public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	Liangcheng Tang <liangcheng.tang@intel.com>,
	Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Refine data buffer & len check in PassThru
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:41:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018064200.2068-2-hao.a.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181018064200.2068-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>

REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1142

According to the the NVM Express spec Revision 1.1, for some commands
(like Get/Set Feature Command, Figure 89 & 90 of the spec), the Memory
Buffer maybe optional although the command opcode indicates there is a
data transfer between host & controller (Get/Set Feature Command, Figure
38 of the spec).

Hence, this commit refine the checks for the 'TransferLength' and
'TransferBuffer' field of the EFI_NVM_EXPRESS_PASS_THRU_COMMAND_PACKET
structure to address this issue.

Cc: Liangcheng Tang <liangcheng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c | 33 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
index 2468871322..bfcd349794 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
@@ -595,7 +595,8 @@ NvmExpressPassThru (
   //
   if (((Sq->Opc & (BIT0 | BIT1)) != 0) &&
       !((Packet->QueueType == NVME_ADMIN_QUEUE) && ((Sq->Opc == NVME_ADMIN_CRIOCQ_CMD) || (Sq->Opc == NVME_ADMIN_CRIOSQ_CMD)))) {
-    if ((Packet->TransferLength == 0) || (Packet->TransferBuffer == NULL)) {
+    if (((Packet->TransferLength != 0) && (Packet->TransferBuffer == NULL)) ||
+        ((Packet->TransferLength == 0) && (Packet->TransferBuffer != NULL))) {
       return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
     }
 
@@ -605,21 +606,23 @@ NvmExpressPassThru (
       Flag = EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterWrite;
     }
 
-    MapLength = Packet->TransferLength;
-    Status = PciIo->Map (
-                      PciIo,
-                      Flag,
-                      Packet->TransferBuffer,
-                      &MapLength,
-                      &PhyAddr,
-                      &MapData
-                      );
-    if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || (Packet->TransferLength != MapLength)) {
-      return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
-    }
+    if ((Packet->TransferLength != 0) && (Packet->TransferBuffer != NULL)) {
+      MapLength = Packet->TransferLength;
+      Status = PciIo->Map (
+                        PciIo,
+                        Flag,
+                        Packet->TransferBuffer,
+                        &MapLength,
+                        &PhyAddr,
+                        &MapData
+                        );
+      if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || (Packet->TransferLength != MapLength)) {
+        return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
+      }
 
-    Sq->Prp[0] = PhyAddr;
-    Sq->Prp[1] = 0;
+      Sq->Prp[0] = PhyAddr;
+      Sq->Prp[1] = 0;
+    }
 
     if((Packet->MetadataLength != 0) && (Packet->MetadataBuffer != NULL)) {
       MapLength = Packet->MetadataLength;
-- 
2.12.0.windows.1



  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-18  6:41 [PATCH v1 0/3] NvmExpressDxe: Bug fixes within NvmExpressPassThru() Hao Wu
2018-10-18  6:41 ` Hao Wu [this message]
2018-10-23  8:53   ` [PATCH v1 1/3] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Refine data buffer & len check in PassThru Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-18  6:41 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Always copy CQ entry to PassThru packet Hao Wu
2018-10-23  8:54   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-18  6:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Refine PassThru IO queue creation behavior Hao Wu
2018-10-23  8:53   ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-24  0:59     ` Wu, Hao A

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181018064200.2068-2-hao.a.wu@intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox