From: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v3 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove StartCount and volatile definition.
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:50:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725075020.240-3-eric.dong@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180725075020.240-1-eric.dong@intel.com>
The StartCount is duplicated with RunningCount, replace it with
RunningCount. Also the volatile for RunningCount is not needed.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 11 +++++------
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index ff09a0e9e7..0e57cc86bf 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ CheckAllAPs (
// value of state after setting the it to CpuStateIdle, so BSP can safely make use of its value.
//
if (GetApState(CpuData) == CpuStateIdle) {
- CpuMpData->RunningCount ++;
+ CpuMpData->RunningCount --;
CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].Waiting = FALSE;
//
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ CheckAllAPs (
//
// If all APs finish, return EFI_SUCCESS.
//
- if (CpuMpData->RunningCount == CpuMpData->StartCount) {
+ if (CpuMpData->RunningCount == 0) {
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ CheckAllAPs (
//
if (CpuMpData->FailedCpuList != NULL) {
*CpuMpData->FailedCpuList =
- AllocatePool ((CpuMpData->StartCount - CpuMpData->FinishedCount + 1) * sizeof (UINTN));
+ AllocatePool ((CpuMpData->RunningCount + 1) * sizeof (UINTN));
ASSERT (*CpuMpData->FailedCpuList != NULL);
}
ListIndex = 0;
@@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ StartupAllAPsWorker (
return EFI_NOT_STARTED;
}
- CpuMpData->StartCount = 0;
+ CpuMpData->RunningCount = 0;
for (ProcessorNumber = 0; ProcessorNumber < ProcessorCount; ProcessorNumber++) {
CpuData = &CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber];
CpuData->Waiting = FALSE;
@@ -2222,7 +2222,7 @@ StartupAllAPsWorker (
// Mark this processor as responsible for current calling.
//
CpuData->Waiting = TRUE;
- CpuMpData->StartCount++;
+ CpuMpData->RunningCount++;
}
}
}
@@ -2231,7 +2231,6 @@ StartupAllAPsWorker (
CpuMpData->ProcArguments = ProcedureArgument;
CpuMpData->SingleThread = SingleThread;
CpuMpData->FinishedCount = 0;
- CpuMpData->RunningCount = 0;
CpuMpData->FailedCpuList = FailedCpuList;
CpuMpData->ExpectedTime = CalculateTimeout (
TimeoutInMicroseconds,
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
index 962bce685d..5002b7e9c0 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
@@ -211,9 +211,8 @@ struct _CPU_MP_DATA {
UINTN BackupBuffer;
UINTN BackupBufferSize;
- volatile UINT32 StartCount;
volatile UINT32 FinishedCount;
- volatile UINT32 RunningCount;
+ UINT32 RunningCount;
BOOLEAN SingleThread;
EFI_AP_PROCEDURE Procedure;
VOID *ProcArguments;
--
2.15.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-25 7:50 [Patch V3 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs Eric Dong
2018-07-25 7:50 ` [Patch v3 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant CpuStateFinished State Eric Dong
2018-07-25 10:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 11:15 ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-26 5:18 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-25 7:50 ` Eric Dong [this message]
2018-07-25 11:47 ` [Patch v3 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove StartCount and volatile definition Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 12:09 ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-25 15:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26 5:22 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-25 7:50 ` [Patch v3 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Not use disabled AP when call StartAllAPs Eric Dong
2018-07-25 12:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 12:44 ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-26 8:36 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-26 8:36 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-25 12:12 ` [Patch V3 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 15:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725075020.240-3-eric.dong@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox