From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: citrix.com, ip: 216.71.145.142, mailfrom: roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com [216.71.145.142]) by groups.io with SMTP; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:50:15 -0700 Authentication-Results: esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of roger.pau@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of roger.pau@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: S9/Sr9O7urngSVOxAm7LuOafi4j0OK44WgEKkRP5Q8eQfslqjcwmJKmZ8ppO4KuedHzUYnGRgq PifcepwHZbK85U3rxAotqk3U/mVBoOoQoykhBgKkQaWg1gxIoLEWv5uzKURikVN8nDXsbFgeY3 JuuB8dqzjbKLs28rlQg35lu/U4MbV4rbEe9KGQK6Jx1bK0zOXi0RErZUoX26M8UdXJSpG6xhG/ 3vydPez5yGlkwn/bTiyiaeu2X0Rq9CshAztw1agxjiM7J5WjFZMd1cyzL3gBP6NLgTLrQ59r/i m+I= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 4027207 X-Ironport-Server: esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,357,1559534400"; d="scan'208";a="4027207" Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 17:50:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= To: , CC: Julien Grall , , Jordan Justen , Ard Biesheuvel , Laszlo Ersek Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 28/35] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Handle the absence of PCI bus on Xen PVH Message-ID: <20190807155005.b5tyxlwjfoo6urko@Air-de-Roger> References: <20190729153944.24239-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <20190729153944.24239-29-anthony.perard@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190729153944.24239-29-anthony.perard@citrix.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Return-Path: roger.pau@citrix.com X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS02.citrite.net (10.69.22.113) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > When running in a Xen PVH guest, there's nothing to do in > PciAcpiInitialization() because there isn't any PCI bus. When the Host > Bridge DID isn't recognised, simply continue. (The value of > PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId would be 0 because it isn't set.) I guess we will need to figure out how to make OVMF happy when passthrough support is added to PVH. Having to fake a bridge is quite cumbersome, but I assume OVMF only pokes at some specific bridge registers which we might be able to emulate without much fuss. Thanks, Roger.