Re: [PATCH v0] Platform/NXP: Add Dynamic Acpi for layerscape platforms

["Leif Lindholm" <leif@nuviainc.com>]

Hi Vikas,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:11:43 +0530, Vikas Singh wrote:
> > > > > +/** A helper macro for returning configuration manager objects
> > > > > +*/
> > > > > +#define HANDLE_CM_OBJECT(ObjId, CmObjectId, Object, ObjectCount)      \
> > > > > +  case ObjId: {                                                       \
> > > > > +    CmObject->ObjectId = CmObjectId;                                  \
> > > > > +    CmObject->Size = sizeof (Object);                                 \
> > > > > +    CmObject->Data = (VOID*)&Object;                                  \
> > > > > +    CmObject->Count = ObjectCount;                                    \
> > > > > +    DEBUG ((                                                          \
> > > > > +      DEBUG_INFO,                                                     \
> > > > > +      #CmObjectId ": Ptr = 0x%p, Size = %d, Count = %d\n",            \
> > > > > +      CmObject->Data,                                                 \
> > > > > +      CmObject->Size,                                                 \
> > > > > +      CmObject->Count                                                 \
> > > > > +      ));                                                             \
> > > > > +    break;                                                            \
> > > > > +  }
> > > >
> > > > This is code obfuscation. Please don't invent your own programming
> > > > languages. In C, the case, the start bracket, the break and the end
> > > > bracket always go inline.
> > > > The rest would be better as a static helper function than a macro.
> > > >
> > > Leif, changes are in accordance with :
> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tianocore-docs/Docs/master/Specifications/CCS_2_1_Draft.pdf
> >
> > Do you mean 5.5.2.1:
> > Functional macros are generally discouraged.
> > ?
> 
> Leif + Sami, I was referring section 5.7.3.7, since you commented on
> switch case & break statement.
> However keeping section 5.5.2.1 in consideration, I have done few
> changes and shared updated V1 series.
> Could you please have a look on it and revert, if in case you have any concerns.

I have not seen any update?

Please have a look at Sami's updates to the ARM platform code, which I
merged yeaterday.

Best Regards,

Leif