public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Jiaxin Wu" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
	"Maciej Rabeda" <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Siyuan Fu" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe: handle competing DHCP servers (more) gracefully
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 02:47:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331004749.16128-1-lersek@redhat.com> (raw)

When DHCP is misconfigured on a network segment, such that two DHCP
servers attempt to reply to requests (and therefore race with each other),
the edk2 PXE client can confuse itself.

In PxeBcDhcp4BootInfo() / PxeBcDhcp6BootInfo(), the client may refer to a
DHCP reply packet as an "earlier" packet from the "same" DHCP server, when
in reality both packets are unrelated, and arrive from different DHCP
servers.

While the edk2 PXE client can do nothing to fix this, it should at least
not ASSERT() -- ASSERT() is for catching programming errors (violations of
invariants that are under the control of the programmer). ASSERT()s should
in particular not refer to external data (such as network packets). What's
more, in RELEASE builds, we get NULL pointer references.

Check the problem conditions with actual "if"s, and return
EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR. This will trickle out to PxeBcLoadBootFile(), and be
reported as "PXE-E99: Unexpected network error".

Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---

Notes:
    Repo:   https://pagure.io/lersek/edk2.git
    Branch: dhcp_assert

 NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c b/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c
index 10bbb06f7593..d062a526077b 100644
--- a/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c
+++ b/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c
@@ -482,7 +482,20 @@ PxeBcDhcp4BootInfo (
     Cache4 = &Private->DhcpAck.Dhcp4;
   }
 
-  ASSERT (Cache4->OptList[PXEBC_DHCP4_TAG_INDEX_BOOTFILE] != NULL);
+  if (Cache4->OptList[PXEBC_DHCP4_TAG_INDEX_BOOTFILE] == NULL) {
+    //
+    // This should never happen in a correctly configured DHCP / PXE
+    // environment. One misconfiguration that can cause it is two DHCP servers
+    // mistakenly running on the same network segment at the same time, and
+    // racing each other in answering DHCP requests. Thus, the DHCP packets
+    // that the edk2 PXE client considers "belonging together" may actually be
+    // entirely independent, coming from two (competing) DHCP servers.
+    //
+    // Try to deal with this gracefully. Note that this check is not
+    // comprehensive, as we don't try to identify all such errors.
+    //
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
 
   //
   // Parse the boot server address.
@@ -612,7 +625,20 @@ PxeBcDhcp6BootInfo (
     Cache6 = &Private->DhcpAck.Dhcp6;
   }
 
-  ASSERT (Cache6->OptList[PXEBC_DHCP6_IDX_BOOT_FILE_URL] != NULL);
+  if (Cache6->OptList[PXEBC_DHCP6_IDX_BOOT_FILE_URL] == NULL) {
+    //
+    // This should never happen in a correctly configured DHCP / PXE
+    // environment. One misconfiguration that can cause it is two DHCP servers
+    // mistakenly running on the same network segment at the same time, and
+    // racing each other in answering DHCP requests. Thus, the DHCP packets
+    // that the edk2 PXE client considers "belonging together" may actually be
+    // entirely independent, coming from two (competing) DHCP servers.
+    //
+    // Try to deal with this gracefully. Note that this check is not
+    // comprehensive, as we don't try to identify all such errors.
+    //
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
 
   //
   // Set the station address to IP layer.
-- 
2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201


             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31  0:47 Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-03-31 12:05 ` [PATCH] NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe: handle competing DHCP servers (more) gracefully Siyuan, Fu
2020-03-31 17:49 ` [edk2-devel] " Maciej Rabeda
2020-04-01 14:41   ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200331004749.16128-1-lersek@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox