From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.8172.1594979395244382704 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:49:55 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@nuviainc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ARII+/sM; spf=pass (domain: nuviainc.com, ip: 209.85.128.65, mailfrom: leif@nuviainc.com) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j18so14011054wmi.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:49:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuviainc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4Tn20rsD1GQ0loRECMClgdLo7tqmgfvtzNzNwSCcieM=; b=ARII+/sMOfl+nx5FUst56X9mwe5mIs06w78bFMY2CYZnc1AtmeEi0hwpmJKPr7PfIC 7C1xmYVa2Cp9EPVDoqpJ54FiUd0CHpj5CCVLDEjyJjDjoMjFgTpt3d7wkQ/yywAa+JcM axN3Lf0wNDj9yA6lixSIYL46M6Kd3KRXHaeDl2FL0bb3c/BK8vcBh1nr8k7hgwCuoOJn iyoM2NJ7gGNjajmgIA+LNhV6Mjqd+JS3t+1OPgYDxrzzObf4Vwc4vcf8YG/CNA3gqsMd B2YI4atXVQo4FN7ptWcJYFaRsP/khBi1yGlkkEyCd8R2pcj/lbX212z6c/6RsOnNZO2/ zGpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4Tn20rsD1GQ0loRECMClgdLo7tqmgfvtzNzNwSCcieM=; b=i4h4eS7RjhnYOx+4WgRTiGOmiW0ONFkJJQmBJwveH4X941vDtFOTkidRko8kicjhd+ wJAha/GHHRZoJ/uVVBH8yog2hiPaX9N72w/12E6hjY7WLVYnzHgzNLYVLsduETctojoV PiqNCJidsl3QhUkjiPFSsUA6Gv9cWYlvnp42q8Kw3QNVPlsyf6wBisZOphgB5cKdwp3Z kd1U7Hv3Sol7F9eaJ3K/1zUH8QcE182YkZwe/fPBmDpDO4I1EbN1tJ9naeC05IR8WN1u hJvc8iAbvfCbWTom7LgpjuCoZyDAHs8F4sg6WmLVO6YfOiThDUsHNu8wjIDzVgtNhn2V ke+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vWnr8SBQ0y6gaP+0X/DVusEKDwD6nPNitUqWTAvJ+133KsFnV QoaTxAicP/HvB0VQNk4RvdPzdw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1Tcgs/wEilokoRsG0KDuDax3W5M/+7LWvfDsCXnGwHYD3Oxpf/NKXnYbNNCTPH7s7UOz2/A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:241:: with SMTP id 1mr8355746wmj.119.1594979393780; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from vanye ([2001:470:1f09:12f0:b26e:bfff:fea9:f1b8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm12927950wme.23.2020.07.17.02.49.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:49:49 +0100 From: "Leif Lindholm" To: "Wang, Jian J" Cc: Laszlo Ersek , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "Yao, Jiewen" , Andrew Fish , "Kinney, Michael D" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Maintainers.txt: Remove invalid email address and a few other role changes Message-ID: <20200717094949.GK12303@vanye> References: <20200716093154.862-1-jian.j.wang@intel.com> <1ddc75fb-a009-872b-6c9b-3ec5087acc5e@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 07:41:40 +0000, Wang, Jian J wrote: > > > SecurityPkg: Secure boot related modules > > > F: SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/ > > > @@ -480,8 +480,7 @@ M: Zhichao Gao > > > SignedCapsulePkg > > > F: SignedCapsulePkg/ > > > W: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/SignedCapsulePkg > > > -M: Jiewen Yao > > > -M: Chao Zhang > > > +M: Jian J Wang > > > > > > SourceLevelDebugPkg > > > F: SourceLevelDebugPkg/ > > > > > > > If Chao still has access to his @intel.com email address (just working > > in a different role), then it would be nice if he could send an ACK. > > > > (The commit message says Chao has left the community, which I understand > > to be the upstream edk2 project; so in theory his Intel email address > > could still function. On the other hand, the subject line says the email > > address is now "invalid", so I can't really tell.) > > Sorry I brought confusions to you. Actually he left both Intel and community > so the email address is not valid any more. I don' t have his new address and > cannot notify him in this mailing list. But I did get his ACK through WeChat. OK. This is not a very unusual situation. However, given that, can we break out Chao from this patch and merge it separately, stating those reasons. If the commit message says so, the patch is sent by an Intel employee and we can have a reviewed-by from another Intel employee (like we did for Supreeth for uefi-sct), I think that would make the history very clear. Regards, Leif > Regards, > Jian > > > > > > Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek > > > > Thanks > > Laszlo >