public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: expand comment on initial AP enumeration
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:29:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191010112952.7187-2-lersek@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010112952.7187-1-lersek@redhat.com>

Before adding another AP enumeration mode, clarify the documentation on
the current logic. No functional changes.

Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1515
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---

Notes:
    v2:
    - new patch

 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 38 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index d6f84c6f45c0..594a035d8b92 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -1045,14 +1045,36 @@ WakeUpAP (
     }
     if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitConfig) {
       //
-      // Here support two methods to collect AP count through adjust
-      // PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds values.
-      //
-      // one way is set a value to just let the first AP to start the
-      // initialization, then through the later while loop to wait all Aps
-      // finsh the initialization.
-      // The other way is set a value to let all APs finished the initialzation.
-      // In this case, the later while loop is useless.
+      // The AP enumeration algorithm below is suitable for two use cases.
+      //
+      // (1) The check-in time for an individual AP is bounded, and APs run
+      //     through their initialization routines strongly concurrently. In
+      //     particular, the number of concurrently running APs
+      //     ("NumApsExecuting") is never expected to fall to zero
+      //     *temporarily* -- it is expected to fall to zero only when all
+      //     APs have checked-in.
+      //
+      //     In this case, the platform is supposed to set
+      //     PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds to a low-ish value (just long
+      //     enough for one AP to start initialization). The timeout will be
+      //     reached soon, and remaining APs are collected by watching
+      //     NumApsExecuting fall to zero. If NumApsExecuting falls to zero
+      //     mid-process, while some APs have not completed initialization,
+      //     the behavior is undefined.
+      //
+      // (2) The check-in time for an individual AP is unbounded, and/or APs
+      //     may complete their initializations widely spread out. In
+      //     particular, some APs may finish initialization before some APs
+      //     even start.
+      //
+      //     In this case, the platform is supposed to set
+      //     PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds to a high-ish value. The AP
+      //     enumeration will always take that long (except when the boot CPU
+      //     count happens to be maximal, that is,
+      //     PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber). All APs are expected to
+      //     check-in before the timeout, and NumApsExecuting is assumed zero
+      //     at timeout. APs that miss the time-out may cause undefined
+      //     behavior.
       //
       TimedWaitForApFinish (
         CpuMpData,
-- 
2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201



  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-10 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-10 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: introduce PcdCpuBootLogicalProcessorNumber Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 11:29 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-10-11  8:19   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: expand comment on initial AP enumeration Ni, Ray
2019-10-10 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: honor the platform's boot CPU count in AP detection Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-11  8:22   ` Ni, Ray
2019-10-11 21:31     ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191010112952.7187-2-lersek@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox