Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] SEV Live Migration support for OVMF.

["Ashish Kalra" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>]

Hello Laszlo,

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/23/21 18:42, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 06/22/21 19:46, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> 
> >> Please find below your reply on v3 of this patch-set :
> >>
> >> Please include such a patch in v4 -- if Tom and Brijesh agree, I'd like to put the new lib explicitly under their reviewership.
> >>
> >> Also, I plan to review this series (v4, at this point) only for formalities. I'd like to receive an R-b from Tom or Brijesh [*], and another from Dov or a colleague at IBM, for this series; those together should suffice for merging the library.
> >>
> >> So, if you are fine with this approach, then probably Tom or Brijesh can
> >> take these patches under their reviewership and provide their R-b for
> >> this patch-set to be accepted and merged.
> > 
> > Indeed. This helps. Thanks.
> > 
> > I'll keep this patch set in my review queue then, for said "formalities
> > review".
> 
> Please do file a TianoCore Feature Request BZ for this, and reference
> the bug URL in the commit messages. One important purpose of such a BZ
> is to succinctly link together all versions of a patch set -- that way
> poor maintainers know where to find previous versions, even if the blurb
> subject line changes over time. I also like to capture "permanent
> workflow notes" like the above in BZs (basically a high-level summary of
> who does what).
> 

I have filed a new TianoCore Feature request BZ for this.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3467

I will refer this bug in future commit messages for this patch-set. 

Please let me know if you want me to add additional contents and
comments to this bug.

Thanks,
Ashish

> For now it seems that a v5 will be necessary. Please keep me on CC, and
> when you have the BZ filed, we should link all past and future versions
> into it.
> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>