From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::443; helo=mail-wr1-x443.google.com; envelope-from=leif.lindholm@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367DF2116DA08 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 03:56:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id b14so10149818wru.12 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 03:56:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=B5y1cdOqGbKHTOMRTx+BES6POndw42ihGCSLqWuHOZs=; b=hyydNR14HT9HslRjFLVQiaofFzVrBbcBT1atqyejUrmZFbubF/nLHr+ede7VCJvrk1 S7BAnzw5uXqq3/0p+vITDkOg8k2Tup2Nxv6lEk0oQTuWr/PjGdwBy7Zv6fcOZR2+u/Fi ZmqDlNmmPNzmw4CsTvZic8f8p34sa0qhQaGVQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=B5y1cdOqGbKHTOMRTx+BES6POndw42ihGCSLqWuHOZs=; b=eGS7xd7L/MkcEupZtr801Zq+hUdRYKB2JPQ9lu5Y4usrcXqQ9pxAfg4/32uhU+8POa 7dRezd4o+coBP4qqQmUm1asJ9ILpD0e6giKm07Y1ziVBIMTPbbqvh7E+k1NnxAHr1Ksf 26qYtGsKgqMsuIexXUU625lHbTveJ3Blk7SK9PL102nwrpjjKEbhbCktGuMm+UYgdNaP ehwJBrIBYwwxd3V7XoP89RQY1Ba6X8VskUm13IcK05OJDP7rrGmCd+XOLcLh4z3u2dnw 1isvyeE9WF6oPUnij2MWyH3LExUkYopBxwQpNjhrhXtdui19bD9Q6KQ6ZnzAj/ho33rB EwKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbQ/T1h4U1NlxCUWrPhUJz9HOBt3cBBj/Vq7zE9Oz2Y80PWMIUH fVBMg2OMes/x+B5kl8/nZ+MbTw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VWeyqLqcQm5iHQpfFBIbU574rwdjjOryZ8oL79tDFMvzmGUmVpmozuuht0iYWSyR7NZN9q7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dfd1:: with SMTP id q17mr10103474wrn.27.1544443012474; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 03:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bivouac.eciton.net (bivouac.eciton.net. [2a00:1098:0:86:1000:23:0:2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm14182124wrw.90.2018.12.10.03.56.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 03:56:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:56:50 +0000 From: Leif Lindholm To: "Gao, Liming" Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com)" , "afish@apple.com" , "Kinney, Michael D" , Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <20181210115650.rr566vwiynd4en5j@bivouac.eciton.net> References: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E384E67@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E384E67@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove unused tool chain configuration in BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:56:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:42:35PM +0000, Gao, Liming wrote: > Hi, all > tools_def.template includes all tool chains. Some are not used any > more. And, there is no verification for them. So, I propose to > remove them. They are VS2003, VS2005, VS2008, VS2010, DDK3790, > UNIXGCC, GCC44, GCC45, GCC46, GCC47, ELFGCC, CYGGCC, ICC, ICC11, > MYTOOLS. If you still use some one of them, please let me know. This sounds good to me. However, may I suggest splitting this up into several patches, such that if we need to revert one of the deletions, we would not need to reinstate all of them. I would propose: - One patch for VS20nn - One patch for GCCnn - One patch for UNIXGCC, ELFGCC, CYGGCC I can't really judge what a suitable mashup/split between DDK3790, ICC, ICC11, and MYTOOLS would be. On a sidenote, I think Rebecca said at least FreeBSD were using UNIXGCC(?) since the plain GCC toolchain profiles did not support cross compiling. I am pretty sure that is not accurate these days - did you look into that after the community call? Regards. Leif