public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leif Lindholm" <leif@nuviainc.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, sami.mujawar@arm.com,
	gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg/GicV3Dxe: Don't signal EOI on arbitrary interrupts
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:50:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210825125042.ga3ls2th2l2dotnd@leviathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210824153132.5379-1-ardb@kernel.org>

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 17:31:32 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Currently, at ExitBootServices() time, the GICv3 driver signals
> End-Of-Interrupt (EOI) on all interrupt lines that are supported by the
> interrupt controller. This appears to have been carried over from the
> GICv2 version, but has been turned into something that violates the GIC
> spec, and may trigger SError exceptions on some implementations.
> 
> Marc puts it as follows:
> 
>   The GIC interrupt state machine is pretty strict. An interrupt can
>   only be deactivated (with or without prior priority drop) if it has
>   been acknowledged first. In GIC speak, this means that only the
>   following sequences are valid:
> 
>   With EOImode==0:
> 	  x = ICC_IAR{0,1}_EL1;
> 	  ICC_EOIR{0,1}_EL1 = x;
> 
>   With EOImode==1:
> 	  x = ICC_IAR{0,1}_EL1;
> 	  ICC_EOIR{0,1}_EL1 = x;
> 	  ICC_DIR_EL1 = x;
> 
>   Any write to ICC_EOIR{0,1}_EL1 that isn't the direct consequence of
>   the same value being read from ICC_IAR{0,1}_EL1, and with the correct
>   nesting, breaks the state machine and leads to unpredictable results
>   that affects *all* interrupts in the system (most likely, the priority
>   system is dead). See Figure 4-3 ("Interrupt handling state machine")
>   in Arm IHI 0069F for a description of the acceptable transitions.
> 
>   Additionally, on implementations that have ICC_CTLR_EL1.SEIS==1, a
>   SError may be generated to signal the error. See the various
> 
>   <quote>
> 	  IMPLEMENTATION_DEFINED "SError ....";
>   </quote>
> 
>   that are all over the pseudocode contained in the same architecture
>   spec. Needless to say, this is pretty final for any SW that would do
>   silly things on such implementations (which do exist).
> 
> Given that in our implementation, every signalled interrupt is acked,
> handled and EOId in sequence, there is no reason to EOI all interrupts
> at ExitBootServices() time in the first place, so let's just drop this
> code. This fixes an issue reported by Marc where an SError is triggered
> by this code, bringing down the system.
> 
> Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

Yikes.
Pretty sure that wasn't the right thing to do on gicv2 either.

Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>

> ---
> This is a clear bugfix, but given how late we are in the cycle, I will
> leave it up to Liming to decide whether we can still take this for the
> upcoming stable tag.

I can see hypothetical situations where this could break existing
(broken) firmware ... so I would prefer to leave it until after the
stable tag unless there is substantial benefit to including it here.

/
    Leif

>  ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/GicV3/ArmGicV3Dxe.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/GicV3/ArmGicV3Dxe.c b/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/GicV3/ArmGicV3Dxe.c
> index 85ee4c87b6d1..fa515d1a01ba 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/GicV3/ArmGicV3Dxe.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/ArmGic/GicV3/ArmGicV3Dxe.c
> @@ -344,10 +344,6 @@ GicV3ExitBootServicesEvent (
>      GicV3DisableInterruptSource (&gHardwareInterruptV3Protocol, Index);
>    }
>  
> -  for (Index = 0; Index < mGicNumInterrupts; Index++) {
> -    GicV3EndOfInterrupt (&gHardwareInterruptV3Protocol, Index);
> -  }
> -
>    // Disable Gic Interface
>    ArmGicV3DisableInterruptInterface ();
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24 15:31 [PATCH] ArmPkg/GicV3Dxe: Don't signal EOI on arbitrary interrupts Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-25 12:50 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2021-08-26  2:47   ` 回复: [edk2-devel] " gaoliming
2021-08-27 12:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210825125042.ga3ls2th2l2dotnd@leviathan \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox