public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Core: fill logic hole in MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:07:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181106120732.kry6j534ovmo7xlj@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181103064221.4764-2-jian.j.wang@intel.com>

On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 02:42:20PM +0800, Jian J Wang wrote:
> At the end of of MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify there's cleanup
> code to free resource. But at line 978, 994, 1005 the function returns
> directly. This patch use "goto" to replace "return" to make sure the
> resource is freed before exit.
> 
> 1029:  CoreCloseEvent (Event);
> 1030:  return;
> 
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c | 42 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> index 6298b67db1..30e5c5153c 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify (
>    DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify:\n"));
>    Status = CoreLocateProtocol (&gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid, NULL, (VOID **)&gCpu);
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> -    return;
> +    goto Done;
>    }
>  
>    //
> @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify (
>    HeapGuardCpuArchProtocolNotify ();
>  
>    if (mImageProtectionPolicy == 0) {
> -    return;
> +    goto Done;
>    }
>  
>    Status = gBS->LocateHandleBuffer (
> @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify (
>                    &HandleBuffer
>                    );
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status) && (NoHandles == 0)) {
> -    return ;
> +    goto Done;
>    }
>  
>    for (Index = 0; Index < NoHandles; Index++) {
> @@ -1026,8 +1026,8 @@ MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify (
>      ProtectUefiImage (LoadedImage, LoadedImageDevicePath);
>    }
>  
> +Done:
>    CoreCloseEvent (Event);
> -  return;
>  }
>  
>  /**

I have no comments on the bits above, but everything below here looks
like it's only ruining the indentation without any functional changes
at all.

/
    Leif

> @@ -1136,24 +1136,24 @@ CoreInitializeMemoryProtection (
>            GetPermissionAttributeForMemoryType (EfiConventionalMemory));
>  
>    if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0 || PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) != 0) {
> -    Status = CoreCreateEvent (
> -               EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
> -               TPL_CALLBACK,
> -               MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
> -               NULL,
> -               &Event
> -               );
> -    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
> +  Status = CoreCreateEvent (
> +             EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
> +             TPL_CALLBACK,
> +             MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
> +             NULL,
> +             &Event
> +             );
> +  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
>  
> -    //
> -    // Register for protocol notifactions on this event
> -    //
> -    Status = CoreRegisterProtocolNotify (
> -               &gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid,
> -               Event,
> -               &Registration
> -               );
> -    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
> +  //
> +  // Register for protocol notifactions on this event
> +  //
> +  Status = CoreRegisterProtocolNotify (
> +             &gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid,
> +             Event,
> +             &Registration
> +             );
> +  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
>    }
>  
>    //
> -- 
> 2.16.2.windows.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-06 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-03  6:42 [PATCH 0/2] fix ineffective guard page issue Jian J Wang
2018-11-03  6:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Core: fill logic hole in MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify Jian J Wang
2018-11-06 12:07   ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2018-11-03  6:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Core: fix ineffective guard page issue Jian J Wang
2018-11-06 12:09   ` Leif Lindholm
2018-11-07  0:38     ` Wang, Jian J

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181106120732.kry6j534ovmo7xlj@bivouac.eciton.net \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox