From: "Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>, <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Subject: Re: OvmfPkg XenPkg: X64 DEBUG GCC5 -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build is broken
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:38:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420123840.GO4088@perard.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd2eb882-087b-cbca-5288-805c9d368ca8@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 04:04:35PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 04/14/20 20:01, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> > I was trying to build OvmfPkg/XenPkg -a X64 -t GCC5 -b DEBUG
> > -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE, but the build fails. Both plain DEBUG and
> > RELEASE builds without trying to put the debug output on the serial
> > port work.
> >
> >
> > [bcran@smic ~/src/tmp/edk2]$ build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc -a X64 -t
> > GCC5 -b DEBUG -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE
> > Build environment: FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-64bit-ELF
> > Build start time: 11:59:24, Apr.14 2020
> >
> > WORKSPACE = /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2
> > EDK_TOOLS_PATH = /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/BaseTools
> > CONF_PATH = /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/Conf
> > PYTHON_COMMAND = /usr/local/bin/python3
> >
> >
> > Processing meta-data .
> > Architecture(s) = X64
> > Build target = DEBUG
> > Toolchain = GCC5
> >
> > Active Platform = /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc
> > .
> >
> > build.py...
> > /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc(...): error F002: Library
> > [/home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/MdePkg/Library/UefiBootServicesTableLib/UefiBootServicesTableLib.inf]
> > with constructors has a cycle
> > consumed by
> > /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.inf
> > consumed by
> > /home/bcran/src/tmp/edk2/MdePkg/Library/UefiDevicePathLibDevicePathProtocol/UefiDevicePathLibDevicePathProtocol.inf
>
> From commit 05480e2fd4ff ("OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Use a Xen
> console for ConOut/ConIn", 2019-08-21), we have:
>
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc
> > index 54ac910d8eed..e719a168f81e 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc
> > @@ -586,6 +586,10 @@ [Components]
> > OvmfPkg/XenIoPciDxe/XenIoPciDxe.inf
> > OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenBusDxe.inf
> > OvmfPkg/XenPvBlkDxe/XenPvBlkDxe.inf
> > + MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialDxe.inf {
> > + <LibraryClasses>
> > + SerialPortLib|OvmfPkg/Library/XenConsoleSerialPortLib/XenConsoleSerialPortLib.inf
> > + }
> > MdeModulePkg/Universal/WatchdogTimerDxe/WatchdogTimer.inf
> > MdeModulePkg/Universal/MonotonicCounterRuntimeDxe/MonotonicCounterRuntimeDxe.inf
> > MdeModulePkg/Universal/CapsuleRuntimeDxe/CapsuleRuntimeDxe.inf
>
> If you run the "build" command with the "-v" option added, the last part
> (just preceding the error message above) is:
>
> > Library instances of module [MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialDxe.inf] [X64]:
> > UefiDriverEntryPoint : MdePkg/Library/UefiDriverEntryPoint/UefiDriverEntryPoint.inf
> > UefiBootServicesTableLib : MdePkg/Library/UefiBootServicesTableLib/UefiBootServicesTableLib.inf
> > DebugLib : MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf
> > PcdLib : MdePkg/Library/DxePcdLib/DxePcdLib.inf
> > SerialPortLib : OvmfPkg/Library/XenConsoleSerialPortLib/XenConsoleSerialPortLib.inf
> > BaseLib : MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/BaseLib.inf
> > XenHypercallLib : OvmfPkg/Library/XenHypercallLib/XenHypercallLib.inf
> > HobLib : MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/DxeHobLib.inf
> > BaseMemoryLib : MdePkg/Library/BaseMemoryLibRepStr/BaseMemoryLibRepStr.inf
> > UefiLib : MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.inf
> > PrintLib : MdePkg/Library/BasePrintLib/BasePrintLib.inf
> > MemoryAllocationLib : MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/UefiMemoryAllocationLib.inf
> > DevicePathLib : MdePkg/Library/UefiDevicePathLibDevicePathProtocol/UefiDevicePathLibDevicePathProtocol.inf
> > UefiRuntimeServicesTableLib : MdePkg/Library/UefiRuntimeServicesTableLib/UefiRuntimeServicesTableLib.inf
> > DebugPrintErrorLevelLib : MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugPrintErrorLevelLib/BaseDebugPrintErrorLevelLib.inf
>
> The dependency loop is formed by:
>
> DebugLib : BaseDebugLibSerialPort ->
> SerialPortLib : XenConsoleSerialPortLib ->
> XenHypercallLib : XenHypercallLib ->
> DebugLib
>
> where all the library instances BaseDebugLibSerialPort,
> XenConsoleSerialPortLib, XenHypercallLib have constructors.
>
> Note that XenConsoleSerialPortLib *itself* is careful to avoid a
> DebugLib dependency; from "XenConsoleSerialPortLib.c":
>
> > //
> > // We can't use DebugLib due to a constructor dependency cycle between DebugLib
> > // and ourselves.
> > //
> > #define ASSERT(Expression) \
> > do { \
> > if (!(Expression)) { \
> > CpuDeadLoop (); \
> > } \
> > } while (FALSE)
>
> However, XenConsoleSerialPortLib still inherits a DebugLib dependency
> through XenHypercallLib -- but only on IA32/X64, not on ARM/AARCH64! See
> "XenHypercallLib.inf":
>
> > [LibraryClasses.IA32, LibraryClasses.X64]
> > BaseLib
> > HobLib
> > DebugLib
>
> There is no issue without specifying DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT, because
> OvmfXen resolves DebugLib to PlatformDebugLibIoPort then, which does not
> depend on SerialPortLib (thus the cycle is severed).
>
>
> Now, I think there may not be a simple solution for this, because, as
> the message on commit 05480e2fd4ff says, "On a Xen PVH guest, none of
> the existing serial or console interface works".
>
> So even if we eliminated the constructor cycle for this module -- i.e.,
> SerialDxe -- somehow [1], the larger DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT feature might
> not be feasible for *some* module types in OvmfXen. Because,
> XenConsoleSerialPortLib ultimately depends on hypercalls, and I'm unsure
> if those could be used as early as in SEC / PEI.
>
> [1] For breaking up just this one constructor cycle, I guess we could
> remove the DebugLib dependency from XenHypercallLib even on
> IA32/X64.
>
> In other words, I'm not sure if you could send any DEBUG messages *at
> all* to the Xen serial port as early as in SEC or PEI. Meaning that even
> if DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT didn't break the build, it still wouldn't
> (comprehensively) do what its name says.
>
> I figure you attempted the DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT build because without it
> you get no debug output at all (due to the default
> PlatformDebugLibIoPort resolution, which produces no logs on Xen).
>
> For a start, I would recommend removing DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT altogether
> from OvmfXen (to decrease confusion and to eliminate the build
> breakage), and then filing a feature request in the TianoCore bugzilla
> for "some" kind of debug logging in OvmfXen, if the latter is possible.
Thanks Laszlo for the investigation. I usually use DebugLib to debug
OVMF under Xen, I just need to enable the debug port of QEMU. And for
when QEMU isn't available (when running Xen PVH guest), I have a local
patch that I haven't send upstream yet. It's a hacked version of
PlatformDebugLibIoPort which sends logs to Xen's debug port, and doesn't
check if the port is open.
I'll prepare a patch to remove DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT support from OvmfXen
and send my other patch.
Thanks,
--
Anthony PERARD
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 18:01 OvmfPkg XenPkg: X64 DEBUG GCC5 -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build is broken Rebecca Cran
2020-04-15 14:04 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-04-15 14:20 ` Rebecca Cran
2020-04-16 16:52 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-04-20 12:38 ` Anthony PERARD [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200420123840.GO4088@perard.uk.xensource.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox