* [Patch 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant CpuStateFinished State.
2018-07-25 3:57 [Patch V2 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs Eric Dong
@ 2018-07-25 3:57 ` Eric Dong
2018-07-25 3:57 ` [Patch 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove StartCount and volatile definition Eric Dong
2018-07-25 3:57 ` [Patch 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Not use disabled AP when call StartAllAPs Eric Dong
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dong @ 2018-07-25 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: edk2-devel; +Cc: Laszlo Ersek, Ruiyu Ni
Current CPU state definition include CpuStateIdle and CpuStateFinished.
After investigation, current code can use CpuStateIdle to replace the
CpuStateFinished. It will reduce the state number and easy for maintenance.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 18 ++++++++----------
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index c82b985943..ff09a0e9e7 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
}
}
}
- SetApState (&CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber], CpuStateFinished);
+ SetApState (&CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber], CpuStateIdle);
}
}
@@ -1352,18 +1352,17 @@ CheckThisAP (
CpuData = &CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber];
//
- // Check the CPU state of AP. If it is CpuStateFinished, then the AP has finished its task.
+ // Check the CPU state of AP. If it is CpuStateIdle, then the AP has finished its task.
// Only BSP and corresponding AP access this unit of CPU Data. This means the AP will not modify the
- // value of state after setting the it to CpuStateFinished, so BSP can safely make use of its value.
+ // value of state after setting the it to CpuStateIdle, so BSP can safely make use of its value.
//
//
// If the AP finishes for StartupThisAP(), return EFI_SUCCESS.
//
- if (GetApState(CpuData) == CpuStateFinished) {
+ if (GetApState(CpuData) == CpuStateIdle) {
if (CpuData->Finished != NULL) {
*(CpuData->Finished) = TRUE;
}
- SetApState (CpuData, CpuStateIdle);
return EFI_SUCCESS;
} else {
//
@@ -1420,14 +1419,13 @@ CheckAllAPs (
CpuData = &CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber];
//
- // Check the CPU state of AP. If it is CpuStateFinished, then the AP has finished its task.
+ // Check the CPU state of AP. If it is CpuStateIdle, then the AP has finished its task.
// Only BSP and corresponding AP access this unit of CPU Data. This means the AP will not modify the
- // value of state after setting the it to CpuStateFinished, so BSP can safely make use of its value.
+ // value of state after setting the it to CpuStateIdle, so BSP can safely make use of its value.
//
- if (GetApState(CpuData) == CpuStateFinished) {
+ if (GetApState(CpuData) == CpuStateIdle) {
CpuMpData->RunningCount ++;
CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].Waiting = FALSE;
- SetApState(CpuData, CpuStateIdle);
//
// If in Single Thread mode, then search for the next waiting AP for execution.
@@ -1923,7 +1921,7 @@ SwitchBSPWorker (
//
// Wait for old BSP finished AP task
//
- while (GetApState (&CpuMpData->CpuData[CallerNumber]) != CpuStateFinished) {
+ while (GetApState (&CpuMpData->CpuData[CallerNumber]) != CpuStateIdle) {
CpuPause ();
}
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
index 9d0b866d09..962bce685d 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ typedef enum {
CpuStateIdle,
CpuStateReady,
CpuStateBusy,
- CpuStateFinished,
CpuStateDisabled
} CPU_STATE;
--
2.15.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Patch 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove StartCount and volatile definition.
2018-07-25 3:57 [Patch V2 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs Eric Dong
2018-07-25 3:57 ` [Patch 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant CpuStateFinished State Eric Dong
@ 2018-07-25 3:57 ` Eric Dong
2018-07-25 3:57 ` [Patch 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Not use disabled AP when call StartAllAPs Eric Dong
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dong @ 2018-07-25 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: edk2-devel; +Cc: Laszlo Ersek, Ruiyu Ni
The StartCount is duplicated with RunningCount, replace it with
RunningCount. Also the volatile for RunningCount is not needed.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 11 +++++------
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index ff09a0e9e7..0e57cc86bf 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ CheckAllAPs (
// value of state after setting the it to CpuStateIdle, so BSP can safely make use of its value.
//
if (GetApState(CpuData) == CpuStateIdle) {
- CpuMpData->RunningCount ++;
+ CpuMpData->RunningCount --;
CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].Waiting = FALSE;
//
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ CheckAllAPs (
//
// If all APs finish, return EFI_SUCCESS.
//
- if (CpuMpData->RunningCount == CpuMpData->StartCount) {
+ if (CpuMpData->RunningCount == 0) {
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ CheckAllAPs (
//
if (CpuMpData->FailedCpuList != NULL) {
*CpuMpData->FailedCpuList =
- AllocatePool ((CpuMpData->StartCount - CpuMpData->FinishedCount + 1) * sizeof (UINTN));
+ AllocatePool ((CpuMpData->RunningCount + 1) * sizeof (UINTN));
ASSERT (*CpuMpData->FailedCpuList != NULL);
}
ListIndex = 0;
@@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ StartupAllAPsWorker (
return EFI_NOT_STARTED;
}
- CpuMpData->StartCount = 0;
+ CpuMpData->RunningCount = 0;
for (ProcessorNumber = 0; ProcessorNumber < ProcessorCount; ProcessorNumber++) {
CpuData = &CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber];
CpuData->Waiting = FALSE;
@@ -2222,7 +2222,7 @@ StartupAllAPsWorker (
// Mark this processor as responsible for current calling.
//
CpuData->Waiting = TRUE;
- CpuMpData->StartCount++;
+ CpuMpData->RunningCount++;
}
}
}
@@ -2231,7 +2231,6 @@ StartupAllAPsWorker (
CpuMpData->ProcArguments = ProcedureArgument;
CpuMpData->SingleThread = SingleThread;
CpuMpData->FinishedCount = 0;
- CpuMpData->RunningCount = 0;
CpuMpData->FailedCpuList = FailedCpuList;
CpuMpData->ExpectedTime = CalculateTimeout (
TimeoutInMicroseconds,
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
index 962bce685d..5002b7e9c0 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
@@ -211,9 +211,8 @@ struct _CPU_MP_DATA {
UINTN BackupBuffer;
UINTN BackupBufferSize;
- volatile UINT32 StartCount;
volatile UINT32 FinishedCount;
- volatile UINT32 RunningCount;
+ UINT32 RunningCount;
BOOLEAN SingleThread;
EFI_AP_PROCEDURE Procedure;
VOID *ProcArguments;
--
2.15.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread