From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=DZcHOfMY; spf=pass (domain: linaro.org, ip: 209.85.128.66, mailfrom: leif.lindholm@linaro.org) Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com (mail-wm1-f66.google.com [209.85.128.66]) by groups.io with SMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:14:59 -0700 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 10so237883wmp.3 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:14:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=RRXr0YMBBQgy4FFO0VkQiNfOXqQCjn3S5Kov4NInpcU=; b=DZcHOfMYwwvDQHJ1hfUnU3gf5fMgtj2UlbLsVNTyHvfW3f12YWPL6jwt3+gzf974IW utVJpPELEixbM4fZJ1qwCg1jqWQWrQeMqCB9JoXcHT0meV1PJgaAR44+MPwtwaKVrcZ5 Xsi0msfRkFyKckk9/w/vmxX5znG1twrYSlNOG50uy/URbpPmrXSD8CHvK6c356i4EpD+ FuEt0CYppNhCQWTc0ukGfXRy2ovySkAOx6/IjnIhM1gEP/WalvO8bbL58xR5pcWOHlIY jDBIc5xr3Dfeu1uUmXIJUvJZeSDGNaNsZokuprrAym1aSh4XZNsLSQqWfV/Tw/+1JT7I CGPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RRXr0YMBBQgy4FFO0VkQiNfOXqQCjn3S5Kov4NInpcU=; b=Vnuu74TG+QxcOOuVcSDHkno5C7WUHMbdEWRLFCAVPiYJ7I36L6LmncHXDwx5H3aZc3 mpokLqvz/y18MUQ0S6Y4NNQ6sidBU6TPOXHYauExQquH+ffXkUP4W2A2M9vi5Fbd5hMN 281mRpPNSVjkcpZok9wyKo9WWZ2IfhEBZ60/01GAxBnYQFTO7qdTpsPgKvweYL/D7lcG TRu0BxSnGNB2Sn7TWomTD6IKAqkcq0qmKSw7CmPIlRXraEMAL5ePF8ffoD6YJEZ3xp4W 9RmQyxLvRjtT7szVlInfNu+tJLrFX+E0G60rmNU+b19DJRH+T9FLUjzKDRsisk6oU4Y/ dgmw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRbBOalNKyTrruANLaHbVgDD4iQ/sdXjcOX4SWbVaFP8OIIFOM L3XGBJRb1F61kU1FMpsNhML3/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwoG7w8EKXq9ZgmeEn8Sckob2IAxEA4CDrqIwpDC88M8ISRZrLQ6fCRdHk+80dXBS/lzs73DQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7e85:: with SMTP id z127mr22144435wmc.95.1566234897578; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from bivouac.eciton.net (bivouac.eciton.net. [2a00:1098:0:86:1000:23:0:2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm14271747wrx.60.2019.08.19.10.14.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:14:55 +0100 From: "Leif Lindholm" To: Marcin Wojtas Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io , Ard Biesheuvel , "jsd@semihalf.com" , Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Kostya Porotchkin , Andrew Fish , Laszlo Ersek , Michael D Kinney Subject: Re: [edk2-platforms: PATCH v2 03/10] Marvell/Cn9130Db: Add DeviceTree Message-ID: <20190819171455.GF29255@bivouac.eciton.net> References: <1565837654-13258-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <1565837654-13258-4-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <20190816171021.GV29255@bivouac.eciton.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +Stewards (don't panic!) On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:03:42PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Leif, > > pt., 16 sie 2019 o 19:10 Leif Lindholm napisał(a): > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:54:07AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > > > This patch adds device tree sources which are common for Cn913x SoCs > > > and the CN9130 development board (variant A). Wiring up of support > > > will be done in the follow-up commits. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas > > > > Again, I've not reviewed the contents extensively, *but* this patch > > cannot go into edk2-platforms - it has GPL licensed content. > > Was it meant for edk2-non-osi? Because we could take it there. > > Thanks for catching this - my oversight. The top-level DT files should > also be dual licenced (GPL2.0/MIT), same as recently submitted to > Linux. So IMO no need to go for edk2-non-osi. Right. MIT *is* an acceptable license, but no other licenses than BSD+Patent are blanket approved - it's a case by case basis. We still have a gap with regards to the explicit patent grant since the dropping of the TianoCore Contribution Agreement. While this is less problematic for something like .dts files, I don't think it can be argued that the problem does not exist for them. My preference for resolving this would be that anything merged into !edk2-non-osi (and, yes, we really ought to create an edk2-other-license or whatever) needs to use a license compatible with BSD+Patent (MIT is) and is registered as: SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent AND TL;DR: if you want to get the set merged quickly, edk2-non-osi is the best route for these files. Best Regards, Leif