public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>, Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Core: fix ineffective guard page issue
Date: Wed,  7 Nov 2018 15:12:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107071248.6340-3-jian.j.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107071248.6340-1-jian.j.wang@intel.com>

>v3: no change

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295

This issue originates from following patch which allows to enable
paging if PcdImageProtectionPolicy and PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
(in addition to PcdSetNxForStack) are set to enable related features.

  5267926134d17e86672b84fd57b438f05ffa68e1

Due to above change, PcdImageProtectionPolicy will be set to 0 by
default in many platforms, which, in turn, cause following code in
MdeModulePkg\Core\Dxe\Misc\MemoryProtection.c fail the creation of
notify event of CpuArchProtocol.

1138:  if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0 ||
           PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) != 0) {
1139:  Status = CoreCreateEvent (
...
1142:             MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
...
1145:             );

Then following call flow won't be done and Guard pages will not be
set as not-present in SetAllGuardPages() eventually.

   MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> HeapGuardCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> SetAllGuardPages()

The solution is removing the if(...) statement so that the notify
event will always be created and registered. This won't cause
unnecessary code execution because, in the notify event handler,
the related PCDs like

    PcdImageProtectionPolicy and
    PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy

will be checked again before doing related jobs.

Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c | 36 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
index 8a93c5362a..c43e0d08ae 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
@@ -1136,26 +1136,24 @@ CoreInitializeMemoryProtection (
   ASSERT (GetPermissionAttributeForMemoryType (EfiBootServicesData) ==
           GetPermissionAttributeForMemoryType (EfiConventionalMemory));
 
-  if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0 || PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) != 0) {
-    Status = CoreCreateEvent (
-               EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
-               TPL_CALLBACK,
-               MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
-               NULL,
-               &Event
-               );
-    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
+  Status = CoreCreateEvent (
+             EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
+             TPL_CALLBACK,
+             MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
+             NULL,
+             &Event
+             );
+  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
 
-    //
-    // Register for protocol notifactions on this event
-    //
-    Status = CoreRegisterProtocolNotify (
-               &gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid,
-               Event,
-               &Registration
-               );
-    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
-  }
+  //
+  // Register for protocol notifactions on this event
+  //
+  Status = CoreRegisterProtocolNotify (
+             &gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid,
+             Event,
+             &Registration
+             );
+  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
 
   //
   // Register a callback to disable NULL pointer detection at EndOfDxe
-- 
2.16.2.windows.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-07  7:12 [PATCH v3 0/2] fix ineffective guard page issue Jian J Wang
2018-11-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Core: fill logic hole in MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify Jian J Wang
2018-11-07  7:52   ` Leif Lindholm
2018-11-07  8:33     ` Wang, Jian J
2018-11-07  7:12 ` Jian J Wang [this message]
2018-11-07  7:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] fix ineffective guard page issue Zeng, Star

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181107071248.6340-3-jian.j.wang@intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox