* [patch v3 1/5] EmbeddedPkg: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:16 [patch v3 0/5] Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION Dandan Bi
@ 2019-09-24 13:16 ` Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: " Dandan Bi
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dandan Bi @ 2019-09-24 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel; +Cc: Leif Lindholm, Ard Biesheuvel, Laszlo Ersek,
Philippe Mathieu-Daude
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in EmbeddedPkg which don't have the policy to defer the
execution of the image.
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
---
.../AndroidFastboot/Arm/BootAndroidBootImg.c | 9 +++++++++
.../Library/AndroidBootImgLib/AndroidBootImgLib.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Application/AndroidFastboot/Arm/BootAndroidBootImg.c b/EmbeddedPkg/Application/AndroidFastboot/Arm/BootAndroidBootImg.c
index 591afbe7cc..fe05878b4b 100644
--- a/EmbeddedPkg/Application/AndroidFastboot/Arm/BootAndroidBootImg.c
+++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Application/AndroidFastboot/Arm/BootAndroidBootImg.c
@@ -71,10 +71,19 @@ StartEfiApplication (
// Load the image from the device path with Boot Services function
Status = gBS->LoadImage (TRUE, ParentImageHandle, DevicePath, NULL, 0,
&ImageHandle);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
return Status;
}
// Passed LoadOptions to the EFI Application
if (LoadOptionsSize != 0) {
diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/AndroidBootImgLib/AndroidBootImgLib.c b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/AndroidBootImgLib/AndroidBootImgLib.c
index d9e7aa7d2b..e1036954ee 100644
--- a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/AndroidBootImgLib/AndroidBootImgLib.c
+++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/AndroidBootImgLib/AndroidBootImgLib.c
@@ -439,10 +439,22 @@ AndroidBootImgBoot (
+ KernelSize;
Status = gBS->LoadImage (TRUE, gImageHandle,
(EFI_DEVICE_PATH *)&KernelDevicePath,
(VOID*)(UINTN)Kernel, KernelSize, &ImageHandle);
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
+ return Status;
+ }
// Set kernel arguments
Status = gBS->HandleProtocol (ImageHandle, &gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid,
(VOID **) &ImageInfo);
ImageInfo->LoadOptions = NewKernelArg;
--
2.18.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [patch v3 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:16 [patch v3 0/5] Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 1/5] EmbeddedPkg: " Dandan Bi
@ 2019-09-24 13:16 ` Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager: " Dandan Bi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dandan Bi @ 2019-09-24 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel
Cc: Jian J Wang, Hao A Wu, Liming Gao, Laszlo Ersek,
Philippe Mathieu-Daude
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
---
MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
index 95aa9de087..5dda561a04 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
@@ -1028,10 +1028,19 @@ StartFmpImage (
ImageSize,
&ImageHandle
);
DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: LoadImage - %r\n", Status));
if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
FreePool(DriverDevicePath);
return Status;
}
DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: StartImage ...\n"));
--
2.18.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:16 [patch v3 0/5] Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 1/5] EmbeddedPkg: " Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: " Dandan Bi
@ 2019-09-24 13:16 ` Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:21 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 4/5] MdeModulePkg/PlatformDriOverride: " Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 5/5] ShellPkg: " Dandan Bi
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dandan Bi @ 2019-09-24 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel
Cc: Jian J Wang, Hao A Wu, Ray Ni, Zhichao Gao, Liming Gao,
Laszlo Ersek, Philippe Mathieu-Daude
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in UefiBootManagerLib which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
---
V3: Enahnce the error handling logic in BmLoadOption.c and BmMisc.c.
MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c | 9 +++++++++
.../Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
index 952033fc82..760d7647b8 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
@@ -1859,10 +1859,19 @@ EfiBootManagerBoot (
if (FilePath != NULL) {
FreePool (FilePath);
}
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
//
// Report Status Code with the failure status to indicate that the failure to load boot option
//
BmReportLoadFailure (EFI_SW_DXE_BS_EC_BOOT_OPTION_LOAD_ERROR, Status);
BootOption->Status = Status;
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
index 07592f8ebd..89372b3b97 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
/** @file
Load option library functions which relate with creating and processing load options.
-Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
(C) Copyright 2015-2018 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
**/
@@ -1409,11 +1409,21 @@ EfiBootManagerProcessLoadOption (
FileSize,
&ImageHandle
);
FreePool (FileBuffer);
- if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
+ } else {
Status = gBS->HandleProtocol (ImageHandle, &gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid, (VOID **)&ImageInfo);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
ImageInfo->LoadOptionsSize = LoadOption->OptionalDataSize;
ImageInfo->LoadOptions = LoadOption->OptionalData;
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
index 6b8fb4d924..89595747af 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
/** @file
Misc library functions.
-Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
(C) Copyright 2016 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
**/
@@ -491,11 +491,21 @@ EfiBootManagerDispatchDeferredImages (
ImageDevicePath,
NULL,
0,
&ImageHandle
);
- if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
+ } else {
LoadCount++;
//
// Before calling the image, enable the Watchdog Timer for
// a 5 Minute period
//
--
2.18.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [edk2-devel] [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager: " Dandan Bi
@ 2019-09-24 13:21 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-24 13:42 ` Gao, Zhichao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2019-09-24 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel, dandan.bi
Cc: Jian J Wang, Hao A Wu, Ray Ni, Zhichao Gao, Liming Gao,
Laszlo Ersek
On 9/24/19 3:16 PM, Dandan Bi wrote:
> For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
> the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
> EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> This follows UEFI Spec.
>
> But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
> the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
> like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
> EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
>
> This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
> for the callers in UefiBootManagerLib which don't have the policy to defer
> the execution of the image.
>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
> Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> ---
> V3: Enahnce the error handling logic in BmLoadOption.c and BmMisc.c.
> MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c | 9 +++++++++
> .../Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> index 952033fc82..760d7647b8 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> @@ -1859,10 +1859,19 @@ EfiBootManagerBoot (
> if (FilePath != NULL) {
> FreePool (FilePath);
> }
>
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + //
> + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
> + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
> + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> + //
> + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> + }
> //
> // Report Status Code with the failure status to indicate that the failure to load boot option
> //
> BmReportLoadFailure (EFI_SW_DXE_BS_EC_BOOT_OPTION_LOAD_ERROR, Status);
> BootOption->Status = Status;
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> index 07592f8ebd..89372b3b97 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> /** @file
> Load option library functions which relate with creating and processing load options.
>
> -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> (C) Copyright 2015-2018 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>
> **/
>
> @@ -1409,11 +1409,21 @@ EfiBootManagerProcessLoadOption (
> FileSize,
> &ImageHandle
> );
> FreePool (FileBuffer);
>
> - if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + //
> + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
> + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
> + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> + //
> + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> + }
> + } else {
Thanks for changing this Dandan!
> Status = gBS->HandleProtocol (ImageHandle, &gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid, (VOID **)&ImageInfo);
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>
> ImageInfo->LoadOptionsSize = LoadOption->OptionalDataSize;
> ImageInfo->LoadOptions = LoadOption->OptionalData;
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> index 6b8fb4d924..89595747af 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> /** @file
> Misc library functions.
>
> -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> (C) Copyright 2016 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>
> **/
>
> @@ -491,11 +491,21 @@ EfiBootManagerDispatchDeferredImages (
> ImageDevicePath,
> NULL,
> 0,
> &ImageHandle
> );
> - if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + //
> + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
> + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
> + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> + //
> + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> + }
> + } else {
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
> LoadCount++;
> //
> // Before calling the image, enable the Watchdog Timer for
> // a 5 Minute period
> //
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [edk2-devel] [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:21 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2019-09-24 13:42 ` Gao, Zhichao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gao, Zhichao @ 2019-09-24 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, 'philmd@redhat.com', Bi, Dandan
Cc: Wang, Jian J, Wu, Hao A, Ni, Ray, Gao, Liming, Laszlo Ersek
Nice catch. Moving the check into the if conditional section would avoid the additional check when the status is EFI_SUCCESS.
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Thanks,
Zhichao
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 9:22 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>;
> Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>; Gao,
> Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager:
> Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
>
> On 9/24/19 3:16 PM, Dandan Bi wrote:
> > For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
> > the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
> > EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right
> now.
> > This follows UEFI Spec.
> >
> > But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer the
> > execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION like
> > any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
> > EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> >
> > This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
> > explicitly for the callers in UefiBootManagerLib which don't have the
> > policy to defer the execution of the image.
> >
> > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> > Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
> > Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > V3: Enahnce the error handling logic in BmLoadOption.c and BmMisc.c.
> > MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c | 9 +++++++++
> > .../Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c | 14
> ++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> > index 952033fc82..760d7647b8 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> > @@ -1859,10 +1859,19 @@ EfiBootManagerBoot (
> > if (FilePath != NULL) {
> > FreePool (FilePath);
> > }
> >
> > if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + //
> > + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an
> ImageHandle was created
> > + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not
> be started right now.
> > + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> > + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource
> leak.
> > + //
> > + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> > + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> > + }
> > //
> > // Report Status Code with the failure status to indicate that the failure
> to load boot option
> > //
> > BmReportLoadFailure
> (EFI_SW_DXE_BS_EC_BOOT_OPTION_LOAD_ERROR, Status);
> > BootOption->Status = Status;
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> > index 07592f8ebd..89372b3b97 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> > /** @file
> > Load option library functions which relate with creating and processing
> load options.
> >
> > -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > reserved.<BR>
> > +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > +reserved.<BR>
> > (C) Copyright 2015-2018 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
> > SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >
> > **/
> >
> > @@ -1409,11 +1409,21 @@ EfiBootManagerProcessLoadOption (
> > FileSize,
> > &ImageHandle
> > );
> > FreePool (FileBuffer);
> >
> > - if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + //
> > + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an
> ImageHandle was created
> > + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not
> be started right now.
> > + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> > + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource
> leak.
> > + //
> > + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> > + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> > + }
> > + } else {
>
> Thanks for changing this Dandan!
>
> > Status = gBS->HandleProtocol (ImageHandle,
> &gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid, (VOID **)&ImageInfo);
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> >
> > ImageInfo->LoadOptionsSize = LoadOption->OptionalDataSize;
> > ImageInfo->LoadOptions = LoadOption->OptionalData; diff --git
> > a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> > index 6b8fb4d924..89595747af 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> > /** @file
> > Misc library functions.
> >
> > -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > reserved.<BR>
> > +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > +reserved.<BR>
> > (C) Copyright 2016 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
> > SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >
> > **/
> >
> > @@ -491,11 +491,21 @@ EfiBootManagerDispatchDeferredImages (
> > ImageDevicePath,
> > NULL,
> > 0,
> > &ImageHandle
> > );
> > - if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > + //
> > + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and
> an ImageHandle was created
> > + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can
> not be started right now.
> > + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> > + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource
> leak.
> > + //
> > + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> > + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> > + }
> > + } else {
>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
>
> > LoadCount++;
> > //
> > // Before calling the image, enable the Watchdog Timer for
> > // a 5 Minute period
> > //
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [patch v3 4/5] MdeModulePkg/PlatformDriOverride: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:16 [patch v3 0/5] Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION Dandan Bi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 3/5] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManager: " Dandan Bi
@ 2019-09-24 13:16 ` Dandan Bi
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 5/5] ShellPkg: " Dandan Bi
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dandan Bi @ 2019-09-24 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel
Cc: Jian J Wang, Hao A Wu, Liming Gao, Laszlo Ersek,
Philippe Mathieu-Daude
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the caller in PlatformDriOverrideDxe which don't have the policy to
defer the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
---
.../PlatformDriOverrideDxe/PlatDriOverrideLib.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/PlatformDriOverrideDxe/PlatDriOverrideLib.c b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/PlatformDriOverrideDxe/PlatDriOverrideLib.c
index 2d3736b468..f91f038b7a 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/PlatformDriOverrideDxe/PlatDriOverrideLib.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/PlatformDriOverrideDxe/PlatDriOverrideLib.c
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
/** @file
Implementation of the shared functions to do the platform driver vverride mapping.
- Copyright (c) 2007 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+ Copyright (c) 2007 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
**/
#include "InternalPlatDriOverrideDxe.h"
@@ -1484,10 +1484,19 @@ GetDriverFromMapping (
);
ASSERT (DriverBinding != NULL);
DriverImageInfo->ImageHandle = ImageHandle;
}
} else {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
DriverImageInfo->UnLoadable = TRUE;
DriverImageInfo->ImageHandle = NULL;
}
}
}
--
2.18.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [patch v3 5/5] ShellPkg: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
2019-09-24 13:16 [patch v3 0/5] Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION Dandan Bi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-09-24 13:16 ` [patch v3 4/5] MdeModulePkg/PlatformDriOverride: " Dandan Bi
@ 2019-09-24 13:16 ` Dandan Bi
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dandan Bi @ 2019-09-24 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel; +Cc: Ray Ni, Zhichao Gao, Laszlo Ersek, Philippe Mathieu-Daude
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in ShellPkg which don't have the policy to defer the
execution of the image.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
---
ShellPkg/Application/Shell/ShellManParser.c | 9 +++++++++
.../Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/LoadPciRom.c | 11 ++++++++++-
ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Load.c | 11 ++++++++++-
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/ShellManParser.c b/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/ShellManParser.c
index 6909f29441..4d5a5668aa 100644
--- a/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/ShellManParser.c
+++ b/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/ShellManParser.c
@@ -643,10 +643,19 @@ ProcessManFile(
goto Done;
}
DevPath = ShellInfoObject.NewEfiShellProtocol->GetDevicePathFromFilePath(CmdFilePathName);
Status = gBS->LoadImage(FALSE, gImageHandle, DevPath, NULL, 0, &CmdFileImgHandle);
if(EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid the resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (CmdFileImgHandle);
+ }
*HelpText = NULL;
goto Done;
}
Status = gBS->OpenProtocol(
CmdFileImgHandle,
diff --git a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/LoadPciRom.c b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/LoadPciRom.c
index 1b169d0d3c..5b6cba17f3 100644
--- a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/LoadPciRom.c
+++ b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/LoadPciRom.c
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
/** @file
Main file for LoadPciRom shell Debug1 function.
(C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.<BR>
- Copyright (c) 2005 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+ Copyright (c) 2005 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
**/
#include "UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib.h"
@@ -332,10 +332,19 @@ LoadEfiDriversFromRomImage (
ImageBuffer,
ImageLength,
&ImageHandle
);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+ }
ShellPrintHiiEx(-1, -1, NULL, STRING_TOKEN (STR_LOADPCIROM_LOAD_FAIL), gShellDebug1HiiHandle, L"loadpcirom", FileName, ImageIndex);
// PrintToken (STRING_TOKEN (STR_LOADPCIROM_LOAD_IMAGE_ERROR), HiiHandle, ImageIndex, Status);
} else {
Status = gBS->StartImage (ImageHandle, NULL, NULL);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
diff --git a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Load.c b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Load.c
index 6a94b48c86..b6e7c952fa 100644
--- a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Load.c
+++ b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Load.c
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
/** @file
Main file for attrib shell level 2 function.
(C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.<BR>
- Copyright (c) 2009 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+ Copyright (c) 2009 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
**/
#include "UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib.h"
@@ -110,10 +110,19 @@ LoadDriver(
NULL,
0,
&LoadedDriverHandle);
if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
+ //
+ // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+ // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+ // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+ // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+ //
+ if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+ gBS->UnloadImage (LoadedDriverHandle);
+ }
ShellPrintHiiEx(-1, -1, NULL, STRING_TOKEN (STR_LOAD_NOT_IMAGE), gShellLevel2HiiHandle, FileName, Status);
} else {
//
// Make sure it is a driver image
//
--
2.18.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread