From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, sunil.vl@gmail.com,
Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>, Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>,
Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BaseTools GenFw: Add support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:44:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210713101408.GA72964@sunil-ThinkPad-T490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a9012d4-512b-e545-5541-39986d5a7b50@hpe.com>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:27:30PM +0800, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
> Looks good. I compared it with existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I and looked at
> the differences.
>
Thanks Daniel.
> This one doesn't do use mRiscVPass1GotFixup.
> I assume this is an optimization that's not possible here?
GOT fixup is required only for load to avoid the indirection for symbol
resolution.
Thanks
Sunil
>
> Haven't tested that it works but since it works for Pete:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 7/10/21 2:31 PM, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459
> >
> > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type.
> > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation
> > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> >
> > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
> > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
> > ---
> > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644
> > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
> > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20));
> > break;
> > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S:
> > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) {
> > + int i;
> > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20));
> > +
> > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5);
> > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5)));
> > +
> > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) {
> > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1);
> > + }
> > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex];
> > +
> > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) {
> > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096);
> > + Value2 -= i;
> > + Value += 4096 * i;
> > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) {
> > + Value2 -= 1;
> > + Value += 4096;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) {
> > + i = (Value / 4096);
> > + Value2 += i;
> > + Value -= 4096 * i;
> > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) {
> > + Value2 += 1;
> > + Value -= 4096;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction
> > + //
> > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0|
> > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------|
> > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode|
> > + // ---------------------------------------------------
> > +
> > + // First Zero out current IMM
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80;
> > +
> > + // Update with new IMM
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25);
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7);
> > +
> > + // Update previous instruction
> > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12));
> > + }
> > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL;
> > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL;
> > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0;
> > + break;
> > +
> > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I:
> > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) {
> > int i;
> > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 (
> > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20:
> > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20:
> > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I:
> > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S:
> > break;
> > default:
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 6:31 [PATCH] BaseTools GenFw: Add support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation Sunil V L
2021-07-12 11:51 ` Pete Batard
2021-07-12 13:39 ` 回复: " gaoliming
2021-07-13 2:44 ` Abner Chang
2021-07-13 9:27 ` Daniel Schaefer
2021-07-13 10:14 ` Sunil V L [this message]
2021-07-20 5:48 ` 回复: " gaoliming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210713101408.GA72964@sunil-ThinkPad-T490 \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox