From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c09::242; helo=mail-wm0-x242.google.com; envelope-from=graeme.gregory@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com (mail-wm0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28205210D515D for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id l2-v6so2617172wme.1 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 08:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gRXESCLzbAxzhydtYp2QGcyrhlkJIFr1SbG2mHCa4Zc=; b=cNxmnGO0ulHfKLxRpHiv3QKgkz+qnkxrNxgYcDrYMLeSEDcWqwQL2PS4Hbwz6Qli2U G9TbIFWPBNhycKbgLyyybdJmsvf4p6Y3ULIIvkD/axKWNmY5i3FAr5LWT4olVxD0N4ph yzk4x9NW400BH2fNqx5AGr6SvKTQDCYVqVzcI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gRXESCLzbAxzhydtYp2QGcyrhlkJIFr1SbG2mHCa4Zc=; b=oA822fVFE3eQXb67DlyKdb4GN7HxQ3aJwiDKg4qtPkg8WuEusgREKvgSErwlUqvHXV Q33AnQ8hdeYvc04gwQZlVW5liBaPAIr2VWJCjHHCyt+/7aB9FHn9T/gLtofsw38IZXE4 JEaLn3gTIBM4eofb0uUQ8Q7WoSa4CRu6EcpX+arJi+7Lk8h+Eo/yWtJ+VxstwRev1OLO Av9qY+WHzzBtLQMWbexjAJrEZ4eyyJPAxz/yxRFnn191kAToWUmgpquIBxuOxGja/kKq ZBrm7s3kz2D1p3HPcXIOrun5YTOHcxtUSaZswqwcL07oty+TJla04pe5CVzKrOgyYFgn A6Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEIVZ7XbPmbxuZA7Bi4dhWLGg+/IQXIUunS/sLByxRu7X6I1b9W G5CamBiZDFIZ9rnfLyrE5hckXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeNMhcrZIDHexxJpwpUI5hvL9CRHTAhsO2N4XeurEo1Iw6iRUmJ2DsapgmGrg0wwCtUjklkIg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e043:: with SMTP id x64-v6mr2449980wmg.58.1533224194108; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 08:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-89-241-187-212.as13285.net. [89.241.187.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b202-v6sm3197733wme.22.2018.08.02.08.36.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Aug 2018 08:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 16:36:31 +0100 From: Graeme Gregory To: Leif Lindholm Cc: Ming , linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org, edk2-devel@lists.01.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, guoheyi@huawei.com, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com, huangming23@huawei.com, zhangjinsong2@huawei.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com, john.garry@huawei.com, xinliang.liu@linaro.org Message-ID: <20180802153631.GB2372@xora-sinquacker> References: <20180724070922.63362-1-ming.huang@linaro.org> <20180801215640.5o364hnk2qd4diwn@bivouac.eciton.net> <20180802101256.u4v6r7ubvsgtp7sl@bivouac.eciton.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180802101256.u4v6r7ubvsgtp7sl@bivouac.eciton.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v1 00/38] Upload for D06 platform X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:36:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:12:56AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 09:46:13AM +0800, Ming wrote: > > I am sorry for the first issue, the modify FIRMWARE_VER patch is add > > alone just befor send out the patchset. > > > > For generating acpi table, I use acpica-tools 20180508 version and it works. > > I think acpica-tools are not backward compatibility and confused about acpica-tools. > > Yes, it's a real pain. We used to have lots of issues with this, but > the last couple of years have been less bad. > Some platforms moved from .asl to .aslc to get around this. > > I can confirm using 20180508 version resolves this issue. > And that 20180629 does not work :( > Unfortunately that won't currently work with our AMD overdrive > platforms. But we'll have to live with that for now. > This sounds like a bug in IORT support in acpica tools as it works for other tables. Graeme