public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leif Lindholm" <leif@nuviainc.com>
To: "Pankaj Bansal (OSS)" <pankaj.bansal@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com>,
	Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>,
	Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>,
	Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 8/9] Platform/NXP: Add LX2160ARDB Platform
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:03:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529140310.GN1923@vanye> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB593358652F00B503B7639039F18F0@VI1PR04MB5933.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:25:43 +0000, Pankaj Bansal (OSS) wrote:
> > > I intentionally kept these in this order. because Soc depends on Chassis for any
> > include files
> > > Chassis depends on NxpQoriqLs.dec for any include files.
> > 
> > OK, I see the logic behind that, but as it has no functional meaning I
> > don't think it outweighs the benefit of alphabetical sorting.
> > 
> 
> I referred to the inf specifications for this:
> https://edk2-docs.gitbook.io/edk-ii-inf-specification/3_edk_ii_inf_file_format/37_-packages-_sections
> 
> "Packages must be listed in the order that may be required for
> specifying include path statements for a compiler.
> For example, the MdePkg/MdePkg.dec file must be listed before the
> MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec file"

I see that. (And sigh.) Clearly, that needs to be fixed. I have cc:d
you on the patch to do that.

I am sure that made sense when that text was originally written, which
was presumably the previous millenium. But this is akin to "optimising"
the order in which header files is included.

> By design the Chassis package files can include generic NXP package
> files. not the other way around.
> same goes for SOC package files. SOC package files can include
> Chassis Package file but not the other way around
> and we can extend this further. any platform package files can
> include SOC package files
> 
> > I *do* tend to say "alphabetically, unless there is a better logical
> > order", but by that I usually mean grouping related Pcd dependency
> > declarations.
> 
> as I mentioned above, there *is* a logical order to packages.

And as I said "I see the logic behind that".
I'm saying readability trumps that logic.

> > 
> > This is my only remaining niggle with this set - are you OK with me
> > folding in
> > 
> > --- a/Platform/NXP/LX2160aRdbPkg/Library/ArmPlatformLib/ArmPlatformLib.inf
> > +++
> > b/Platform/NXP/LX2160aRdbPkg/Library/ArmPlatformLib/ArmPlatformLib.inf
> > @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ [Packages]
> >    MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> >    ArmPkg/ArmPkg.dec
> >    ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec
> > -  Silicon/NXP/NxpQoriqLs.dec
> >    Silicon/NXP/Chassis3V2/Chassis3V2.dec
> >    Silicon/NXP/LX2160A/LX2160A.dec
> > +  Silicon/NXP/NxpQoriqLs.dec
> > 
> > to v3 9/10 and pushing the set?
> > 
> > /
> >     Leif

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-27  8:51 [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 0/9] Add LX2160ARDB Platform Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 1/9] Silicon/NXP: Use Metronome implementation from MdeModulePkg Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 2/9] Platform/NXP: Use Monotonic counter " Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 3/9] Silicon/NXP: Use edk2 recommended compilation flags Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-28 14:48   ` Leif Lindholm
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 4/9] Platform/NXP/LX2160ARDB: Add ArmPlatformLib Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 5/9] Silicon/NXP: Implement PL011UartClockLib for NXP platforms Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 6/9] Silicon/NXP: Add Chassis3V2 Package Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 7/9] Silicon/NXP: Add LX2160A Soc package Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 8/9] Platform/NXP: Add LX2160ARDB Platform Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-28 15:00   ` Leif Lindholm
2020-05-29  5:21     ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-29 11:49       ` Leif Lindholm
2020-05-29 12:25         ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-29 14:03           ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2020-05-30 12:19             ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-27  8:51 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 9/9] Platform/NXP/LX2160aRdbPkg: Add VarStore Pankaj Bansal
2020-05-28 14:58 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 0/9] Add LX2160ARDB Platform Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200529140310.GN1923@vanye \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox