From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms] Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer: add configurable eMMC support
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:52:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180130125213.gtyhz2nirprz4gjt@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8kpxTU9yG8nd6qmH7QzPQdN+pz+0jgjdfqHR1OVhKvBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:52:41AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> +STATIC
> >> >> +EFI_STATUS
> >> >> +EFIAPI
> >> >> +SynQuacerSdMmcCapability (
> >> >> + IN EFI_HANDLE ControllerHandle,
> >> >> + IN UINT8 Slot,
> >> >> + IN OUT VOID *SdMmcHcSlotCapability
> >> >> + )
> >> >> +{
> >> >> + UINT64 Capability;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + if (ControllerHandle != mSdMmcControllerHandle || Slot != 0) {
> >> >
> >> > This test pattern repeats below, does it suggest a macro?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't see how that would clear things up tbh, and the pattern occurs
> >> only twice
> >>
> >> #define IS_OUR_QUIRKY_SDMMC_CONTROLLER(Handle, Slot) \
> >> ((Handle) == mSdMmcControllerHandle && (Slot) == 0)
> >>
> >> if (!IS_OUR_QUIRKY_SDMMC_CONTROLLER(ControllerHandle, Slot) {
> >> return EFI_SUCCESS;
> >> }
> >>
> >> I can change it if you want, or add a comment if the condition is not
> >> self-explanatory enough.
> >
> > It's just an awful lot of logical operations on a single line.
> > 'ControllerHandle != mSdMmcControllerHandle' is reasonably easy to
> > figure out, but '|| Slot != 0' looks a bit random there.
> >
> > A comment would be sufficient.
> >
> > Another option would be to reduce the number of logical operations by
> > two by doing
> > if (ControllerHandle == mSdMmcControllerHandle && Slot == 0) {
> > and doing the body inside the if-statement.
> >
> > That's a bit uglier in the next function, but I would expect it
> > follows the paradigm of "handle most likely case first"?
> >
>
> Actually, come to think of it, the slot number is completely
> redundant. The non-discoverable SDHCI controller we expose only
> implements a single slot, so something is terribly wrong if
> ControllerHandle == mSdMmcControllerHandle && Slot != 0.
>
> So I will reduce the sequence to
>
> if (ControllerHandle != mSdMmcControllerHandle) {
> return EFI_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> ASSERT (Slot == 0);
>
> instead. Ok?
Sure, that works for me.
With that (in both places), and the indentation fix:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 10:32 [PATCH edk2-platforms] Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer: add configurable eMMC support Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-30 11:00 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-01-30 11:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-30 11:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-01-30 11:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-30 12:52 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2018-01-30 13:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180130125213.gtyhz2nirprz4gjt@bivouac.eciton.net \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox