From: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/12] MdeModulePkg/SmmLockBox(PEI): Remove an ASSERT in RestoreLockBox()
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:48:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131024854.4880-11-hao.a.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131024854.4880-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
This commit is out of the scope for BZ-1409. It is a refinement for the
PEI library instance within SmmLockBoxLib.
For the below ASSERT statement within function RestoreLockBox():
Status = SmmCommunicationPpi->Communicate (
SmmCommunicationPpi,
&CommBuffer[0],
&CommSize
);
if (Status == EFI_NOT_STARTED) {
//
// Pei SMM communication not ready yet, so we access SMRAM directly
//
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "SmmLockBoxPeiLib Communicate - (%r)\n", Status));
Status = InternalRestoreLockBoxFromSmram (Guid, Buffer, Length);
LockBoxParameterRestore->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)Status;
if (Length != NULL) {
LockBoxParameterRestore->Length = (UINT64)*Length;
}
}
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
It is possible for previous codes to return an error status that is
possible for happen. One example is that, when the 'if' statement
'if (Status == EFI_NOT_STARTED) {' is entered, function
InternalRestoreLockBoxFromSmram() is possible to return 'BUFFER_TOO_SMALL'
if the caller of RestoreLockBox() provides a buffer that is too small to
hold the content of LockBox.
Thus, this commit will remove the ASSERT here.
Please note that the current implementation of RestoreLockBox() is
handling the above-mentioned error case properly, so no additional error
handling codes are needed here.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
---
MdeModulePkg/Library/SmmLockBoxLib/SmmLockBoxPeiLib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/SmmLockBoxLib/SmmLockBoxPeiLib.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/SmmLockBoxLib/SmmLockBoxPeiLib.c
index 9f73480070..9d7b4c3706 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/SmmLockBoxLib/SmmLockBoxPeiLib.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/SmmLockBoxLib/SmmLockBoxPeiLib.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ RestoreLockBox (
LockBoxParameterRestore->Length = (UINT64)*Length;
}
}
- ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+ //ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
if (Length != NULL) {
*Length = (UINTN)LockBoxParameterRestore->Length;
--
2.12.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 2:48 [PATCH v2 00/12] Split the S3 PEI phase HW init codes from Opal driver Hao Wu
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] MdeModulePkg: Add definitions for ATA AHCI host controller PPI Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:25 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] MdeModulePkg: Add definitions for EDKII PEI ATA PassThru PPI Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:22 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 5:28 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] MdeModulePkg: Add definitions for Storage Security Command PPI Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:26 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] MdeModulePkg: Add GUID for LockBox to save storage dev to init in S3 Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:27 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 5:30 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressPei: Avoid updating the module-level variable Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:28 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressPei: Add logic to produce SSC PPI Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:35 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 5:40 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressPei: Consume S3StorageDeviceInitList LockBox Hao Wu
2019-01-31 3:45 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 5:45 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] MdeModulePkg/AhciPei: Add AHCI mode ATA device support in PEI Hao Wu
2019-01-31 5:49 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] MdeModulePkg/SmmLockBoxLib: Use 'DEBUG_' prefix instead of 'EFI_D_' Hao Wu
2019-01-31 5:49 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2019-01-31 2:48 ` Hao Wu [this message]
2019-01-31 5:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] MdeModulePkg/SmmLockBox(PEI): Remove an ASSERT in RestoreLockBox() Ni, Ruiyu
2019-01-31 5:53 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] MdeModulePkg/SmmLockBoxLib: Support LockBox enlarge in UpdateLockBox() Hao Wu
2019-01-31 6:00 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2019-01-31 2:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] SecurityPkg/OpalPassword: Remove HW init codes and consume SSC PPI Hao Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190131024854.4880-11-hao.a.wu@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox