From: Guo Heyi <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Guo Heyi <heyi.guo@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: recursive call of BmRepairAllControllers
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 16:47:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180224084725.GC111715@SZX1000114654> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BBC02C2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sure.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 08:40:20AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Will you submit a patch for this change?
>
> Thanks/Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guo Heyi [mailto:heyi.guo@linaro.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2018 4:29 PM
> > To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Guo Heyi <heyi.guo@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Zeng, Star
> > <star.zeng@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: recursive call of
> > BmRepairAllControllers
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 04:20:52PM +0800, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> > > On 2/24/2018 2:23 PM, Guo Heyi wrote:
> > > >Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > >In BmDriverHealth.c, function BmRepairAllControllers may recursively
> > > >call itself if some driver health protocol returns
> > EfiDriverHealthStatusReconnectRequired.
> > > >However, if there is something wrong in some 3rd party driver (e.g.
> > > >PCI oprom), the driver health protocol of that driver may always
> > > >return such status even after one and another reconnect. The endless
> > > >iteration will cause stack overflow and then system exception, and it
> > > >may be not easy to find that the exception is actually caused by stack
> > overflow.
> > >
> > > yes. I agree.
> > > If a buggy PCI oprom always return ReconnectRequired, the stack
> > > overflow will happen.
> > >
> > > How about we choose maximum recursive call depth as 10 and continue to
> > > boot if call depth reaches 11?
> >
> > That's fine for me :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gary (Heyi Guo)
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >So does it make sense to set a maximum count of this recursive call
> > > >to avoid whole system hang even there is a buggy 3rd party driver?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >Gary (Heyi Guo)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ray
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-24 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-24 6:23 MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: recursive call of BmRepairAllControllers Guo Heyi
2018-02-24 8:20 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-02-24 8:28 ` Guo Heyi
2018-02-24 8:40 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-02-24 8:47 ` Guo Heyi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180224084725.GC111715@SZX1000114654 \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox