From: "Michael Kubacki" <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>,
Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 4/5] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Improve adjacent region checking
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:32:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210806013250.2928-5-mikuback@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806013250.2928-1-mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3521
The current logic depends on a particular order in which the
descriptors for three or more regions are placed in the array to
perform proper adjacency checking. When three or more regions are
all adjacent, but neighboring descriptors are not adjacent, the
logic can improperly report a failure. Adjust the logic so that
all descriptors are checked for adjacency.
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
---
Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckSmmInfo.c | 56 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckSmmInfo.c b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckSmmInfo.c
index c493750a27e6..f15f76eab574 100644
--- a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckSmmInfo.c
+++ b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckSmmInfo.c
@@ -59,34 +59,36 @@ CheckSmramDescriptor (
)
{
UINTN Index;
- UINT64 Base;
+ UINTN Index2;
UINT64 Length;
+ BOOLEAN AdjacentRegion;
- Base = 0;
Length = 0;
for (Index = 0; Index < NumberOfSmmReservedRegions; Index++) {
- if (Base == 0) {
- Base = Descriptor[Index].PhysicalStart;
- Length = Descriptor[Index].PhysicalSize;
+ AdjacentRegion = FALSE;
+ for (Index2 = 0; Index2 < NumberOfSmmReservedRegions; Index2++) {
+ if ((NumberOfSmmReservedRegions == 1)
+ || (Descriptor[Index].PhysicalStart + Descriptor[Index].PhysicalSize == Descriptor[Index2].PhysicalStart)
+ || (Descriptor[Index2].PhysicalStart + Descriptor[Index2].PhysicalSize == Descriptor[Index].PhysicalStart)) {
+ AdjacentRegion = TRUE;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (AdjacentRegion == TRUE) {
+ Length += Descriptor[Index].PhysicalSize;
} else {
- if (Base + Length == Descriptor[Index].PhysicalStart) {
- Length = Length + Descriptor[Index].PhysicalSize;
- } else if (Descriptor[Index].PhysicalStart + Descriptor[Index].PhysicalSize == Base) {
- Base = Descriptor[Index].PhysicalStart;
- Length = Length + Descriptor[Index].PhysicalSize;
- } else {
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Smram is not adjacent\n"));
- TestPointLibAppendErrorString (
- PLATFORM_TEST_POINT_ROLE_PLATFORM_IBV,
- NULL,
- TEST_POINT_BYTE7_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK_SMRAM_ALIGNED_ERROR_CODE \
- TEST_POINT_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK
- TEST_POINT_BYTE7_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK_SMRAM_ALIGNED_ERROR_STRING
- );
- return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
- }
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Smram is not adjacent\n"));
+ TestPointLibAppendErrorString (
+ PLATFORM_TEST_POINT_ROLE_PLATFORM_IBV,
+ NULL,
+ TEST_POINT_BYTE7_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK_SMRAM_ALIGNED_ERROR_CODE \
+ TEST_POINT_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK
+ TEST_POINT_BYTE7_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK_SMRAM_ALIGNED_ERROR_STRING
+ );
+ return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
}
- }
+ }
if (Length != GetPowerOfTwo64 (Length)) {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Smram is not aligned\n"));
@@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ CheckSmramDescriptor (
PLATFORM_TEST_POINT_ROLE_PLATFORM_IBV,
NULL,
TEST_POINT_BYTE7_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK_SMRAM_ALIGNED_ERROR_CODE \
- TEST_POINT_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK
+ TEST_POINT_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK
TEST_POINT_BYTE7_DXE_SMM_READY_TO_LOCK_SMRAM_ALIGNED_ERROR_STRING
);
return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
@@ -111,14 +113,14 @@ TestPointCheckSmmInfo (
EFI_SMM_ACCESS2_PROTOCOL *SmmAccess;
UINTN Size;
EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR *SmramRanges;
-
+
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "==== TestPointCheckSmmInfo - Enter\n"));
-
+
Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gEfiSmmAccess2ProtocolGuid, NULL, (VOID **)&SmmAccess);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
goto Done ;
}
-
+
Size = 0;
Status = SmmAccess->GetCapabilities (SmmAccess, &Size, NULL);
ASSERT (Status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL);
@@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ TestPointCheckSmmInfo (
Status = SmmAccess->GetCapabilities (SmmAccess, &Size, SmramRanges);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
-
+
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "SMRAM Info\n"));
DumpSmramDescriptor (Size / sizeof (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR), SmramRanges);
--
2.28.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-06 1:32 [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 0/5] MinPlatformPkg: TestPointCheckLib bug fixes and improvements Michael Kubacki
2021-08-06 1:32 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 1/5] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Fix MessageLength cast issue Michael Kubacki
2021-08-06 1:32 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 2/5] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Set required size field in protocol Michael Kubacki
2021-08-06 1:32 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 3/5] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Fix incorrect array index Michael Kubacki
2021-08-06 1:32 ` Michael Kubacki [this message]
2021-08-06 1:32 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 5/5] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Make OutTable parameter optional Michael Kubacki
2021-08-09 19:18 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 0/5] MinPlatformPkg: TestPointCheckLib bug fixes and improvements Nate DeSimone
2021-08-09 19:26 ` Nate DeSimone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210806013250.2928-5-mikuback@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox