* [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid copy twice.
@ 2019-07-31 8:01 Dong, Eric
2019-07-31 15:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dong, Eric @ 2019-07-31 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel; +Cc: Ray Ni, Laszlo Ersek
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1982
MpInitLibInitialize in MpLib.c will be invoked on both PEI and DXE
CPU code, MicrocodeDetect would be performed twice and copy
Microcode from flash to memory twice as well, which consider as
duplicate work to lead longer boot time.
This patch just use microcode memory copied in PEI phase if exist.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 62 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index 572495ec36..a1ad665564 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -1607,38 +1607,42 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
CpuMpData->SwitchBspFlag = FALSE;
CpuMpData->CpuData = (CPU_AP_DATA *) (CpuMpData + 1);
CpuMpData->CpuInfoInHob = (UINT64) (UINTN) (CpuMpData->CpuData + MaxLogicalProcessorNumber);
- CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize);
- //
- // If platform has more than one CPU, relocate microcode to memory to reduce
- // loading microcode time.
- //
- MicrocodePatchInRam = NULL;
- if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
- MicrocodePatchInRam = AllocatePages (
- EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (
- (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
- )
- );
- }
- if (MicrocodePatchInRam == NULL) {
- //
- // there is only one processor, or no microcode patch is available, or
- // memory allocation failed
- //
- CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress);
- } else {
+ if (OldCpuMpData == NULL) {
+ CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize);
//
- // there are multiple processors, and a microcode patch is available, and
- // memory allocation succeeded
+ // If platform has more than one CPU, relocate microcode to memory to reduce
+ // loading microcode time.
//
- CopyMem (
- MicrocodePatchInRam,
- (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress),
- (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
- );
- CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = (UINTN)MicrocodePatchInRam;
+ MicrocodePatchInRam = NULL;
+ if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
+ MicrocodePatchInRam = AllocatePages (
+ EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (
+ (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
+ )
+ );
+ }
+ if (MicrocodePatchInRam == NULL) {
+ //
+ // there is only one processor, or no microcode patch is available, or
+ // memory allocation failed
+ //
+ CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress);
+ } else {
+ //
+ // there are multiple processors, and a microcode patch is available, and
+ // memory allocation succeeded
+ //
+ CopyMem (
+ MicrocodePatchInRam,
+ (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress),
+ (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
+ );
+ CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = (UINTN)MicrocodePatchInRam;
+ }
+ }else {
+ CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = OldCpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize;
+ CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = OldCpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress;
}
-
InitializeSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
//
--
2.21.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid copy twice.
2019-07-31 8:01 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid copy twice Dong, Eric
@ 2019-07-31 15:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-01 7:17 ` Ni, Ray
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2019-07-31 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dong, devel; +Cc: Ray Ni
On 07/31/19 10:01, Eric Dong wrote:
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1982
>
> MpInitLibInitialize in MpLib.c will be invoked on both PEI and DXE
> CPU code, MicrocodeDetect would be performed twice and copy
> Microcode from flash to memory twice as well, which consider as
> duplicate work to lead longer boot time.
> This patch just use microcode memory copied in PEI phase if exist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 62 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> index 572495ec36..a1ad665564 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> @@ -1607,38 +1607,42 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
> CpuMpData->SwitchBspFlag = FALSE;
> CpuMpData->CpuData = (CPU_AP_DATA *) (CpuMpData + 1);
> CpuMpData->CpuInfoInHob = (UINT64) (UINTN) (CpuMpData->CpuData + MaxLogicalProcessorNumber);
> - CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize);
> - //
> - // If platform has more than one CPU, relocate microcode to memory to reduce
> - // loading microcode time.
> - //
> - MicrocodePatchInRam = NULL;
> - if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
> - MicrocodePatchInRam = AllocatePages (
> - EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (
> - (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> - )
> - );
> - }
> - if (MicrocodePatchInRam == NULL) {
> - //
> - // there is only one processor, or no microcode patch is available, or
> - // memory allocation failed
> - //
> - CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress);
> - } else {
> + if (OldCpuMpData == NULL) {
> + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize);
> //
> - // there are multiple processors, and a microcode patch is available, and
> - // memory allocation succeeded
> + // If platform has more than one CPU, relocate microcode to memory to reduce
> + // loading microcode time.
> //
> - CopyMem (
> - MicrocodePatchInRam,
> - (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress),
> - (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> - );
> - CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = (UINTN)MicrocodePatchInRam;
> + MicrocodePatchInRam = NULL;
> + if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
> + MicrocodePatchInRam = AllocatePages (
> + EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (
> + (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> + )
> + );
> + }
> + if (MicrocodePatchInRam == NULL) {
> + //
> + // there is only one processor, or no microcode patch is available, or
> + // memory allocation failed
> + //
> + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress);
> + } else {
> + //
> + // there are multiple processors, and a microcode patch is available, and
> + // memory allocation succeeded
> + //
> + CopyMem (
> + MicrocodePatchInRam,
> + (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress),
> + (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> + );
> + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = (UINTN)MicrocodePatchInRam;
> + }
> + }else {
> + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = OldCpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize;
> + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = OldCpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress;
> }
> -
> InitializeSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
>
> //
>
I applied this patch locally and reviewed it with:
git show -b -W
The change looks reasonable to me.
(1) Please clarify the subject line a bit. My suggestion is:
UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: don't shadow the microcode patch twice
(this is 58 characters). Feel free to tweak this further if you wish;
the point is that "copy" is too generic in itself.
With (1) fixed:
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks
Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid copy twice.
2019-07-31 15:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
@ 2019-08-01 7:17 ` Ni, Ray
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ni, Ray @ 2019-08-01 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek, Dong, Eric, devel@edk2.groups.io
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 11:08 PM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid copy twice.
>
> On 07/31/19 10:01, Eric Dong wrote:
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1982
> >
> > MpInitLibInitialize in MpLib.c will be invoked on both PEI and DXE CPU
> > code, MicrocodeDetect would be performed twice and copy Microcode
> from
> > flash to memory twice as well, which consider as duplicate work to
> > lead longer boot time.
> > This patch just use microcode memory copied in PEI phase if exist.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 62
> > +++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > index 572495ec36..a1ad665564 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > @@ -1607,38 +1607,42 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
> > CpuMpData->SwitchBspFlag = FALSE;
> > CpuMpData->CpuData = (CPU_AP_DATA *) (CpuMpData + 1);
> > CpuMpData->CpuInfoInHob = (UINT64) (UINTN) (CpuMpData-
> >CpuData + MaxLogicalProcessorNumber);
> > - CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = PcdGet64
> > (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize);
> > - //
> > - // If platform has more than one CPU, relocate microcode to memory
> > to reduce
> > - // loading microcode time.
> > - //
> > - MicrocodePatchInRam = NULL;
> > - if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
> > - MicrocodePatchInRam = AllocatePages (
> > - EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (
> > - (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> > - )
> > - );
> > - }
> > - if (MicrocodePatchInRam == NULL) {
> > - //
> > - // there is only one processor, or no microcode patch is available, or
> > - // memory allocation failed
> > - //
> > - CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = PcdGet64
> (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress);
> > - } else {
> > + if (OldCpuMpData == NULL) {
> > + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = PcdGet64
> > + (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize);
> > //
> > - // there are multiple processors, and a microcode patch is available, and
> > - // memory allocation succeeded
> > + // If platform has more than one CPU, relocate microcode to memory to
> reduce
> > + // loading microcode time.
> > //
> > - CopyMem (
> > - MicrocodePatchInRam,
> > - (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress),
> > - (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> > - );
> > - CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = (UINTN)MicrocodePatchInRam;
> > + MicrocodePatchInRam = NULL;
> > + if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
> > + MicrocodePatchInRam = AllocatePages (
> > + EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (
> > + (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> > + )
> > + );
> > + }
> > + if (MicrocodePatchInRam == NULL) {
> > + //
> > + // there is only one processor, or no microcode patch is available, or
> > + // memory allocation failed
> > + //
> > + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = PcdGet64
> (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress);
> > + } else {
> > + //
> > + // there are multiple processors, and a microcode patch is available,
> and
> > + // memory allocation succeeded
> > + //
> > + CopyMem (
> > + MicrocodePatchInRam,
> > + (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress),
> > + (UINTN)CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> > + );
> > + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress =
> (UINTN)MicrocodePatchInRam;
> > + }
> > + }else {
> > + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize = OldCpuMpData-
> >MicrocodePatchRegionSize;
> > + CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress = OldCpuMpData-
> >MicrocodePatchAddress;
> > }
> > -
> > InitializeSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
> >
> > //
> >
>
> I applied this patch locally and reviewed it with:
>
> git show -b -W
>
> The change looks reasonable to me.
>
> (1) Please clarify the subject line a bit. My suggestion is:
>
> UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: don't shadow the microcode patch twice
>
> (this is 58 characters). Feel free to tweak this further if you wish; the point is
> that "copy" is too generic in itself.
>
>
> With (1) fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-01 7:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-31 8:01 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid copy twice Dong, Eric
2019-07-31 15:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-01 7:17 ` Ni, Ray
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox