From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com,
udit.kumar@nxp.com, meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPeiLib: mark primary FV region as boot services data
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:03:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228150311.h362ivdrpujqfh6w@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180102155034.13688-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:50:34PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Commit 8ae5fc182941 ("ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPeiLib: don't reserve
> primary FV in memory") deleted the code that removes the memory covering
> the primary firmware volume from the memory map. The assumption was that
> this is no longer necessary now that we no longer expose compression and
> PE/COFF loader library code from the PrePi module to DXE core.
>
> However, the FV is still declared, and so code may attempt to access it
> anyway, which may cause unexpected results depending on whether the
> memory has been reused for other purposes in the mean time.
>
> So reinstate the code that splits off the resource descriptor HOB that
> describes the firmware device, but this time, don't mark the memory as
> unusable, but create a memory allocation HOB that marks the region as
> boot services data.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
So, this looks like a necessary fix.
However, there are many line-length violations below.
And it's not apparent how fixing that would make the code more
readable.
So rather than asking for a rewrite - could you split the revert
from the modification?
/
Leif
> Vladimir, Udit, Meenakshi: please confirm whether this code works for you.
>
> ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c b/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> index d03214b5df66..d1b5c0be9497 100644
> --- a/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,11 @@ MemoryPeim (
> {
> ARM_MEMORY_REGION_DESCRIPTOR *MemoryTable;
> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE ResourceAttributes;
> + UINT64 ResourceLength;
> EFI_PEI_HOB_POINTERS NextHob;
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS FdTop;
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS SystemMemoryTop;
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS ResourceTop;
> BOOLEAN Found;
>
> // Get Virtual Memory Map from the Platform Library
> @@ -117,6 +121,76 @@ MemoryPeim (
> );
> }
>
> + //
> + // Reserve the memory space occupied by the firmware volume
> + //
> +
> + SystemMemoryTop = (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemoryBase) + (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemorySize);
> + FdTop = (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress) + (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)PcdGet32 (PcdFdSize);
> +
> + // EDK2 does not have the concept of boot firmware copied into DRAM. To avoid the DXE
> + // core to overwrite this area we must create a memory allocation HOB for the region,
> + // but this only works if we split off the underlying resource descriptor as well.
> + if ((PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress) >= PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemoryBase)) && (FdTop <= SystemMemoryTop)) {
> + Found = FALSE;
> +
> + // Search for System Memory Hob that contains the firmware
> + NextHob.Raw = GetHobList ();
> + while ((NextHob.Raw = GetNextHob (EFI_HOB_TYPE_RESOURCE_DESCRIPTOR, NextHob.Raw)) != NULL) {
> + if ((NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceType == EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) &&
> + (PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress) >= NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart) &&
> + (FdTop <= NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart + NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength))
> + {
> + ResourceAttributes = NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceAttribute;
> + ResourceLength = NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength;
> + ResourceTop = NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart + ResourceLength;
> +
> + if (PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress) == NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart) {
> + if (SystemMemoryTop != FdTop) {
> + // Create the System Memory HOB for the firmware with the non-present attribute
> + BuildResourceDescriptorHob (EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> + ResourceAttributes,
> + PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress),
> + PcdGet32 (PcdFdSize));
> +
> + // Top of the FD is system memory available for UEFI
> + NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart += PcdGet32(PcdFdSize);
> + NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength -= PcdGet32(PcdFdSize);
> + }
> + } else {
> + // Create the System Memory HOB for the firmware
> + BuildResourceDescriptorHob (EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> + ResourceAttributes,
> + PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress),
> + PcdGet32 (PcdFdSize));
> +
> + // Update the HOB
> + NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength = PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress) - NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart;
> +
> + // If there is some memory available on the top of the FD then create a HOB
> + if (FdTop < NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart + ResourceLength) {
> + // Create the System Memory HOB for the remaining region (top of the FD)
> + BuildResourceDescriptorHob (EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> + ResourceAttributes,
> + FdTop,
> + ResourceTop - FdTop);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + // Mark the memory covering the Firmware Device as boot services data
> + BuildMemoryAllocationHob (PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress),
> + PcdGet32 (PcdFdSize),
> + EfiBootServicesData);
> +
> + Found = TRUE;
> + break;
> + }
> + NextHob.Raw = GET_NEXT_HOB (NextHob);
> + }
> +
> + ASSERT(Found);
> + }
> +
> // Build Memory Allocation Hob
> InitMmu (MemoryTable);
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 15:50 [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPeiLib: mark primary FV region as boot services data Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-02 20:42 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2018-01-03 5:09 ` Udit Kumar
2018-01-03 7:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-01 11:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-28 15:03 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2018-02-28 15:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180228150311.h362ivdrpujqfh6w@bivouac.eciton.net \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox