From: "Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: rewrite MaxCpuCountInitialization() for CPU hotplug
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:27:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024142757.GN1138@perard.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022221554.14963-4-lersek@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> MaxCpuCountInitialization() currently handles the following options:
>
> (1) QEMU does not report the boot CPU count (FW_CFG_NB_CPUS is 0)
>
> In this case, PlatformPei makes MpInitLib enumerate APs up to the
> default PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber value (64) minus 1, or until
> the default PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds (50,000) elapses.
> (Whichever is reached first.)
>
> Time-limited AP enumeration had never been reliable on QEMU/KVM, which
> is why commit 45a70db3c3a5 strated handling case (2) below, in OVMF.
>
> (2) QEMU reports the boot CPU count (FW_CFG_NB_CPUS is nonzero)
>
> In this case, PlatformPei sets
>
> - PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber to the reported boot CPU count
> (FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, which exports "PCMachineState.boot_cpus"),
>
> - and PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds to practically "infinity"
> (MAX_UINT32, ~71 minutes).
>
> That causes MpInitLib to enumerate exactly the present (boot) APs.
>
> With CPU hotplug in mind, this method is not good enough. Because,
> using QEMU terminology, UefiCpuPkg expects
> PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber to provide the "possible CPUs" count
> ("MachineState.smp.max_cpus"), which includes present and not present
> CPUs both (with not present CPUs being subject for hot-plugging).
> FW_CFG_NB_CPUS does not include not present CPUs.
>
> Rewrite MaxCpuCountInitialization() for handling the following cases:
>
> (1) The behavior of case (1) does not change. (No UefiCpuPkg PCDs are set
> to values different from the defaults.)
>
> (2) QEMU reports the boot CPU count ("PCMachineState.boot_cpus", via
> FW_CFG_NB_CPUS), but not the possible CPUs count
> ("MachineState.smp.max_cpus").
>
> In this case, the behavior remains unchanged.
>
> The way MpInitLib is instructed to do the same differs however: we now
> set the new PcdCpuBootLogicalProcessorNumber to the boot CPU count
> (while continuing to set PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber identically).
> PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds becomes irrelevant.
>
> (3) QEMU reports both the boot CPU count ("PCMachineState.boot_cpus", via
> FW_CFG_NB_CPUS), and the possible CPUs count
> ("MachineState.smp.max_cpus").
>
> We tell UefiCpuPkg about the possible CPUs count through
> PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber. We also tell MpInitLib the boot CPU
> count for precise and quick AP enumeration, via
> PcdCpuBootLogicalProcessorNumber. PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds is
> irrelevant again.
>
> This patch is a pre-requisite for enabling CPU hotplug with SMM_REQUIRE.
> As a side effect, the patch also enables S3 to work with CPU hotplug at
> once, *without* SMM_REQUIRE.
>
> (Without the patch, S3 resume fails, if a CPU is hot-plugged at OS
> runtime, prior to suspend: the FW_CFG_NB_CPUS increase seen during resume
> causes PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber to increase as well, which is not
> permitted.
>
> With the patch, PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber stays the same, namely
> "MachineState.smp.max_cpus". Therefore, the CPU structures allocated
> during normal boot can accommodate the CPUs at S3 resume that have been
> hotplugged prior to S3 suspend.)
>
> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1515
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Xen falls into case (1) and OVMF still boots fine with the series
applied.
Thanks,
--
Anthony PERARD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-22 22:15 [PATCH v2 0/3] OvmfPkg: distinguish boot CPU count from possible CPU count Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc: remove PcdCpu* dynamic defaults Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 14:18 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-10-22 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] OvmfPkg/IndustryStandard: define macros for QEMU's CPU hotplug registers Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-23 12:05 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-24 10:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 15:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-25 8:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-24 11:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-29 14:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-29 17:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: rewrite MaxCpuCountInitialization() for CPU hotplug Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 14:27 ` Anthony PERARD [this message]
2019-10-24 15:28 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 15:33 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-25 8:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-25 9:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-23 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] OvmfPkg: distinguish boot CPU count from possible CPU count Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024142757.GN1138@perard.uk.xensource.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox