From: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [edk2-test][v3 Patch 3/3] uefi-sct/SctPkg:Add VerifySignature() Conf Test
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 13:51:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205055151.97848-1-eric.jin@intel.com> (raw)
Enable the BBTestVerifySignatureConformanceTest()
with checkpoints under 7 cases below, it should
not be success.
a)Signature is NULL/SignatureSize is 0/InHash is NULL
/InHashSize is 0/AllowedDb is NULL
b)Modify the Data in P7TestSignature to make it invalid
c)Modify the Data in InHash to make it invalid
d)Input the invalid Hashsize
e)The SignedData buffer was correctly formatted but
signer was in RevokedDb
f)The SignedData buffer was correctly formatted but
signer was not in AllowedDb
g)Matching content hash found in the RevokedDb
Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
---
.../EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c | 5 +-
.../EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h | 16 ++
.../BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestConformance.c | 301 +++++++++++++++++++++
.../PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.c | 9 +
.../PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.h | 8 +
5 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c
index 4d433c3..8f6546a 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c
@@ -36,7 +36,10 @@ EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid007 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMAN
EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid008 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_008_GUID;
EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid009 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_009_GUID;
EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid010 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_010_GUID;
-
+EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_011_GUID;
+EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid012 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_012_GUID;
+EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid013 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_013_GUID;
+EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid014 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_014_GUID;
EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestFunctionAssertionGuid001 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTFUNCTION_ASSERTION_001_GUID;
EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestFunctionAssertionGuid002 = EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTFUNCTION_ASSERTION_002_GUID;
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h
index 94d2568..1827207 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h
@@ -65,6 +65,22 @@ extern EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid009;
{ 0xb136e016, 0x4f80, 0x44bd, {0xba, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x34, 0x8a, 0x2d, 0xa1, 0x8a }}
extern EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid010;
+#define EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_011_GUID \
+{ 0xa58f3626, 0xf16e, 0x4cd5, { 0xba, 0x12, 0x7a, 0x9d, 0xd6, 0x9a, 0x7a, 0x71 }}
+extern EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_012_GUID \
+{ 0xbe4a0bf2, 0x2d46, 0x4d96, { 0xa6, 0x11, 0x21, 0x99, 0xa5, 0x5f, 0xa4, 0xee }}
+extern EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid012;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_013_GUID \
+{ 0xc0536a27, 0x304e, 0x497a, { 0xa5, 0xe3, 0x94, 0x11, 0x38, 0x53, 0x6e, 0x40 }}
+extern EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid013;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTCONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_014_GUID \
+{ 0x8c5aa0e8, 0x17ff, 0x49cd, { 0x8f, 0xec, 0x37, 0xc3, 0xfd, 0x5f, 0x77, 0x0 }}
+extern EFI_GUID gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid014;
+
#define EFI_TEST_PKCS7BBTESTFUNCTION_ASSERTION_001_GUID \
{ 0x5c0eec50, 0xa6ea, 0x413c, {0x8a, 0x46, 0x4a, 0xd1, 0x4a, 0x77, 0x76, 0xf1 }}
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestConformance.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestConformance.c
index 1dc9921..ce7d5bb 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestConformance.c
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestConformance.c
@@ -502,3 +502,304 @@ BBTestVerifyBufferConformanceTest (
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
+
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestVerifySignatureConformanceTest (
+ IN EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL *This,
+ IN VOID *ClientInterface,
+ IN EFI_TEST_LEVEL TestLevel,
+ IN EFI_HANDLE SupportHandle
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ EFI_PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL *Pkcs7Verify;
+ EFI_TEST_ASSERTION AssertionType;
+
+ Pkcs7Verify = (EFI_PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL*)ClientInterface;
+ if (Pkcs7Verify == NULL)
+ return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
+
+ //
+ // Get the Standard Library Interface
+ //
+ Status = gtBS->HandleProtocol (
+ SupportHandle,
+ &gEfiStandardTestLibraryGuid,
+ (VOID **) &StandardLib
+ );
+ if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
+ return Status;
+ }
+
+ AllowedDb[0] = DbEntry1;
+
+ //
+ // Checkpoint 1 - EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER
+ //
+
+ // Signature is NULL
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, NULL, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, NULL, NULL);
+ if (Status == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when Signature is NULL.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // SignatureSize is 0
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, 0, TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, NULL, NULL);
+ if (Status == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when SignatureSize is 0.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // InHash is NULL.
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), NULL, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, NULL, NULL);
+ if (Status == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when InHash is NULL.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // InHashSize is 0.
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, 0, AllowedDb, NULL, NULL);
+ if (Status == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when InHashSize is 0.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // AllowedDb is NULL
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ if (Status == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid011,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when AllowedDb is NULL.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ //
+ // Checkpoint 2 - EFI_UNSUPPORTED
+ // NOTE: It's hard to distinguish unsupported Signature or security-violated signature for VerifySignature() interface
+ // since we don't need to extra the attached content from input signature as VerifyBuffer() interface.
+ // So it's OK to bypass this check or just check the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION result.
+ //
+
+ //
+ // Modify the Data in the P7TestSignature to make it the invalid one
+ //
+ P7TestSignature[0] = 0x40;
+
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, NULL, NULL);
+
+ if ((Status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED) || (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION))
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid012,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED when Signature buffer was not clrrectly formatted.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ //
+ // Restore the P7TestSignature to the valid one
+ //
+ P7TestSignature[0] = 0x30;
+
+ //
+ // Checkpoint 4 - EFI_COMPROMISED_DATA
+ // NOTE: P7Verify leverage OpenSSL for pkcs7 signature verification
+ // It's hard for EFI_COMPROMISED_DATA check. Just use EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION for wrong InHash input.
+ //
+
+ //
+ // Modify the Data in the InHash to make it the invalid one
+ //
+ TestInHash[0] = 0x3E;
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, RevokedDb, TimestampDb);
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid013,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION when hash differs from signed hash.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+ //
+ // Restore the InHash
+ //
+ TestInHash[0] = 0x3D;
+
+ //
+ // Input the invalid Hashsize
+ //
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash)- 2, AllowedDb, RevokedDb, TimestampDb);
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid013,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION when encrypted hash is different size.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ //
+ // Checkpoint 5 - EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
+ //
+
+ //
+ // The SignedData buffer was correctly formatted but signer was in RevokedDb
+ //
+ AllowedDb[0] = DbEntry1;
+ RevokedDb[0] = DbEntry1;
+
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, RevokedDb, TimestampDb);
+
+ AllowedDb[0] = NULL;
+ RevokedDb[0] = NULL;
+
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid014,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION when the SignedData buffer was correctly formatted but signer was in RevokedDb.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ //
+ // The SignedData buffer was correctly formatted but signer was not in AllowedDb
+ //
+ AllowedDb[0] = NULL;
+
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, RevokedDb, TimestampDb);
+
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid014,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION when the SignedData buffer was correctly formatted but signer was not in AllowedDb.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+ //
+ // Matching content hash found in the RevokedDb
+ //
+ SctCopyMem ((UINT8 *)DbEntry4 + sizeof (EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST) + sizeof(EFI_GUID), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash));
+ RevokedDb[0] = DbEntry4;
+ AllowedDb[0] = DbEntry1;
+ Status = Pkcs7Verify->VerifySignature (Pkcs7Verify, P7TestSignature, sizeof(P7TestSignature), TestInHash, sizeof(TestInHash), AllowedDb, RevokedDb, TimestampDb);
+
+ RevokedDb[0] = NULL;
+ AllowedDb[0] = NULL;
+
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ else
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gPkcs7BBTestConformanceAssertionGuid014,
+ L"PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL.VerifySignature - VerifySignature() should returns EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION when matching content hash found in the RevokedDb.",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r\n",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ //
+ // Clean the Data in all Dbs
+ //
+ AllowedDb[0] = NULL;
+ RevokedDb[0] = NULL;
+ TimestampDb[0] = NULL;
+
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.c
index c0d8e4e..a84cc69 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.c
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.c
@@ -88,6 +88,15 @@ EFI_BB_TEST_ENTRY_FIELD gBBTestEntryField[] = {
EFI_TEST_CASE_AUTO,
BBTestVerifyBufferConformanceTest
},
+ {
+ EFI_PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL_TEST_ENTRY_GUID0202,
+ L"VerifySignatureConformance",
+ L"Conformance auto test for Pkcs7 Verify Protocol VerifySignature().",
+ EFI_TEST_LEVEL_MINIMAL,
+ gSupportProtocolGuid,
+ EFI_TEST_CASE_AUTO,
+ BBTestVerifySignatureConformanceTest
+ },
0
};
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.h b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.h
index 8e99563..7c5027c 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.h
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/PKCS7Verify/BlackBoxTest/Pkcs7BBTestMain.h
@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ BBTestVerifyBufferConformanceTest (
);
EFI_STATUS
+BBTestVerifySignatureConformanceTest (
+ IN EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL *This,
+ IN VOID *ClientInterface,
+ IN EFI_TEST_LEVEL TestLevel,
+ IN EFI_HANDLE SupportHandle
+ );
+
+EFI_STATUS
BBTestVerifyBufferFunctionTest (
IN EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL *This,
IN VOID *ClientInterface,
--
2.9.0.windows.1
reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181205055151.97848-1-eric.jin@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox