From: Guo Heyi <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>,
edk2-devel@lists.01.org, Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: limit recursive call depth
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 08:48:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227004830.GA2261@SZX1000114654> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e02a30-217e-4b03-dde0-ee064cd12706@redhat.com>
Hi Laszlo,
I agree the current patch makes the code ugly, and turning the logic into a
normal loop should be the perfect solution. If Ray also agrees on it, I can try
to do that.
Thanks and regards,
Heyi
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:23:29PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/26/18 09:29, Heyi Guo wrote:
> > Function BmRepairAllControllers may recursively call itself if some
> > driver health protocol returns EfiDriverHealthStatusReconnectRequired.
> > However, driver health protocol of some buggy third party driver may
> > always return such status even after one and another reconnect. The
> > endless iteration will cause stack overflow and then system exception,
> > and it may be not easy to find that the exception is actually caused
> > by stack overflow.
> >
> > So we limit the number of reconnect retry to 10 to improve code
> > robustness.
>
> Not really my place to comment on this, but how about removing the
> recursion entirely, and turning the logic into a normal (iterative) loop
> instead?
>
> (1) Rename the current function to:
>
> STATIC
> VOID
> BmRepairAllControllersWorker (
> OUT BOOLEAN *ReconnectRequired,
> OUT BOOLEAN *RebootRequired
> );
>
>
> (2) The worker function should end right before
>
> if (ReconnectRequired) {
> BmRepairAllControllers ();
> }
>
>
> (3) The worker function should not contain
>
> RebootRequired = FALSE;
> ReconnectRequired = FALSE;
>
> Such initialization should be left to the caller.
>
>
> (4) The worker function should be called in a loop from a new
> BmRepairAllControllers() function, like this:
>
> Reconnect = 0;
> RebootRequired = FALSE;
> do {
> ReconnectRequired = FALSE;
> BmRepairAllControllersWorker (&ReconnectRequired, &RebootRequired);
> ++Reconnect;
> } while (ReconnectRequired && Reconnect < MAX_RECONNECT_REPAIR);
>
> DEBUG_CODE (...);
>
> if (RebootRequired) {
> ...
> }
>
>
> In addition to eliminating the shoddy recursive call (and the shoddier
> global counter, ewww :) ), this would fix the following other warts with
> the code:
>
> - When a nested call chain is unwound, we currently dump a series of
> "driver health info" lists (assuming no reboot is required), in the
> DEBUG_CODE section. I would argue that we should do that only once, at
> the end. (Even if we have to do it multiple times, it can be moved into
> the worker function, to the end.)
>
> - It seems to be sufficient to accumulate RebootRequired into one
> variable (i.e. not multiple instances of the same local variable on the
> stack) and to act upon it at the very end.
>
>
> Feel free to ignore my comments -- I just think we should be moving in
> the opposite direction; that is, away from recursion (especially from
> recursion combined with global variables -- that's one difficult pattern
> to reason about).
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/InternalBm.h | 6 ++++++
> > MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmDriverHealth.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/InternalBm.h b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/InternalBm.h
> > index 25a1d522fe84..9aa86b096525 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/InternalBm.h
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/InternalBm.h
> > @@ -108,6 +108,12 @@ CHAR16 *
> > #define BM_OPTION_NAME_LEN sizeof ("PlatformRecovery####")
> > extern CHAR16 *mBmLoadOptionName[];
> >
> > +//
> > +// Maximum number of reconnect retry to repair controller; it is to limit the
> > +// number of recursive call of BmRepairAllControllers.
> > +//
> > +#define MAX_RECONNECT_REPAIR 10
> > +
> > /**
> > Visitor function to be called by BmForEachVariable for each variable
> > in variable storage.
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmDriverHealth.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmDriverHealth.c
> > index ddcee8b0676f..30d70f32af84 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmDriverHealth.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmDriverHealth.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ GLOBAL_REMOVE_IF_UNREFERENCED
> > L"Reboot Required"
> > };
> >
> > +//
> > +// Counter of reconnect retry to repair controller; it is to limit the
> > +// number of recursive call of BmRepairAllControllers.
> > +//
> > +STATIC UINTN mReconnectRepairCount;
> > +
> > /**
> > Return the controller name.
> >
> > @@ -549,7 +555,16 @@ BmRepairAllControllers (
> >
> >
> > if (ReconnectRequired) {
> > - BmRepairAllControllers ();
> > + if (mReconnectRepairCount < MAX_RECONNECT_REPAIR) {
> > + mReconnectRepairCount++;
> > + BmRepairAllControllers ();
> > + } else {
> > + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "[%a:%d] Repair failed after %d retries.\n",
> > + __FUNCTION__, __LINE__, mReconnectRepairCount));
> > + // Reset counter so that it will not affect calling
> > + // BmRepairAllControllers() somewhere else
> > + mReconnectRepairCount = 0;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > DEBUG_CODE (
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 8:29 [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: limit recursive call depth Heyi Guo
2018-02-26 8:56 ` Wang, Sunny (HPS SW)
2018-02-26 11:34 ` Guo Heyi
2018-02-27 2:47 ` Wang, Sunny (HPS SW)
2018-02-26 16:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-27 0:48 ` Guo Heyi [this message]
2018-02-27 5:48 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-02-27 10:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-27 10:39 ` Guo Heyi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-01 2:39 Heyi Guo
2018-03-01 2:43 ` Guo Heyi
2018-03-01 4:46 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-03-07 1:54 ` Guo Heyi
2018-03-08 2:53 ` Ni, Ruiyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227004830.GA2261@SZX1000114654 \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox