public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg ArmVirtPkg: reorganize PL011 code
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:12:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171116181225.a5onmayzuwbuajns@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-AyeHHDmn3HyZ_NN4Sapa_ir3bbd--mZXa7hDJSgz5Hw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:38:10PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 16 November 2017 at 17:36, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:12:16PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> The PL011 code in ArmPlatformPkg is organized in a weird way: there is
> >> a single PL011Uart.h header file under Include/Drivers containing both
> >> register definitions and function entry points. The PL011Uart library
> >> itself is in Drivers/ but it is actually a library.
> >>
> >> So let's clean this up: add a new PL011UartLib library class and associated
> >> header file containing only the library prototypes, and move the library
> >> itself under Library/ using a new GUID, with the register definitions moved
> >> into a local header file.
> >>
> >> Note that we need to retain the old implementation for out of tree
> >> platforms,
> >
> > s/need to//
> >
> > Do we need to?
> 
> At least until we switch over edk2-platforms, yes.

Sure, but given the people involved (when available) are the same at
both ends, this kind of thing can be done near-atomically enough that
I'm happy to buy everyone caught out a beer and apologise.

(This is not to be considered further feedback on this set, but
stating an opinion for potential similar situations in future.)

/
    Leif


      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-16 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16 17:12 [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg ArmVirtPkg: reorganize PL011 code Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 17:36 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-11-16 17:38   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 18:12     ` Leif Lindholm [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171116181225.a5onmayzuwbuajns@bivouac.eciton.net \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox