From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: suse.com, ip: 195.135.221.5, mailfrom: glin@suse.com) Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com (smtp.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.5]) by groups.io with SMTP; Wed, 08 May 2019 20:21:05 -0700 Received: from emea4-mta.ukb.novell.com ([10.120.13.87]) by smtp.nue.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Thu, 09 May 2019 05:21:02 +0200 Received: from GaryWorkstation (nwb-a10-snat.microfocus.com [10.120.13.202]) by emea4-mta.ukb.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Thu, 09 May 2019 04:20:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 11:20:23 +0800 From: "Gary Lin" To: devel@edk2.groups.io, farrah.chen@intel.com Cc: "Hao, Xudong" , "Wei, Danmei" Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] OVMF will not start to build using "OvmfPkg/build.sh -a X64 -n 40" Message-ID: <20190509032023.GA28997@GaryWorkstation> References: <1B925CC0CD9F3341B32D442251E7E1DC3E2931EC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1B925CC0CD9F3341B32D442251E7E1DC3E2931EC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 02:31:13AM +0000, Chen, Farrah wrote: > Hi, > > We build the latest OVMF and found that it doesn't start to build using "OvmfPkg/build.sh -a X64 -n 40" actually. > > Step: > git clone https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git > cd edk2 > git submodule init > git submodule update -recursive > OvmfPkg/build.sh -a X64 -n 40 > Then it didn't start to build. > > log: > [vmm@vmm-build edk2]$ OvmfPkg/build.sh -a X64 -n 40 > Initializing workspace > /home/fan/edk2/BaseTools > Loading previous configuration from /home/fan/edk2/Conf/BuildEnv.sh > WORKSPACE: /home/fan/edk2 > EDK_TOOLS_PATH: /home/fan/edk2/BaseTools > CONF_PATH: /home/fan/edk2/Conf > [vmm@vmm-build edk2]$ > > We use the latest commit: 792f0d4f12ad5c01afdf9c92df8c479ff0f19a79, and we found the first commit has such issue is df7c81b5b219c9aee776baa466dd64c9d318dd80. > Do you have any advice? > TestUtilModule() returned the opposite value. For the shell, 0 for good, and 1 for bad. Gary Lin > > Thanks, > Fan > > > > >