout is still for user to enter the sequence "ESC [ V"
> manually?

No.  Alot of software has this kind of delay because it is recommended
in some classic unix documentation to avoid mis-interpreting incomplete
terminal control sequences coming from slow terminals.

Where a "slow terminal" which actually would need such a long delay is a
physical terminal from the 70ies of the last century, or a virtual
terminal hooked up over a *really* slow network connection.

Reducing the delay from 2 seconds to roughly 0.2 seconds should be
pretty safe, things are not that slow any more these days :)

HTH,
  Gerd



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-08  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-08  7:04 [MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe] Why do we delay 2s for ESC being pressed? Heyi Guo
2017-11-08  7:24 ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-08  7:55   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-11-08  8:30     ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08  8:34       ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-11-08  8:44         ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08  8:46           ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-11-08  8:51             ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08  9:07           ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2017-11-08 13:34             ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08 16:00               ` Brian J. Johnson
2017-11-24  7:21                 ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-28 17:55                   ` Brian J. Johnson
2017-11-29  4:18                     ` Andrew Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171108090713.5hof77t5l3gikpwk@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox