From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9E5221523B3 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:43:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562BDC02C738; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-171.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.171]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F8D6F438; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 19:47:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Laszlo Ersek To: edk2-devel-01 Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Dong , Jiewen Yao , Liming Gao , Star Zeng Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:47:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20171204194743.15245-1-lersek@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 04 Dec 2017 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe: log informative memprotect msgs at DEBUG_INFO level X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 19:43:19 -0000 In commit 7eb927db3e25 ("MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: implement memory protection policy", 2017-02-24), we added two informative messages with the InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy() function: > InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy: applying strict permissions to > active memory regions and > InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy: applying strict permissions to > inactive memory regions The messages don't report errors or warnings, thus downgrade their log masks from DEBUG_ERROR to DEBUG_INFO. Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Eric Dong Cc: Jiewen Yao Cc: Liming Gao Cc: Star Zeng Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520485 Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek --- MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c index 21a52d0af55a..a74cfc137a22 100644 --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c @@ -831,8 +831,11 @@ InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy ( } while (Status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL); ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status); - DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: applying strict permissions to active memory regions\n", - __FUNCTION__)); + DEBUG (( + DEBUG_INFO, + "%a: applying strict permissions to active memory regions\n", + __FUNCTION__ + )); MergeMemoryMapForProtectionPolicy (MemoryMap, &MemoryMapSize, DescriptorSize); @@ -856,9 +859,11 @@ InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy ( // accessible, but have not been added to the UEFI memory map (yet). // if (GetPermissionAttributeForMemoryType (EfiConventionalMemory) != 0) { - DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, + DEBUG (( + DEBUG_INFO, "%a: applying strict permissions to inactive memory regions\n", - __FUNCTION__)); + __FUNCTION__ + )); CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock (); -- 2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b