Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] EmbeddedPkg: Fix DwEmmc CMD8 support for SD

["Leif Lindholm" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>]

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 05:30:23PM +0800, tien.hock.loh@intel.com wrote:
> From: "Tien Hock, Loh" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com>
> 
> On CMD8, for SD, the controller should not expect data as this is a
> SEND_IF_COND command to verify SD operating condition, and does not have
> data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tien Hock, Loh <tien.hock.loh@intel.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> 
> --
> v2
> - Change IsEmmc to EFI_MMC_HOST_CARD_TYPE

Version information goes below ---.
Never type this manually - sooner or later you will leave out a like
above and accidentally have it included in the commit message.

It is also helpful to include this information in a cover letter
[0/7]. For simple changes like this, there is no need to list it
individually in each patch.

> ---
>  EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h           | 6 ++++++
>  EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c        | 9 ++++++---
>  EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcIdentification.c | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h b/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h
> index 9e07082680..7807744721 100644
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Protocol/MmcHost.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ typedef BOOLEAN (EFIAPI *MMC_ISMULTIBLOCK) (
>    IN  EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL     *This
>    );
>  
> +typedef enum {
> +  EMMC,
> +  SD
> +} EFI_MMC_HOST_CARD_TYPE;
> +
>  struct _EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL {
>  
>    UINT32                  Revision;
> @@ -169,6 +174,7 @@ struct _EFI_MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL {
>    MMC_SETIOS              SetIos;
>    MMC_ISMULTIBLOCK        IsMultiBlock;
>  
> +  EFI_MMC_HOST_CARD_TYPE  HostCardType;
>  };
>  
>  #define MMC_HOST_PROTOCOL_REVISION    0x00010002    // 1.2
> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> index 420487757d..fd3a5bf685 100644
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> @@ -340,9 +340,12 @@ DwEmmcSendCommand (
>          Cmd = 0;
>      break;
>    case MMC_INDX(8):
> -    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
> -           BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED | BIT_CMD_READ |
> -           BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
> +    if (This->HostCardType == SD)
> +      Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
> +             BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
> +    else
> +      Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
> +             BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE | BIT_CMD_READ | BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED;

I saw no comment on my feedback from previous revision that
---
I think this would be more clear as
  Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
        BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
  if (...) {
    Cmd |= BIT_CMD_READ | BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED;
  }
---
and the request was not followed.

Also, always use { and } with if/else.

/
    Leif

>      break;
>    case MMC_INDX(9):
>      Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcIdentification.c b/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcIdentification.c
> index 4dc0be125c..c816ae09ee 100755
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcIdentification.c
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Universal/MmcDxe/MmcIdentification.c
> @@ -770,8 +770,10 @@ InitializeMmcDevice (
>    }
>  
>    if (MmcHostInstance->CardInfo.CardType != EMMC_CARD) {
> +    MmcHostInstance->MmcHost->HostCardType = SD;
>      Status = InitializeSdMmcDevice (MmcHostInstance);
>    } else {
> +    MmcHostInstance->MmcHost->HostCardType = EMMC;
>      Status = InitializeEmmcDevice (MmcHostInstance);
>    }
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> -- 
> 2.19.0
>