public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] MdeModulePkg/SmmLockBox: [CVE-2017-5753] Fix bounds check bypass
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:41:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920064103.14600-4-hao.a.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920064103.14600-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>

REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194

Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.

If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.

This commit will focus on the SMI handler(s) registered within the
SmmLockBox driver and insert LoadFence API to mitigate the
bounds check bypass issue.

For SMI handler SmmLockBoxHandler():

Under "case EFI_SMM_LOCK_BOX_COMMAND_SAVE:", the 'CommBuffer' (controlled
external inputs) is passed to function SmmLockBoxSave().

'TempLockBoxParameterSave.Length' can be a potential cross boundary access
of the 'CommBuffer' during speculative execution. This cross boundary
access is later passed as parameter 'Length' into function SaveLockBox().

Within function SaveLockBox(), the value of 'Length' can be inferred by
code:
"CopyMem ((VOID *)(UINTN)SmramBuffer, (VOID *)(UINTN)Buffer, Length);".
One can observe which part of the content within 'Buffer' was brought into
cache to possibly reveal the value of 'Length'.

Hence, this commit adds a LoadFence after the boundary/range checks of
'CommBuffer' to prevent the speculative execution.

And there is a similar case under "case EFI_SMM_LOCK_BOX_COMMAND_UPDATE:"
function SmmLockBoxUpdate() as well. This commits also handles it.

A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation

And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf

Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/LockBox/SmmLockBox/SmmLockBox.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/LockBox/SmmLockBox/SmmLockBox.c b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/LockBox/SmmLockBox/SmmLockBox.c
index 5a11743cb9..87b4947908 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/LockBox/SmmLockBox/SmmLockBox.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/LockBox/SmmLockBox/SmmLockBox.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ SmmLockBoxSave (
     LockBoxParameterSave->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)EFI_ACCESS_DENIED;
     return ;
   }
+  LoadFence ();
 
   //
   // Save data
@@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ SmmLockBoxUpdate (
     LockBoxParameterUpdate->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)EFI_ACCESS_DENIED;
     return ;
   }
+  LoadFence ();
 
   //
   // Update data
-- 
2.12.0.windows.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-20  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-20  6:40 [PATCH v1 0/5] [CVE-2017-5753] Bounds Check Bypass issue in SMI handlers Hao Wu
2018-09-20  6:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] MdePkg/BaseLib: Add new LoadFence API Hao Wu
2018-09-20 13:13   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-21  2:14     ` Wu, Hao A
2018-09-21  2:21       ` Yao, Jiewen
2018-09-21  2:38     ` Wu, Hao A
2018-09-20  6:41 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] MdeModulePkg/FaultTolerantWrite:[CVE-2017-5753]Fix bounds check bypass Hao Wu
2018-09-20  6:41 ` Hao Wu [this message]
2018-09-20  6:41 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] MdeModulePkg/Variable: [CVE-2017-5753] Fix " Hao Wu
2018-09-20  6:41 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: " Hao Wu
2018-09-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] [CVE-2017-5753] Bounds Check Bypass issue in SMI handlers Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-20 13:59 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-09-21  2:14   ` Wu, Hao A

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180920064103.14600-4-hao.a.wu@intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox